Jen Sorensen by Jen Sorensen

Jen SorensenNo Zoom

Recommended

Comments (30) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    ‘“Fracking” has been around for quite a while, and caused a lot of damage in several western states, contaminated range, poisoned streams, and other damage. The fluids are not safe, but “proprietary”, so the law allows them to hide what they put in those fluids. Going back some time, look up numerous articles in “High Country News” and other sources. Our pursuit of “energy” for "lifestyle’, as opposed to actual need has long been profitable for corporations, and disastrous for many areas of the environment. From dams to fracking, “energy” has long sucked the life force from the planet, above, and below ground, and in our oceans.

  2. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, 10 months ago

    Then don’t use natural gas, petroleum or coal.
    Take the family on vacation on a bicycle, heat your home by rubbing your hands together and type your comments on a wind powered computer.
    Then maybe you could start telling others how to live.

  3. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    BS anti propaganda

  4. Hawthorne

    Hawthorne GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    @ConserveGov

    “Then maybe you could start telling others how to live.”

    If we don’t start cleaning up the environment, nobody is going to be telling anybody how to live, because there are limits to the toxic burden our bodies can handle.

    It’s not an ‘either/or’ choice; keep poisoning the environment or go back to carrying water in a bucket. The only reason the argument is framed that way is to keep people from demanding that the environment be cleaned up. And the only people who benefit from it are the poisoners; certainly driving a gas guzzler five blocks to buy a case of beer isn’t going to prevent the food and water from poisoning you.

    Your computer doesn’t care how the power that runs it is generated. It runs as happily on wind power as nuclear or coal power. The only difference is the health and well being of you and yours.

    Since it’s not necessary to revert to the stone age by cleaning up the environment and converting to cleaner power, why would you oppose cleaner power?

  5. omQ Release the Desaparecidos

    omQ Release the Desaparecidos said, 10 months ago

    @ConserveGov

    Whereas you’re telling your children, grandchildren to deal with living in an ever more toxic dump. But hey, you got to “live” it up.

  6. JohnnyDiego

    JohnnyDiego said, 10 months ago

    @ConserveGov

    What? You worry? Nah. You’ll be long dead and gone before we’ve killed off the earth.

  7. Gregory Kruse

    Gregory Kruse GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    It still takes two oxygen atoms to fuse with one carbon atom to make carbon dioxide. It doesn’t matter if the carbon is in the form of coal, gasoline, or gas.

  8. rmacprivate

    rmacprivate GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    It never ceases to amaze me that even intelligent people that can see and understand most of the complex issue’s confronting society today can’t see the writing on the wall when it comes to energy.

    Renewable energy folks! Get over it. We’re going to have to make the switch. Why the resistance to doing it, just because it’s not as cheap as fossil derived fuels at the moment. Waiting until the last drop of oil, or piece of coal is gone isn’t the best way of doing the job properly.

  9. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    “What do you mean, you don’t want us pumping secret chemicals into the ground near your water supply? It’s safe, because we say it is! And if you can’t trust the big energy companies, who CAN you trust?!”

  10. Tim Culberson

    Tim Culberson said, 10 months ago

    Nuclear is the best option

  11. Newenglandah

    Newenglandah said, 10 months ago

    @Tim Culberson

    “Nuclear is the best option”

    If you discount hazardous waste and the prospect of nuclear material getting into the wrong (i.e., terrorists) hands.

  12. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 10 months ago

    @ConserveGov

    What it means is that we should be moving the heavens and the earth to get off of a dirty, limited and damaging form of energy. 300 years is enough, don’t you think?

  13. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 10 months ago

    @Gregory Kruse

    It does matter all that sequestered carbon in coal and oil millions of years ago is being released now, extra amounts. Methane is 25 times the effects of CO2 per atom.

  14. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 10 months ago

    @Tim Culberson

    Nuclear is the other worst option. Waste that we can’t protect ourselves from, some of the half lives are in thousands even millions of years. No company will insure it, only the awful govt. Why so against solar, wind, tidal power? Cheaper, cleaner and anyone can own it.

  15. Karyl Miller

    Karyl Miller GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    Fabulous. Funny and true!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (15).