Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized
Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you
want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade
to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
I don’t even know why we keep wasting time on this. The Supreme Court has made many rulings on this issue and no amount of legislation can change those rulings.
Are you kidding? According to the NRC we need many more rulings until they get their way! Next, we’ll have rulings on person-hood! Then on citizen-hood!
Hey Joel, if you believe in abortion so much why don’t you spend a day at an abortion “clinic” and perform a few yourself? Come on, it’s just a “group of cells” (according to liberals that is).
Or make you pay for insurance that MIGHT be used to pay for someone else’s cancer. Or pay taxes that might save someone else’s business. It’s called “living in a country.”
My way, or the high way? I’ll take the higher way. The way of women and mothers, those that have the most at stake in this. The decision is and should foremost be theirs.
“Nevermind that at least 5 cases were ruled in favor of Sharia law by liberal judges in violation of US law.”
So just because the cases were judged and decided according to our Constitution and it just happened to (loosely no doubt) align with Sharia law they were decided in favor of Sharia law? Or were they cases of religious freedom and were Constitutionally protected? Give us something more than mere allusion, or will that in itself refute your point?
Joel Pett is a three-time finalist for Pulitzer Prize for cartooning. He won the award in 2000. He joined Lexington Herald-Leader in 1984 and USAToday as contributing cartoonist in 2002.
Henry Payne by Henry Payne
Ted Rall by Ted Rall
Comments (61) (Please sign in to comment)
Clark Kent said, 6 months ago
Exactly. Control freaks, both christian and muslim.
Radish
said, 6 months ago
You must do as I say or my god will be angry with me.
mikefive said, 6 months ago
I don’t even know why we keep wasting time on this. The Supreme Court has made many rulings on this issue and no amount of legislation can change those rulings.
Rx71Wm29 said, 6 months ago
Are you kidding? According to the NRC we need many more rulings until they get their way! Next, we’ll have rulings on person-hood! Then on citizen-hood!
zoidknight said, 6 months ago
@Clark Kent
And atheists, and liberals, and democrats.
zoidknight said, 6 months ago
@Rx71Wm29
Nevermind that at least 5 cases were ruled in favor of Sharia law by liberal judges in violation of US law.
Zipi said, 6 months ago
Hey Joel, if you believe in abortion so much why don’t you spend a day at an abortion “clinic” and perform a few yourself? Come on, it’s just a “group of cells” (according to liberals that is).
Chillbilly
said, 6 months ago
@zoidknight
I gather you’re not a constitutional lawyer.
cdward said, 6 months ago
@Zipi
It is also work for trained medical professionals.
onguard said, 6 months ago
Abortion will never be illegal in the US…. The real question is will Government make you Pay for other peoples Abortion(s).
Gary Kleppe said, 6 months ago
@zoidknight
Show me the atheists, liberals, and Democrats who are trying to take away women’s control over their own bodies. I’ll wait.
ARodney said, 6 months ago
Or make you pay for insurance that MIGHT be used to pay for someone else’s cancer. Or pay taxes that might save someone else’s business. It’s called “living in a country.”
ronald rini
said, 6 months ago
what about women having men put on a condom. and we would have less std and abortions. I see no problem with abortion but not to use as birth control.
Patrick JB Flynn
said, 6 months ago
My way, or the high way? I’ll take the higher way. The way of women and mothers, those that have the most at stake in this. The decision is and should foremost be theirs.
TheTrustedMechanic said, 6 months ago
@zoidknight
“Nevermind that at least 5 cases were ruled in favor of Sharia law by liberal judges in violation of US law.”
So just because the cases were judged and decided according to our Constitution and it just happened to (loosely no doubt) align with Sharia law they were decided in favor of Sharia law? Or were they cases of religious freedom and were Constitutionally protected? Give us something more than mere allusion, or will that in itself refute your point?