Jen Sorensen by Jen Sorensen

Jen SorensenNo Zoom

Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    Conservatives are not into conservation.

  2. ChukLitl

    ChukLitl GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    The current hate campaign against Mrs. Obama for saying that people should eat healthier is ridiculous. She’s a Mom, that’s what good ones do. She’s not a government official & she’s not writing laws, & she’s okay with eating ribs sometimes.

  3. nighthawks

    nighthawks GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    a sardonic smile accompanied by a slow shake of the head and an audible sigh

  4. RaiseMoreHell

    RaiseMoreHell said, about 3 years ago

    Perkins is a little too liberal to be a rep from Idaho, unless maybe he’s one of Larry Craig’s special friends.

    The people who founded American conservatism like Russell Kirk and Richard Weaver were definitely for conservation, but that got thrown out in the reign of the puppet president, Alzheimer Ronny. All the GOP and half the Democrats are for corptocracy. Left and Right isn’t the issue, it’s Top and Bottom.

  5. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, about 3 years ago

    The Corporate Top is our Rock Bottom and it shows. If they had their way we would have no regulations, civil laws based upon Leviticus, and an even larger more integrated Military Industrial complex in our society and the rest of the world.

  6. Rob

    Rob said, about 3 years ago

    @Tigger

    My day wouldn’t be complete without a snide, yet pointless statement from Tig. The issue behind the cartoon, dear Tig, is the corporate rape of the environment. Yes, politicians have been padding bills since time began, and it’s wrong when either party does it. Be that as it may, the real issue of all four panels is the en-vir-on-ment. Sound out the big words and you’ll get there in time…

  7. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, about 3 years ago

    We can live without corporate ownership of our country, but we can’t live without a clean environment. That will kill us all.

  8. BrianCrook

    BrianCrook said, about 3 years ago

    The wealthy own—OWN—the Teapublican Party. The American People must ignore the spew from the plutocrats’ rightstream media and vote out these pathetic Teapublican pawns.

  9. Lewreader

    Lewreader said, about 3 years ago

    Lord, don’t mention that 2nd Amendment nuts were the original conservation movement. Don’t let the Libs know Audubon shot over 100 birds for everyone he painted. For Christ’s sake don’t mention the Boy Scouts have taught conservation for a century and a half because they don’t want gays giving moral values to our kids. Conservation—conservative, naw, couldn’t be.
    The advantage of organic fuel it can be stored. FDR had a brilliant Idea to harness the 50 foot tides of Maine. Someone asked, "Will the power be there when you want it. We need power at peak, not 7 PM. Solar, wind, can you promise me power at 3 PM when we need it? Coal, gas, and oil is dependable. The power plant can crank the power when the people and businesses need it. Is the wind going to blow harder in a heat wave?
    Ethonal was a great unthought of idea. Less MPG, more exhaust pollution, more ground pollution (tons of nitrogen) and the poor can’t afford to eat. Brilliant. Sweeten the stupid idea with government substidies. Love it.
    Wood, renewable energy. Towns across America passing laws against outdoor furnances. I guess it’s child labor to tell chop wood. Drive him to Burger Butt and don’t forget to throw the wrappers out the window. At least your not giving your kid physical and moral exercise. Terrible, chopping wood.
    Do you drive? Why? Oh, you would live near work but you don’t want your kids exposed to us poor people and people of color. You have a nice green lawn without chemicles and mowing? Er, what happened to your old roof material when you had it replaced.. Do you use one white or black trash bags? Four?
    You liberal hypocrites discust me. Green yea! Unless it easier to ignore. How many in your car pool. How long you wait for the train/bus? I know, your time is too important.

  10. MisngNOLA

    MisngNOLA said, about 3 years ago

    @BrianCrook

    And the wealthy (George Soros, Warren Buffet, et al…) don’t OWN the Democrat Party? Take a minute and think about this Mr Crook, how did George Soros make his money? Did he start a corporation which manufactures things and creates jobs? Or did he play currency games and banking regulations to his billionaire advantage? Same with Warren Buffet, playing the market and manipulating currecnies and negotiable instruments. These are the very people who have essentially killed the US and the world’s economy. But you conveniently always seem to forget how rich they are and how they OWN, yes OWN the Deomcrat party.

