Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim MorinNo Zoom

Recommended

Comments (29) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Fairportfan2

    Fairportfan2 GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    That’s what Cheney and Bush did with Iraq.

  2. MortyForTyrant

    MortyForTyrant said, 11 months ago

    @Fairportfan2

    Correction: what they TRIED to do with Iraq. Had it worked the U.S. wouldn’t be in this dire financial mess…

  3. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, 11 months ago

    @Fairportfan2

    Do you mean the war Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and 80 other Democrats voted for?

  4. 4my10851cs

    4my10851cs said, 11 months ago

    @ConserveGov

    YES, but don’t try to remind them of it

  5. cdward

    cdward said, 11 months ago

    Probably mean the war that the administration of the time lied about, giving Congress false information which induced them to vote for it. However, given all that, why would you be pushing for a NEW war?

  6. Mephistopholes

    Mephistopholes GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    This is a problem the Tea Party must face. They talk about paying less taxes but they aren’t willing to give up: The Imperialism of America, reduced military, reduced Medicare, or Reduced Social Security. Where all the money goes.

    They seem convinced that all the money is going for Foreign Aid (A relatively insignificant portion of the Federal budget) and wasteful spending.

  7. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, 11 months ago

    @Mephistopholes

    I think the Tea Party is like other self-interested political factions: give me mine at the expense of theirs.


    Case in point are the Oklahoma Senators Inhofe and Coburn who will ask for disaster relief for horrific tornados which ravaged their state from the federal government, but will expect it to be offset by other spending cuts.


    Should those spending cuts be agricultural subsidies to Oklahoma? Or maybe petrochemical subsidies? How about federal highway funding for Oklahoma’s massive road system?


    I have a feeling they’ll target the poor and desperate in other places. It’s a cruel and pointless philosophy.


    And of course, as you pointed out, they’ll talk about foreign aid as if it were crippling our economy. Essentially, they’ll throw sand in our eyes expecting us to be distracted from the bigger truth about who their masters are.

  8. ARodney

    ARodney said, 11 months ago

    I think Obama should tell the congress that if they want him to intervene in Syria, (A) they have to actually declare war as required by the constitution, and (B) they have to pay for it with an income-tax surcharge based on the cost of the last war. The GOP would instantly become a group of peace-loving hippies, and our soldiers would stay home.

  9. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    Here we go again. You talk about the tea party as if it were a third party in our two party system. It is not.

    But be that as it may, perhaps you don’t understand the logic behind smaller government. The PURPOSE of government is to PROTECT the rights of the people as outlined in the constitution. In order to do that, the government must protect the country by securing borders and regulating those that enter. All these other things like commerce, education, the environment, infrastructure, welfare, unemployment and so on should be the responsibility of the various states.

    All foreign aid should be tied to items that would improve the life style of the recipient nation. NO weapons or military assistance period. However other countries (Russia, China) would then be free to militarily overwhelm those we call allies.

    Is that your goal, to see the world run by a government that is based on the Russian or Chinese methods? Remember that the founder of the current system in China said that “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun” and practiced that concept well killing tens of millions of his own people to gain power. And, The political system under Putin was primarily characterized by some elements of Economic liberalism, a lack of transparency in governance, cronyism and pervasive corruption. Hmmmm sounds like Obama has a model and he has become more “flexible”. He can twist things with the best of them.

    I’m glad I am old and on the way out.

  10. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 11 months ago

    @Mephistopholes

    If this so-called tea party (conservative extremists) could learn to hate less and understand more…..

  11. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 11 months ago

    @Bruce4671

    I am old as well, Bruce…
    So, you seem to favor larger state governments and smaller federal…
    IMO, added together, this makes for a larger than ever government size…

    Where you and I disagree is : The purpose of government….in our constitution….
    I omit “the constitution”. , a paper written hundreds of years ago….
    Should we live in the past ???
    We do agree in the middle paragraph, BUT, foreign aid which benefits both nations (donor and donee).
    Also, I consider NO nation to be an “enemy”.
    BUT, Islam (extremism) is a problem..

