Joe Heller by Joe Heller

Joe Heller

Comments (7) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 1 year ago

    The prez could have accepted flexibility in the “cuts”, but no, he wants maximum punishment to those who dare to reign in debt.

  2. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 1 year ago

    As I was about to reply to ConserveGov, I suddenly remembered that every bill that has squeaked through the legislation to the President’s desk has had rider and amendments attached to them. Some of them were never debated in committee and no one can be ‘blamed for them" because they were attached with no names. I find it shocking and horrifying that our gov’t can function like this legally.
    Every bill that goes to the President’s desk is a ticking bomb with some new rule or law no one has given proper attention and to which Americans are going to have to obey. Some will be pleased with this ambush legislation, one bill made laws preventing gov’t oversight on guns permanent, another made it harder to prosecute agricultural companies if their genetically modified plants had problems. These and more were attached to the spending bill, a bill that “HAD” to be passed.
    What will be put into the immigration bill? Or other future bills? Even if you get what you want “THIS time”, do you want to lose something because of what another congressman does “NEXT TIME”?
    Also, the legislation has nearly gutted the bill passed last year to prevent them from using their positions to profit off of the stock market.
    Your gov’t at work.
    How many of you have written to your congressmen and senators?
    The sequester is a ham handed way for cowardly legislators to get out of doing their jobs. There are specific cuts that could be made and so many other ways to make our gov’t more efficient without doing the damage to the middle class. They just won’t.
    Respectfully,
    and a little scared,
    C.

  3. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 1 year ago

    “Not too much of a hypocrit there, wrench jockey”

    Good grief, HOWGOZIT. How many times do different people have to tell you how the sequester happened before you believe it. The data from the dot gov sites TTM has previously referenced are easily verifiable. Multiple, credible news sites have write-ups on the sequence of events leading up to the sequester becoming law. Have you considered that the source of information you are using has an agenda and that agenda doesn’t include reality?

  4. edinbaltimore

    edinbaltimore GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    It’s too bad SCOTUS said the line item veto was unconstitutional. Then we would see, after a veto, who TRULY wanted WHAT! AND who chickened out when it came to voting for a specific item NOT hidden in another bill.

  5. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 1 year ago

    @edinbaltimore

    Thank You Edinbaltimore.
    My feelings exactly.
    Gratefully,
    C.

  6. MortyForTyrant

    MortyForTyrant said, over 1 year ago

    I don’t know what this latest craze is, with the Cinnamon, and I don’t care, but you Americans have always been crazy and will one day kill yourselves. Darwin Award for a whole nation – unprecedented…

  7. BronyInk

    BronyInk said, about 1 year ago

    So the ciniman challenge is what, eat a teaspoon of cinnamon? What do doctors think we did as kids when we couldn’t find any candy?

  8. Refresh Comments.