Jeff Danziger by Jeff Danziger

Jeff DanzigerNo Zoom

Comments (13) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Harolynne

    Harolynne GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    Exactly! “And stop your bitching about not making the same amount as men – you aren’t men and therefore aren’t deserving.” See, I did read the decision.

  2. bdaverin

    bdaverin said, over 5 years ago

    Thomas’ conflict of interest ought to leave him only employable as a WalMart greeter!

  3. Justice22

    Justice22 said, over 5 years ago

    I see Thomas is still worried about pubic hairs on his Coke can….. LOL

  4. toto39

    toto39 said, over 5 years ago

    If male employees are so much more expensive than female employees, how do male employees ever get a job?

  5. Carolo1

    Carolo1 said, over 5 years ago

    @Justice22

    HA HA

  6. Carolo1

    Carolo1 said, over 5 years ago

    @toto39

    Good ol boys

  7. T.E. Lawrence

    T.E. Lawrence said, over 5 years ago

    I never patronize Walmart, read the blog site, Walmartwatch.org. It’s scary to see what they’re really like.

  8. Virgil Kemp

    Virgil Kemp GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    what a shame . . . .
    I wanted to see all 2,000,000 complaintants testify.
    Sorry the lawyers missed their pay day.

  9. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    Thomas is just Scalia’s “uncle” on every vote.

  10. jim steel

    jim steel said, over 5 years ago

    @Harolynne

    AMEN TO THAT

  11. jim steel

    jim steel said, over 5 years ago

    If we stop this Bull_Crap, Our lives would be simpler, lets be thankfull for what we have..
    Look at The GREEDY US LAWSUITS are ruining our lives and making it un-affordable……..

  12. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, over 5 years ago

    Noonan: So you went into ONE Wal-Mart? Yeah, THERE’S good data. In fact, Wal-Mart employees are 66% female, but the managers only 33%. That is significant by any standard. Except the Roberts Court.
    They did NOT say the case was unjustified, they just said they don’t qualify as a class.

  13. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    ^ one of the great misconceptions on all sides when cases go before SCOTUS is establishing standing, not necessarily whether a Constitutional violation has occurred. If they don’t choose to hear the case, or return it to lower courts, or find a lack of standing (like class action), doesn’t mean the case is “settled”.

  14. Refresh Comments.