Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin

Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 3 years ago

    Don’t be so sure. I’m sure he has an executive order in the works to make that nightmare 3rd term possible.

  2. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, over 3 years ago


    Looking at how the republicans are in a hurry to change laws in regards to voting it seems to be the other way around.

  3. Movingsound

    Movingsound GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    What a weird fantasy world. Kings and third terms. Try concentrating on something positive. Maybe some meditation would help you or volunteering at your church.

  4. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 3 years ago

    @Tue Elung-Jensen

    No sarcasm intended here. Curiosity. What laws do you speak of?

  5. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 3 years ago

    Though I can believe the GOP initiated the 22d Amendment it could not have gotten out of Congress without Democratic support. In 1947 the Senate was 53% Republican and the House was 57% Republican. It requires 67% (2/3) yea votes to send an amendment to the states. The splits in the state legislatures at that time would also have required some Democratic support to reach the 75% ratification requirement.

  6. PlainBill

    PlainBill said, over 3 years ago


    Recall that in 1947 the South was represented by ‘Southern Democrats’, AKA ‘Dixiecrats’ – Democrats in name, but the political agenda of Republicans.

  7. ODon

    ODon said, over 3 years ago


    Look at what Virginia lawmakers just did regarding electoral votes. Question now is will the Governor sign it or, knowing it is an un American approach to voting, veto the bill.

    Federal elections need federal guidelines too many votes are ignored via the abuses of partisan politics.

  8. PlainBill

    PlainBill said, over 3 years ago


    In the latest election Obama won the popular vote in a number of states with a Republican majority in both the State House, State Senate, and a Republican Governor. Most of those states apportion the electoral votes on a ‘Winner Take All’ basis. The current #1 ‘Big Idea’ in the Republican Party is for those states to change state law so electoral votes are apportioned in the same percentage as the popular vote. The theory, of course, is that that MIGHT have given Romney enough electoral votes to win, even though he lost the popular vote.

    As an idea of how desperate the Republicans are, their #2 ‘Big Idea’ is ASKING the rank and file Republicans for advice.
    Of course, nobody believes they will actually USE the suggestions.

  9. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 3 years ago


    I think that guidelines is all the Federal Government could put out. If memory serves (always dangerous ground), I think it would take a constitutional amendment to make something like that law and I can’t see the states giving up a right like that.

  10. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 3 years ago

    It has oft been said that the greatest thing George Washington ever did was to step down and allow the next man to peacefully assume power. There were many calling for this accomplished leader to become a virtual king, a president for life, but he set the standard that allowed for 43 other men to peacefully assume power in the name of our Constitution. For the oath of office to be recited 56 more times.
    The first president to make the claim that he, and he alone, despite any election results or acts of congress, has the authority, duty, and/or right to maintain his hold on power will be the president who will force Americans to rise up as one in revolution against the man, not the Presidency. It is my firm belief that our military, who vows to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic, will not allow this to happen.

  11. Paul Harvey

    Paul Harvey said, over 3 years ago

    And that would have been after the Progs had changed it for them?

  12. Simon_Jester

    Simon_Jester said, over 3 years ago

    Aren’t righties hilarious?
    When Bush was President, they couldn’t get enough of Presidential Power. Remember the theory of the Unitary Presidency? The tea-baggers-to-be loved that one to death. Every time Bush circumvented Congress through a recess appointent, issued an executive order, or attached ‘signing statement’ to a bill he’d just approved it was, “Yeeee-HAW! You go, George! Yew-Ess-AY! Yew-Ess-AY!” "
    Trouble is back then, they assumed that the Republican Party was going to hold the Presidency forever. Ooops, didn’t happen. That’s the thing that really sticks in the craw of all the cons throwing hissy fits on this thread. Whatever’s going on here, they brought it on themselves.

  13. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, over 3 years ago


    Oh God, how awful. Four MORE years of making the country better for the likes of you.

  14. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 3 years ago

    The conservatives here are in fantasy moonbeam rainbow land. There are no plans for a third term. There is climate change, and it’s been proved to be human caused. Tax cuts for the rich haven’t created jobs. Maybe you should educate yourselves before showing what ignoramuses you are?

  15. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago


    “Don’t be so sure. I’m sure he has an executive order in the works to make that nightmare 3rd term possible.”

    Really? That makes Obama even more of a Reagan Republican. I remember when Republicans briefly pondered the possibility of changing the Presidential term limit towards the end of the Reagan Administration..

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).