Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin

Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. 4my10851cs

    4my10851cs said, over 1 year ago

    that’s why they gave you a gun

  2. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    She is one of the rare ones.

  3. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @4my10851cs

    If you use a gun against an officer, you are in deep trouble.

  4. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, over 1 year ago

    @Rad-ish

    Think I´d rather be in deep trouble than being raped.

  5. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, over 1 year ago

    The UCMJ prohibits a superior ‘fraternising’ with a subordinate. It prohibits disobeying a direct order. So if a superior orders a subordinate to ‘fraternise’ and not tell anyone, and the subordinate reports the ‘fraternisation’, both are guilty of violating the UCMJ. The law’s the law, and both should respect and follow it. Especially the subordinate (the superior is much more valuable, and so must be given more leeway in interpreting the law, but the subordinate must follow the law to the letter).

  6. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, over 1 year ago

    @4my10851cs

    “If guns protected women, the army would be the safest place to be.” Nope.

  7. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, over 1 year ago

    @Michael wme

    Wait, what? Are you being sarcastic again? Women should allow themselves to be raped against the code of conduct?

  8. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 1 year ago

    My daughter is a Major who served in Iraq twice and Afghanistan once. While she wasn’t harassed, she knows women who were.
    The oath each soldier takes requires them to defend the Constitution against all enemies, Foreign AND Domestic. This oath gives women the right and DUTY to stand up to attackers and when superiors fail to support those women in uniform, they are not only in violation of the code of conduct, but they are violating their oath of service.
    Respectfully,
    C.

  9. alcors3

    alcors3 said, over 1 year ago

    She looks like the west end of a horse going east.

    How can they defend the Constitution from the current administration?

  10. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 1 year ago

    @alcors3

    Funny! An ugly soldier! Teeheehee! Why don’t you grow up?

  11. Jase99

    Jase99 said, over 1 year ago

    @alcors3

    How can they defend the Constitution from the current administration?

    How do enlisted soldiers “defend the Constitution from the current administration?” Please be as specific as possible.

  12. Kylie2112

    Kylie2112 said, over 1 year ago

    @motivemagus

    I take it you’ve never read one of Michael’s posts. He’s a pro at this.

  13. majormarj

    majormarj GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Michael wme

    Have you not been paying attention?! Military “justice” is not in play here: read the report in Rolling Stone and google Congressional testimony about rape in the military. Horrific, tragic, common, no redress, no justice.

  14. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, over 1 year ago

    I think it says something that, given this serious issue in the military, the best that some of our more right-leaning commenters can come up with is “well, she’s probably gay” or “she’s ugly so who cares”.
    Soldiers are supposed to be disciplined and follow the rules at all times. None of this “boys will be boys” crap. If a male soldier cannot keep himself from assaulting a fellow soldier simply because she’s a woman, then he is a substandard soldier who is damaging his unit’s cohesion and his service’s readiness, and should be treated as such.
    No excuses, no equivocation.

  15. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    “She was in the ‘gay’ group. They were too busy ignoring her.”

    Wow. That’s ugly, even for you. Keep up the good work.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).