Jeff Danziger by Jeff Danziger

Jeff Danziger

Comments (22) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. minos

    minos GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Ooof. Harsh.

    Needed to be said, though.

    The NRA is a terrorist organization. Repeal the 2nd Amendment.

  2. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    The Republican party of NO blocks everything.

  3. Walrus Gumbo

    Walrus Gumbo GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    NRA, The Audacity of Nope!

  4. Stipple

    Stipple said, about 2 years ago

    “We go through this legislation “war” after every tragedy and nothing changes"
    .
    Our opinions are so close on this one we could have had the same mother.
    .
    Let us change things and quit going through this time after time.
    Write your congressman with that message.

  5. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Projecting yourself!

  6. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Guns kill more citizens annually in America than all the combined deaths of all terrorism worldwide. Tom Diaz,, The Last Gun

  7. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 2 years ago

    There IS room between “doing nothing” and “taking away everyone’s guns”. Why do people have such a blind spot on the subject?

  8. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, about 2 years ago

    minos: Read Madison’s Notes to see what the thinking was just prior to adding the Bill of Rights. It wasn’t to let thugs and loonies go around killing people. It was to “ensure domestic tranquility” and “provide for the common defense” without the use of the systems of tyranny in use in Europe at the time: conscription, mercenaries, and a large standing army.
    Just implement the first part of the amendment – the part the Nazi Revolutionary Army wants you to forget – the main part of the Constitution defines the “well-regulated” part (Article II, Section 2). It was used by Eisenhower during the Faubus Insurrection.

  9. Hawthorne

    Hawthorne said, about 2 years ago

    We already have adequate gun control. It’s not being enforced.

    Before we start screaming for /new/ laws, shouldn’t we enforce the ones we have? Why would we think new laws would be better enforced?

    Beware the effect of unintended consequences.

  10. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    @I Play One On TV

    “Why do people have such a blind spot on the subject?”


    Because you are a rational person who is guided by logic and reason, I will go through the litany of information that skews the argument to such an “all or nothing” level.


    The talking points politically are nobody wants to ban guns, just control the A/R, high cap mags etc. Unfortunately that is only part of the dialog that is published. Politicians regularly from the President on down are quoted at various times espousing prohibition solutions and talking about gun control as “this is just a first step in the process.” In California (my domicile) the politicians are not even subtle, they regularly talk about banning guns, all of them. Diane Fienstien, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, all California democrats are quite outspoken on the subject when they aren’t facing a national camera. The discussions here on the boards of GC and other sites regularly push arguments for confiscation or prohibition that goes way beyond the current discussion. When you read or listen to the “official” gun control organizations they speak regularly of total confiscation/prohibition as a solution.


    last night I listened to the California Senate Committee on Health and Safety considering 12 bills on gun control. Some are just being recycled and have already been vetoed by our governor (Brown) last year. They tweak the language and hope that they can push it through this year. Some of the controls they want to institute are totally unrealistic and would be cost prohibitive to implement. One on ammunition licenses and reporting ammunition purchases was already tried and rejected by the ATF in the late 80’s.


    Bor’s cartoon reflects this attitude very well. We have to do something! So we will pass laws that are ineffective at addressing the real problems of violence in our culture. I hope i shed some light on your question.

  11. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Ten times the number killed in Boston, EVERY DAY in America with gun violence. What IS terrorism, and who sponsors it?

  12. remrafdn

    remrafdn said, about 2 years ago

    Typical “bovine scatology”.

  13. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release said, about 2 years ago

    @dtroutma

    The NRA.

  14. tauyen

    tauyen said, about 2 years ago

    To those who say we have ‘adequete’ gun control already – you are wrong! Maybe we have enough laws, but if they aren’t enforced then by defination the efforts of gun control are inadequete. It is time to a) develop comprehensive regulations and b) enforce them all and all the time.

  15. cjr53

    cjr53 said, about 2 years ago

    @I Play One On TV

    “There IS room between “doing nothing” and “taking away everyone’s guns”. Why do people have such a blind spot on the subject?”


    Because that is what they would do when they have an issue they don’t like and want to control it, nay eliminate it. Such as abortion and equal marriage rights.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (7).