With a sticky tentacle in the media in every major city on the planet, Mr. Holbert Murdoch’s got a nerve implying that HILARY’S the octopus.
Name calling is used by those that have lost their argument.
Ha ha Democrats ain’t human. What does that imply?
To me, it implies that they’ve run out of even the farcical trash they’ve been throwing at the Clintons since they first showed their faces, and now they’re dropping even the pretense of not being in Fantasyland.
There were some arguments made against Romney because he was rich. Were those valid arguments? Both sides will come up with ridiculous arguments against the others candidate. This is just typical.
For myself, I don’t want Hilary for several reasons. I wasn’t impressed with how she handled the attempt to get ‘Hilarycare’ through congress. I was not impressed by her run as Secretary of State. Lastly, I don’t think she would try to find common ground with the Right. One of the biggest problems we have is the way extremeists on each side are controlling their parties. We need someone who will try to bridge the gap. Not deepen it. Having said all that, I’ll acknowledge the Repubs don’t have a candidate worth spit either. But then this is 2014. I’m hoping one of the parties can come up with a decent candidate in two years time.
So someone has to qualify for President before they can comment on the President?
Hillary is not the most unqualified person to run for President, Obama is.
I don’t want another Clinton, and I don’t want another Bush. It pains me that both major parties can’t see past nepotism with respect to the presidential race.
Alright. Fair enough. My apologies for misunderstanding your meaning.
Not an alien … looks like an octopus behind the rostrum to me … and that is an insult to the octopus …