  12. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, 11 months ago

    @Gore Bane

    Very true. I don’t hear anybody with any influence on the right advocating sending troops to Syria.

    Morin is just doing his job as Pres of the Obama Fan Club. Trying to throw out non-issues to deflect attention away from Barry’s trifecta of scandals.

  13. Sharuniboy

    Sharuniboy GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    States Rights as GOVERNMENT in the 21st Century, in a Nation of over 300Million citizens, 50 States, and a host of Territories and Possessions, is one of the silliest fantasies around. Yet, this kind of nonsense is what those who want to turn the clocks backwards to the 18th Century – or beyond, to the Dark Ages – seem to think is how the present day “ought to be”.


    These imbeciles want a State, for instance, to have something such as a 70 Miles per hour speed limit on the highways; which would become 15 Miles per hour, maximum, with a man walking ahead carrying a lantern, so as not to startle the livestock, at whatever State border crossing came next, (Which, by the way, IS a Statute still on the books in one New England State); and, while somewhat a matter of hyperbole, that kind of stupidity is the hallmark of those holding to the Tea Potty themes.


    These people know NOTHING ABOUT the Constitution, or history, or much else for that matter. But, they are the perfect people for 21st Century government in the world today. (Or, at least, so they would have everyone fooled into believing, anyway.) Superstitious idiots – with “creation science” as a goal for education – arrogantly stubbornly stupid nut-cult religious kooks – with a State Establishment of Religion as a goal for North Carolina – etc., etc.


    Constant critique of anything and everything attempted in the way of Federal Government in Washington – including repeated imbecilic, and time wasting, attempts to repeal previous Legislation, – WITHOUT A MAJORITY in both Houses; and with a President from another Party holding Office – while DOING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to meet today’s problems, and a never ending whine of, “Not only NO, but Hell NO!”, to every proposal for getting things done for ALL Americans – and . . . ! But, why go on?


    The Preamble to the Constitution speaks of " . . . in order to form a more perfect Union . . . ." Today’s Tea Potty excrement seek only to DESTROY the Union, in favor if a totally childish anarchy.


    Isn’t it about time to find a flush lever on this potty, and send this kind of thing on its way to where it belongs?

  14. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, 11 months ago

    @Gore Bane

    " Show me one conservative group that advocates intervention in Syria. If you can’t, then STFU."

    Read John McCain’s article in last week’s TIME magazine. He may not be on the Tea Party’s speed dial, but he is convinced we need to intervene. You’re welcome.

  15. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, 11 months ago

    @Bruce4671

    " All these other things like commerce, education, the environment, infrastructure, welfare, unemployment and so on should be the responsibility of the various states. "

    We tried that with Medicaid, and ended up with a crazy quilt of benefits. This resulted in large numbers of people moving from state to state to get the best benefits for their particular medical issues.

    And let’s not forget how much time and money was spent taking Obamacare to the Supreme Court. Of course, no one will tell us how much, but I think we can all agree it was a truckload.

    Now multiply that by 50. And then multiply that number by every government-sponsored program that would provide differing benefits depending on the state. And don’t forget that West Virginia will sue Ohio for not keeping the air clean because of its desire for industry, and for Virginia to sue West Virginia because blowing tops off mountains in order to mine more cheaply has the effect of damming rivers that run out of state…….

    This would have the effect of guaranteeing the have/have not society, where only the lawyers have money and the rest of us have to wait for the courts to decide what basic services we can have. Don’t forget the unlimited number of appeals.

    I think it’s safe to say that a majority of Americans, regardless of political party, feel as though their tax dollars are poorly spent.

    Not all of us, though, believe that we should spend money only for war, and to hell with anything else, and that’s what I see from the Tea Party. I would prefer not to waste money in the first place, but if we are going to waste it, I’d rather do so helping my fellow Americans than by being able to kill all over the planet.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (14).