Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin

Recommended

Comments (35) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. 4my10851cs

    4my10851cs said, 3 months ago

    that’s why they gave you a gun

  2. Radish

    Radish said, 3 months ago

    She is one of the rare ones.

  3. Radish

    Radish said, 3 months ago

    @4my10851cs

    If you use a gun against an officer, you are in deep trouble.

  4. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, 3 months ago

    @Radish

    Think I´d rather be in deep trouble than being raped.

  5. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, 3 months ago

    The UCMJ prohibits a superior ‘fraternising’ with a subordinate. It prohibits disobeying a direct order. So if a superior orders a subordinate to ‘fraternise’ and not tell anyone, and the subordinate reports the ‘fraternisation’, both are guilty of violating the UCMJ. The law’s the law, and both should respect and follow it. Especially the subordinate (the superior is much more valuable, and so must be given more leeway in interpreting the law, but the subordinate must follow the law to the letter).

  6. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, 3 months ago

    @4my10851cs

    “If guns protected women, the army would be the safest place to be.” Nope.

  7. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, 3 months ago

    @Michael wme

    Wait, what? Are you being sarcastic again? Women should allow themselves to be raped against the code of conduct?

  8. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, 3 months ago

    My daughter is a Major who served in Iraq twice and Afghanistan once. While she wasn’t harassed, she knows women who were.
    The oath each soldier takes requires them to defend the Constitution against all enemies, Foreign AND Domestic. This oath gives women the right and DUTY to stand up to attackers and when superiors fail to support those women in uniform, they are not only in violation of the code of conduct, but they are violating their oath of service.
    Respectfully,
    C.

  9. alcors3

    alcors3 said, 3 months ago

    She looks like the west end of a horse going east.

    How can they defend the Constitution from the current administration?

  10. ARodney

    ARodney said, 3 months ago

    @alcors3

    Funny! An ugly soldier! Teeheehee! Why don’t you grow up?

  11. Jase99

    Jase99 said, 3 months ago

    @alcors3

    How can they defend the Constitution from the current administration?

    How do enlisted soldiers “defend the Constitution from the current administration?” Please be as specific as possible.

  12. Kylie2112

    Kylie2112 said, 3 months ago

    @motivemagus

    I take it you’ve never read one of Michael’s posts. He’s a pro at this.

  13. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 3 months ago

    WOW
    What a diff between a “balanced man” and a so-called conservative…
    And all the good from not one but many generations of education…..
    RT
    Ima

    Sorry, that I color conservatives in a negative light , is justified by what they have to say on this forum.
    Actually, intellectually, there is little difference between cons and libs, and BOTH are necessary.

  14. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, 3 months ago

    Perhaps, the term “the spirit of the Constitution” would do better..

  15. majormarj

    majormarj said, 3 months ago

    @Michael wme

    Have you not been paying attention?! Military “justice” is not in play here: read the report in Rolling Stone and google Congressional testimony about rape in the military. Horrific, tragic, common, no redress, no justice.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (20).