Jeff Danziger by Jeff Danziger

Jeff Danziger

Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Radish, on Sherpa

    Radish, on Sherpa GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    You’d think Huckabee could get his mind off of sex once in awhile.

  2. martens is REALLY fed up

    martens is REALLY fed up said, about 2 years ago

    Excellent “Snerk!” in this ’toon from Danziger!

  3. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, about 2 years ago

    @martens is REALLY fed up

    Those “men” commit at least 90+% of the rapes in the world! And rape of women is just as much about power over others as it is about sex (most studies of rape show it as even more about power, but I am being conservative here). So, just who then has the more testosterone and the libido that produces it???

  4. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 2 years ago

    Despite the fact that I disagree with his politics, I like Mr. Huckabee; he seems a likable person for the most part. My favorite scene with him (speaking of women/libido/etc.) was when I saw him play the bass (and he’s pretty good at it, too) with Ted Nugent, playing “Cat Scratch Fever”. If you don’t see the irony of a Baptist preacher playing that song, I recommend you read the lyrics.

  5. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Four months ago, a member of the IT dept and his fiancée transferred to our facility from another state. Two months later, she angerly stormed out of the office. She had just found out he was sleeping with the receptionist. It ain’t just women with uncontrollable libidos.

  6. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 2 years ago

    There’s libido and libidon’t.

  7. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, about 2 years ago

    and for those who qant the truth – not just to be seen as “correct”:

    “Our party stands for the recognition of the equality of women and the capacity of women,” Huckabee told his audience at the Republican National Committee’s winter meeting in downtown Washington. “That’s not a war on them. It’s a war for them. And if the Democrats want to insult the women of America by making them believe that they are helpless without Uncle Sugar coming in and providing for them a prescription each month for birth control, because they cannot control their libido or their reproductive system without the help of the government, then so be it.”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/23/mike-huckabee-women_n_4653426.html

  8. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 2 years ago

    @Bruce4671

    I haven’t really commented on this topic (except for a little joke) because I find it hard to take Huckabee seriously. I do agree that he never said that women can’t control their libido; he said that Democrats think that women can’t control their libido. So he’s slandering Democrats. But underneath his comment there seems to be an assumption that there is something wrong with sexual pleasure. If prescription drugs are going to be covered by insurance, and if birth control pills are prescription drugs, then why shouldn’t birth control pills be covered? Oh, because they allow people to, you know, have sex. Oooh, that’s nasty. There also seems to be some implication that birth control pills are mainly for, you know, loose women. In my experience, which is, I admit, limited, there are married women who use birth control pills, maybe more than “loose” women. I have no complaint if a married woman chooses to exercise her libido and take birth control pills. Evidently this concept is a little beyond our friend Mr. Huckabee. (I also have no problem if an unmarried woman wants to exercise her libido.)

  9. martens is REALLY fed up

    martens is REALLY fed up said, about 2 years ago

    @lonecat

    Actually, lonecat, I think that Alexandra Petri in the WashPost" had the best take on Huckabee’s speech. It’s like there were no women in the room or they weren’t able to hear/understand what was being discussed. THAT is a major problem for the Republicans IMHO.

  10. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 2 years ago

    @martens is REALLY fed up

    Thanks, martens; a good article. I enjoyed also the comments to her article; here’s one of them:
    “This is Huckabee’s family planning policy position: “Cross your legs, ladies. I KNOW you can do it! I have faith in your strength, your smarts, and your integrity. Don’t let anyone tell you you’re weak! Don’t let them drag you down and cast aspersions on your virtue and intelligence! Keep your legs crossed, and fight the power!”
    Seriously. This is what he’s saying. He’s doing this because he loves us, ladies. He loves us even more than we love ourselves. WE CAN DO IT!
    Huckabee, you really must think we’re stupid."

  11. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, about 2 years ago

    @lonecat

    As you know, I am not particularly taken with religion in general as I see it as the root cause of all the terrible things done to our fellow humans. However, I am a spiritual person and wallow in the inconsistency.

    God is a concept and – if the scientific process is ever completed – scientist will “discover” that we are all part of, combined with, dependent on “God” for survival. Simply stated God IS the Universe. As we are constructed of those items that appeared at the inception of the universe – when matter compressed so far that destruction was eminent and since by law matter can not be destroyed only converted to energy and back again …… BOOM.

    Anyway… back on topic …. yes Huckleberry has some strange ideas and yes women should be able to purchase the health care plan of their choice at a reasonable fee to include what ever birth control provision she desires, the fact still remains that it is the woman’s responsibility – not yours or mine – to provide such items.

    If we are to continue on as a species and prosper (live long and prosper my brother) we MUST be willing to afford one and all (planet wide) proper medical care. Not “including birth control” but an all inclusive care. The population must be controlled as well.

    But there is something basically “wrong” with killing your young to attain that end. I’m sure you agree.

    As individuals, we must elevate ourselves to the point that we can indeed control our base instincts (US “society” or “culture” is one of hedonism today) and adopt some simple ideas as guides to the future.

    Quit fighting. Boy the money the world wastes on “protecting” their “way of life” by the whole sale slaughter of innocents.

    Simply exercise principled “love of neighbor”.

    Sadly, I do not think humans are capable and so will not be allowed to survive.

  12. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 2 years ago

    @Bruce4671

    I have no objection if you want to say that God is the Universe. But God-the-Universe isn’t available for most of the things most people want him/her for — such as caring about human beings, providing a moral code, rewarding good people and punishing bad people, and guaranteeing life after death.

  13. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, about 2 years ago

    @lonecat

    And who says that the concept is a “he”?

    Dude, quit thinking in human terms. Get “out of the box” as they say. Look around you and think about what you see.

    What goes around comes around.

    EVERYTHING is a cycle./ Even the universe itself.

  14. martens is REALLY fed up

    martens is REALLY fed up said, about 2 years ago

    @Bruce4671

    Errmmm, Bruce? lonecat said “him/her”, not “him”. I really don’t think lonecat is in the box at all, but perhaps you are? What you seem to have said is that God is everything. In agreement with lonecat, that doesn’t seem to me to be very useful formulation. Where does consciousness, for example, come in if everything is God?

  15. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, about 2 years ago

    @martens is REALLY fed up

    well surly you have heard speculation concerning just when …say a computer … has sufficient processing power to become “self aware” right?

    think about it.

    humans are just a speck of processing power in the great universal computer that is part of “G.O.D.” there are seven billion of use who never ever ever use all of the approximate 86 billion neurons at the same time so …. share.

    Now any reasonable thinker would have to admit that with the billions of stars that have planets within the “Goldilocks” zone that would support life as we know it that the probability that similar life with similar brain capacities would be present on a percentage of them. More processing power ……

    Now considering that life NOT based on our requirements is also possible.

    See how that works?

    (let me go get another……..drink)

    now where was I….

  16. Load the rest of the comments (4).