Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin

Recommended

Comments (38) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

     photo protestforever_zps7f3c7e0a.jpg

  2. solarrhino

    solarrhino said, about 1 year ago

    Imagine how stupid you’re going to look in forty years, when people are marrying animals, the family is completely destroyed, and society is in ashes.

  3. Kylie2112

    Kylie2112 said, about 1 year ago

    @solarrhino

    Just like the South said would happen if you allowed interracial marriage?
    -
    Also, animals can’t sign contracts.
    -
    Also, marriage equality helps us transgender folk, since when and what you can change with regards to legal sex/gender varies wildly by state. Even what constitutes “reassignment surgery” differs.
    -
    Guess what, you won’t even notice.

  4. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    And how would that be, since Married couples would tend to be in a much more monogamous
    relationship, therefore SLOWING the spread of HIV??

    Oh wait, I forgot who I was talking to…Don’t pay any attention to truth, reality or facts, just put on your tinfoil hat, and tune in Rush and Billow Reilly!

  5. Clark  Kent

    Clark Kent said, about 1 year ago

    @Ms Ima,
    No disrespect meant, but are you hermaphrodite? Or asexual?

  6. ARodney

    ARodney said, about 1 year ago

    When Scalia asked “when did denying gay marriage become unconstitutional,” I wish the defense had said “at the same time that denying inter-racial marriage became unconstitutional.”

  7. ARodney

    ARodney said, about 1 year ago

    @solarrhino

    Gay marriage is not a threat to MY marriage. And even without gay marriage, Rush is on his fourth wife. Maybe you conservatives just need some counseling or something.

  8. Jase99

    Jase99 said, about 1 year ago

    @solarrhino

    “Imagine how stupid you’re going to look in forty years, when people are marrying animals, the family is completely destroyed, and society is in ashes.”

    Forget about 40 years. Your arguments are stupid now. Animals can’t give consent, therefore they cannot enter into a legal contract such as marriage. As for “the family” being “completely destroyed.” heterosexuals are perfectly capable of that on their own. I was physically and mentally abused by my straight father. I know people who were also physically abused growing up and a couple who were sexually abused. Tell me, exactly how are homosexual parents going to be any worse than heterosexual couples already are??

  9. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @ARodney

    Not to mention Billow Reilly trying to destroy his Ex-Wife, even getting the Catholic Cult involved to attempt an excommunication, and all!
    He’s just another typical Right-Wing Conservative hypocritical fraud!
    “Pro-Family Values”!
    Yeah. Right!

  10. Jase99

    Jase99 said, about 1 year ago

    “Another boost to HIV.”

    And how will gay marriage be a "boost to HIV? I ask full well knowing you have zero intention of ever backing up any of your BS claims with a thought out, reasoned explanation.

  11. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @solarrhino

    The legal definition of “Marriage” needs to be something like;
    “The union of two Humans of legal age of consent, agreed to by both parties.”
    Period.
    NO mention of Race.
    NO mention of Gender.
    People used to think Inter-racial Marriage was “Going To Destroy The Country!”
    Well, guess what…it hasn’t happened!

  12. Lynne B

    Lynne B GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @ARodney

    When Scalia asked “when did denying gay marriage become unconstitutional,” I wish the defense had said “at the same time that denying inter-racial marriage became unconstitutional.”


    THIS. So much this. Yes.

  13. Mhic Dhu Ghaill

    Mhic Dhu Ghaill GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @solarrhino

    Universal Unitarian “church” is already discussing multiple partner marriages….just sayin’

  14. Lynne B

    Lynne B GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @ScottPM

    We don’t do things like you suggest because most of us live in the real world, where systems are required to actually work to a certain basic standard.


    Also, I continue to be flabbergasted by how many people don’t seem to understand that “two mutually consenting competent adults” doesn’t impinge on things like incest prohibitions, which ironically ARE the most universal prohibition that humanity has — given that there have been multiple cultures which accepted same-sex marriage, and not a single culture anywhere that had no incest prohibition.


    (On an ironic side note, however, those people who defend “traditional” marriage based on Biblical definitions ought to have no problem at all with 1 man/multiple women marriages. Those were normal, in the Bible.)

  15. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @solarrhino

    Sounds amazingly like those arguments we heard about “miscegenation” back in the 60’s. Your kind was on the wrong side of history then, and you’re on the wrong side of history now.
    But carry on being wrong; I mean, it would be a shame to break a half-century-long streak!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (23).