Jim Morin’s drawings won the Pulitzer Prize for editorial cartooning in 1996. He shared the Pulitzer in 1983 with other members of the Miami Herald editorial board, and was a Pulitzer finalist in 1977 and 1990. His work is syndicated internationally by the New York Times/CWS Syndicate.
The Miami Herald - All Rights Reserved.
Glenn McCoy by Glenn McCoy
Jack Ohman by Jack Ohman
Comments (31) (Please sign in to comment)
dtroutma
said, 8 months ago
He did watch the debate, and Mitt’s presentation.
MortyForTyrant said, 8 months ago
Etch-a-sketches are not limited to being shaken once. If you vote for this clown you have NO WAY of telling what he would do as president. He can’t be trusted!
Radish
said, 8 months ago
Mitt will have a completely different set of plans and proposals to lie about at the next debate.
Clark Kent said, 8 months ago
Not by becoming a moderate, but by lying like crazy and by being a bully. Big time fail. Those cheerleaders are dumb.
alcors3 said, 8 months ago
The cheerleaders are acting more like Obamoids praising their messiah. Or are they all facing mecca?
cdward said, 8 months ago
@alcors3
Dude, you don’t like Obama? Fine! But get off your idiotic “messiah” thing. The only people who ever said anything about that are GOPers. Democrats have always had their criticisms – you just are too busy saying we think he’s a messiah to pay attention. Hate his policies all you want, but at least don’t look like a slime-ball about it.
Movingsound
said, 8 months ago
Time for a serious third party.
Movingsound
said, 8 months ago
@alcors3
Mecca??? Your hillbilly avatar doesn’t even come close to such a stupid remark.
narrowminded said, 8 months ago
@Clark Kent
Severely out of touch with reality.
Ms. Ima said, 8 months ago
@Clark Kent
What’s the definition of a ‘dumb’ person?
Anyone who doesn’t agree with Cluck.
Ms. Ima said, 8 months ago
@Movingsound
Nothing like splitting the vote so no one clearly wins the election. But libs can’t figure that out.
I Play One On TV said, 8 months ago
@ima
I think that’s the point. If no one party has a clear majority, then the only way forward is to compromise and form coalitions. This prevents one party from hijacking policy, which I think even you can agree is contributing to gridlock. We cannot continue to kick the can down the road.
I would also like to remind all posters that it doesn’t help anyone’s argument to make the assumption that people who don’t think the way you do on one subject are always wrong all the time. Maybe Congress could learn this lesson as well.
ne7minder55 said, 8 months ago
@Movingsound
There will not be a serious third party & the reasons are simple.
Parties are hard work. They need dedicated people who care all year every year about advancing their party. The people calling for a third party have never been that dedicated, instead the form around some magic weenie (Parot, Nader, Ventura) and believe what they want about that person with no idea what they would actually do.
Imagine a third party President after what we have watched the GOP do to Obama the last 4 years. Now not only would the GOP be grinding everything to a halt they would have help from Dems. It would be a disaster.
JmcaRice
said, 8 months ago
its too bad Obama is not a moderate.
Bruce4671 said, 8 months ago
Didn’t we always know that Mitt was an “in the middle” kind of guy? He is willing to work with others and come to an agreement that may not thrill everyone but can move the venture forward. It’s what a leader does.