Joel Pett by Joel Pett

Joel Pett

Recommended

Comments (45) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. MortyForTyrant

    MortyForTyrant said, 5 months ago

    I just re-read the actual numbers they are fighting over. It’s an increase of 2% (33→35) for people making more than $200K and 3.6% (36→39.6) for those making more than $388K. That’s not a “hike”, thats merely a fluctuation in the grand scheme of things, especially given tax-rates like 90% in the 50s…

    -

    Tax rates over the years (Wikipedia)

  2. mikefive

    mikefive said, 5 months ago

    @MortyForTyrant

    Part of that tax increase is also on dividend payments to shareholders. Going from 15% to 39.6%. Although I’m sure it would make some in these forums happy to see Mitt pay more in taxes, the increase will also effect small share holders that are retired. It begs the question of “What’s fair” again.

  3. Clark  Kent

    Clark Kent said, 5 months ago

    Bring back the tax rates on the rich from the 1960’s.
    Restore the Glass Steagall act, with sharp teeth.
    Haul the thieves of wall street into federal court to be tried for their financial crimes.

  4. narrowminded

    narrowminded said, 5 months ago

    Cut tax rates for everyone.
    Cap spending to the last Clinton budget.
    Haul Obama into court for political graft with the Unions.

  5. Ms. Ima

    Ms. Ima said, 5 months ago

    “The 1%” represents O and ALL the people in Congress. O acts like he’s a poor homeless bum living under a bridge and eating out of garbage cans.
    The election is over. I’m waiting for O to become a leader. I fear it isn’t going to happen.

  6. mikefive

    mikefive said, 5 months ago

    @Mr. King

    I was aware that IRA and 401k contributions were taxed as ordinary income, but I thought that appreciation of the value of those contributions through investment of those funds and dividends from those investments were taxed as capital gains. Also, I was speaking of stocks, etc. held separately form retirement funds. If dividends from stocks, etc. held separately, won’t they be taxed at the new rates if they are enacted?

  7. sclark55

    sclark55 said, 5 months ago

    Maybe I missed it, but did the Prez quit smoking?

  8. ARodney

    ARodney said, 5 months ago

    Ima, your rants get weirder every day. Obama living under a bridge? Obama tells us every week that he’s one of the people who will pay higher taxes. He sells a lot of books, and he knows that it’s his patriotic duty to actually support the country he loves. Why are taxes that are LOWER THAN REAGAN’S suddenly anti American? The reason you are losing the argument in the country is because your arguments literally do not make any sense, they do not stand up to even simple math. Paying taxes is doubtless the only patriotic thing you’ve actually done.

  9. Dycel

    Dycel said, 5 months ago

    @mikefive

    Dont forget the earning caps for these new rates, 200K -250K for married couples (wonder if this applies to same sex couples?).
    -

    By Margaret Collins | Bloomberg News
    http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/55452175-79/tax-percent-income-earners.html.csp
    -

    With all those changes, a family in New York state earning $400,000 a year with $35,000 in dividend income and $20,000 in long-term capital gains would see a tax increase of about $11,500 next year if Congress doesn’t act on expiring tax cuts, said Jay Messing, a senior director of planning at the private bank unit of Wells Fargo & Co. The analysis assumes the family has two children, $27,000 in home-mortgage interest, $20,000 in property taxes paid and $15,000 in charitable contributions.
    -

    It has taken years to get our tax system to this level of support for the wealthier class it will take longer to reset the tax laws that favor everyone else.

  10. Tigger

    Tigger said, 5 months ago

    @mikefive

    You are correct, this will punishe the large majoirty if Middle Class Retirees who put money in 401K’s and IRA’s, also their Pensions ate also considered investment Income, so this Large increase in the Capital Gains Taxes punishes the Middle Class Retires more, and this is what Obama said he would not do, yet this is what he wants to do.

    There is a very Lagre population of Middle Class Retirees who make less that this tax will hit hard

  11. Tigger

    Tigger said, 5 months ago

    @Clark Kent

    Obama would go wih them

    Oh, if you bring back the Rates of the 1960’s you wil be paying 50% t0 65% of your income in IRS Taxes

  12. Stipple

    Stipple said, 5 months ago

    @Tigger

    Somebody spits out the ‘retirees tax’ and it gets explained.
    It gets ignored.
    .
    Its going to hurt the retirees come back.
    .
    Reread above a few, short term tigger. Lay off the smoke and you may remember the posts better.

  13. Tigger

    Tigger said, 5 months ago

    @Mr. King

    Yes, Tax Dederred until they are required to start withdrawing funds when they reach 71, and they’re taxed at the Capital Gains Tax Rate as this is Investment Income, so an increase of the Capital Gains Tax punsihes the Middle Class Retirees more thanany other Class

  14. Tigger

    Tigger said, 5 months ago

    @mikefive

    Have you ever been Employed?

    IRA’s and 40K palns are not taxed at all the Tax is deferred until the individual must start withdrawn funds from the account at age 71, then the Tax is the Capital Gains Tax Rate, erog, an increse in the Capital Gains Tax does indeed punish the Middle Class Retirees.

  15. Tigger

    Tigger said, 5 months ago

    @sclark55

    Nipe, still smokes like a chimney

  16. Load the rest of the comments (30).