Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin

Comments (28) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    War can be counted on for one thing, it’s an equal opportunity killer…

  2. cjr53

    cjr53 said, over 1 year ago

    This is a step forward towards equality for all. Women are not required to volunteer for military service.

  3. cjr53

    cjr53 said, over 1 year ago

    The real answer is to stop having wars.
    Let’s leave Afghanistan now.

  4. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 1 year ago

    Looks like even super-libs like Morin aren’t too happy with the commander-in-chief anymore.

  5. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, over 1 year ago


    I do not actually know how President Obama feels about this, but the decision itself came from the military chiefs in the Pentagon.

    And for once, I will stand with you on this particular issue. Do we really want potential (and in some cases, actual) wives and mothers to be deliberately placed into active combat positions?

    I say no!

    I know that they have sometimes had to do this in all the wars this country has experienced. But to deliberately place them into the horrors of actual combat does not seem to me to be giving real progress to either men or women.

    Is it not bad enough that men sometimes have to do this?

    Should we now have women (who already sometimes have problems with PMS, now be able to experience the joys of PTSD as well?

    Perhaps I am old fashioned, but again I say NO!

  6. Clark  Kent

    Clark Kent said, over 1 year ago

    @Robert Landers

    Do you want you son, brother, cousin, uncle or father coming home in a flag draped coffin instead?
    To hell war. The illegal and greedy actions of the cheney/shrub/rumsfeld misadministration have turned the entire world against us and they hate us with good reason. Close most overseas military bases. Employ our veterans and jobless in good union jobs rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure. Restore the 75% tax rate on the wealthy from the 1960’s. restore Glass Steagal with sharp teeth.

  7. NebulousRikulau

    NebulousRikulau GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    Nope. This has been discussed up there since the 70s or so, and there have been policy changes since then, little by little, leading up to this.

    @Robert Landers
    I can think of little more terrifying than an attack by a division of female soldiers with Automatic Weapons AND PMS.

  8. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Before you complain…yes, this is a paste, but it’s easier then writing it out again…

    I am curious…does this mean that the Women who are currently in the military can be transferred to front-line combat groups, or does it mean that new, incoming recruits can volunteer for them?

    Just wondering, since there is no draft. If Women who enlist voluntarily know they can end up on the front lines, and join KNOWING that fact, then I don’t see an issue with it.

  9. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    I used to laugh about the thought of Captain Janeway, on “Star Trek – Voyager” coming up to the Borg and announcing “Attention Borg Ship…I’ve got PMS, and a Phaser! Don’t screw with me!”

  10. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 1 year ago

    The female has only 60% to 80% of the strength (pick your source for these numbers, they vary considerably) of a male of the same height. The male averages about 5" taller than the female thus exaggerating the female/male strength difference. In front line combat, meaning the “grunts”, strength is a prime consideration. If the combatants are of equal training, the larger person will normally win making “bigger is better” of exaggerated importance to the front line. I hope that this decision to put females in front line positions was made from reasoned, experimental data and not political correctness. I would hate to see something done in the name of political correctness get troops unnecessarily killed.

  11. mshefler

    mshefler said, over 1 year ago


    Yeah but automatic weapons are a great equalizer.

  12. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, over 1 year ago


    In order for President Obama to make every decision for even our bloated military, he would have to be cloned literally thousands of times!

    How would all of you Obama haters like that!!

  13. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, over 1 year ago

    @Clark Kent

    There is nobody on these boards that hates war anymore that I do!

    I worked on the Apollo project that sent Americans to the moon, and I saw just what war did to the funding for the greatest civilian project in the history of man. Instead of having bases on the moon and going on to Mars (thus leading humanity into becoming a true space faring civilization, eventually saving us from our own environmental follies) we blew expensive (both in terms of our blood, and our wealth) holes in rice paddies in Southeastern Asia. And now we did (and are still doing) the same for the deserts of Iraq, and the mountains of Afghanistan. As a great song says “When will they EVER learn!”

    I love it when the more conservative members here are against governmental waste. The greatest waste that we have is in the bloated military, (a military over ten times as expensive as the next ten militaries of the world combined) that is not needed for our own public safety. We are not stopping Al Queda and other militants by going into their countries and angering them even more than they already are!

    What IS needed for our safety is good police work, and good courts (within our own country) and prisons for those that would harm us!

    Yes, and unfortunately (for mankind in general) like all nations we do need a creditable military deterrent against direct aggression, but we could do that for easily less than half the cost of our present military establishment. A truly great military commander and president by the name of Dwight David Eisenhower (one of our better Republican presidents) said that this country needed to beware of a bloated, expensive, and somewhat useless military/industrial complex!!

    In fact, our military escapades are the greatest single recruiting methodology for such as Al Queda. How would we feel if another far more powerful military (say the Chinese for instance) were to come into this country and raise havoc with our people and infrastructure?

    As for the Viet Nahm episode, not only did we eventually lose, but now that country is one of our best trading partners in South Eastern Asia.
    Ironically, with a budding tourist industry based a great deal on former Viet Nahm vets going back and seeing their former “enemies”!

    War itself is both the greatest waste and the saddest activity of all mankind!!!!!!!

    By the way, the rest of your post was terrific and totally correct!

  14. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, over 1 year ago


    So you think that the type of fanatics in the Middle East that are perfectly willing to blow themselves up to get their 72 virgins, are going to fear ANYTHING this world or our military can throw at them?

    You fight these kinds of people in only one way. By staying the H**L away from them!!

    Just how many nations (and even world empires) have wasted themselves and their blood in the mountains of Afghanistan over the length of human history?

    Hopefully, getting out of that particular quagmire by the end of 2014 (and even speeding it up to the end of this year) is one promise to the American people that President Obama will truly deep!!

    Just ask former Russian soldiers just how much “fun” it is to have been there, if not our own returning people riddled with PTSD!

  15. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, over 1 year ago


    He has two beautiful daughters, how would you reasonably think he personally feels?

    But, if he were to oppose the pentagon generals in this, would you then not be among the first to castigate him for interfering in their area of prerogative?

    The problem that you and the other ultra conservative people here that seem to hate the man so much have, is that when you oppose EVERY decision he makes you then begin to lose all credibility in opposing almost ANY decision he makes.

    As a relative moderate, I not only do not support every decision he makes, I have never support all of the decisions that ANY president has made. And as I was born in 1942 that is quite a lot of presidencies!!

    Might it be too presumptuous of me to suggest that you and some of the other ultra conservatives here possibly start to do the same. And thus actually gain credibility for those instances where your opposition actually makes reasonable sense?

    To say nothing of making these boards a lot more pleasant place to visit and comment upon. Just a thought, is all…..

  16. Load the rest of the comments (13).