  11. BrianCrook

    BrianCrook said, about 3 years ago

    Nola, I am no fan of the lily-livered Democratic Party (your remark, by the way, wants help in both spelling & grammar: “Democrat” is a noun; “Democratic”, an adjective), but two wealthy men hardly comprise the plutocracy that owns the Republican Party, a fact that you don’t deny, thank you very much.

    If Warren Buffett owns the Democratic Party, then why does it press to raise his taxes? Although the Democratic Party is also too close to the rich and too far from the oppressed, working-, & middle-classes, it certainly doesn’t behave as if it is owned lock, stock, & barrel by the rich, and one cannot say the same for the Republicans.

    As to your maligning of Soros & Buffett, they have certainly employed a great many people, and they continue to help employ people worldwide. More importantly, please disabuse yourself of the notion that the rich create the jobs. We have just finished a decade of rampant greed combined with the lowest tax rates in a century, and the job growth was the worst since World War II. Lower tax rates do NOT decrease unemployment.

  12. BrianCrook

    BrianCrook said, about 3 years ago


    Nola, I am no fan of the lily-livered Democratic Party (your remark, by the way, wants help in both spelling & grammar: “Democrat” is a noun; “Democratic”, an adjective), but two wealthy men hardly compare to the plutocracy that owns the Republican Party, a fact that you don’t deny, thank you very much.

    If Warren Buffett owns the Democratic Party, then why does it press to raise his taxes? Although the Democratic Party is also too close to the rich and too far from the oppressed, working-, & middle-classes, it certainly doesn’t behave as if it is owned lock, stock, & barrel by the rich, and one cannot say the same for the Republicans.

    As to your maligning of Soros & Buffett, they have certainly employed a great many people, and they continue to help employ people worldwide. More importantly, please disabuse yourself of the notion that the rich create the jobs. We have just finished a decade of rampant greed combined with the lowest tax rates in a century, and the job growth was the worst since World War II. Lower tax rates do NOT decrease unemployment.

    A last note on employment: If you expect that the rich create jobs, then you must hate Mitt Romney, who has gotten richer while cutting jobs: 385 at American Pad & Paper, 2000 at Dade International, & 2100 at DDI Corporation.

  13. Lewreader

    Lewreader said, about 3 years ago

    @BrianCrook

    Morning BRIAN. I guess Warren won’t be paying too many taxes anyway, seeing that he took the pledge to give away half his billions. What do you tithe, tithe? Anything? But he may have to pay if the Democrats get their way and abolish charitable contributions deduction for the wealth only (sound discriminary against a minority?) This means the government will donate your money to who they want, not who you want. Many institutes of higher education and hospitals will close without private donations, but Washington knows best.
    You liberals really like to twist Mitt Romney’s record on that layoff. Was the company really in his hands when the my butt, he made a sale and the buyer made the layoffs. That has been so distorted.layoffs came? Yeah but

  14. Lewreader

    Lewreader said, about 3 years ago

    @Lewreader

    Morning BRIAN That mean old Warren trying to avoid taxes. You know that cheat pledged to give away half his billions just so the Fed couldn’t get their hands on it. Yup, he’d rather support institutions of higher learning, and hospitals than let the government give it to tree legged toads. The Democrats have a plan to abolish rich people (discriminating against a minority) giving away money. Under this brilliant plan, only Washington could give away our money because as every liberal knows, they know better than us.
    Mitt Romney, sold unproductive plants in his company. The new owner had layoffs. I guess Mitt should have been psychic. Clo0sing an unprofitable ploant. I know, a liberal would have kept it open as a tax dodge.
    Some people believe everything they read in the Daily Worker, NYT, Pravda, and the Washinton Post. Try the WSJ for a chamge. Might be slanted a little but the numbers are on target.

  15. BrianCrook

    BrianCrook said, about 3 years ago


    Lew, I saw my name in your remarks, and I broke my rule & began reading them, but you were obviously drunk when you wrote them—or you are utterly incoherent when sober.

    In either case, they are inarticulate to the point of unintelligibility. I feel increasingly sorry for you and for anyone who must listen to your rants.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (1).