Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin

Comments (18) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, almost 4 years ago

    And yet Barry and the Spendocrats say that not collecting enough taxes is the problem.

  2. braindead08

    braindead08 GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    This cartoon is soooo false. Everyone knows there is NO waste in the Pentagon or any other aspect of defense spending. We need every one of those flag officers.
    Also, we need every one of those weapons systems, even those the Pentagon doesn’t want.

  3. ARodney

    ARodney said, almost 4 years ago


    Not collecting enough taxes IS the problem. You obviously haven’t done the math. But math is not a strong point for either half of your name…

  4. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, almost 4 years ago

    At least o’s salary is safe. Whew!

  5. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, almost 4 years ago

    This may be the only way possible to cut defense spending, so it has some merits.

  6. mikefive

    mikefive said, almost 4 years ago

    I wonder how much the Pentagon budget could be reduced just by getting Congress to quit pushing pork down the military’s throat and making them buy things they don’t even want. Another place would be to get the military to quit changing specifications on an item after it’s in development or production. That really drives up the per unit cost. They should have those specs 98% solid when they put something out for bid.

  7. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, almost 4 years ago

    Doesn’t he mean suck in your waste?

  8. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, almost 4 years ago

    “It’s only waste if it benefits someone other than me.”

  9. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, almost 4 years ago

    Yeah. we need to cut defense. I agree there is tons of waste in the programs. I even agree with trout when he rants about the failed jet engines and or new tech that doesn’t improve anything in reality.

    Gore Bane says: “The military has been attempting for years to cut back on unneeded National Guard and Reserve forces, only to be thwarted by Congress members protecting their own back yards.”

    And the answer to that is reduce the size of the regular Army and reassign those troops to the National Guard in there home states and let the States take up the burden. Give them the equipment as well and let the States take up the maintenance. Wonder how long before the States would reduce that number

    But gee, here is a though. And right up a liberals….alley.

    The sequester calls for reducing spending by 85 billion (pocket change really) and we as the generous nation we are do this:


    Bank subsidies? (mutters to self) big banks get a bailout, big banks get subsidized, big banks are the epitome of that evil hated class, the 1%. What is wrong with this picture? OH yeah, “establishment” republicans will choke on that one but see “conservatives” will agree with it and help get it passed. But then you really, really…….REALLY hate the true conservatives.

  10. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    “Funny how the bloated entitlement programs are never mentioned.”

    I guess if you had a functional brain you might realize that the DOD budget has more than DOUBLED since your hero Bush first took office. Of course Obama is complicit in this spending as he has maintained GW’s favorite war and other military spending. Now Obama wants to expand more troops in South East Asia and Africa so we can make a “presence” in those areas. I guess Obama doesn’t care if we fire up a few more chicken shit little wars like Afghanistan or Iraq. What is it we’re going to accomplish there? Oh yes, save them for democracy…


    TONY PRESSER said, almost 4 years ago

    What bloated entitlement programs? Name some.

  12. outside looking in

    outside looking in said, almost 4 years ago

    funny when we regulated airlines traveling was a pleasure trucking cos had a effcient freight sys taxes were steep ceos got 40 x what worker got now they get 460 x these guys arent job creaters guys like jobs elan musk branson are the creators help them not ceo headge fund management or bankers

  13. M Ster

    M Ster said, almost 4 years ago


    Bruce, I agree with you on this one. Regarding true conservatives (and this is a serious question), can you name any in elected office today? I can’t. I also can’t name many true liberals.
    While there are major policy differences between “establishment” Republicans and “establishment” Democrats, they are both big spenders that take a lot of money from bankers and defense contractors. They just allocate their bloated budgets differently.

  14. mikefive

    mikefive said, almost 4 years ago

    Either that or he’s some kid on a phone and he’s forgetting that he’s not communicating with other children.

  15. mikefive

    mikefive said, almost 4 years ago

    Yes,Gary, I will pick on his formatting. If he wants to communicate his point he should at least try and communicate it with standard English grammar (or at least come close) and not middle school texting. I see no reason that I should have to mentally inject some kind of punctuation somewhere to try to understand him.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (3).