Comments (16) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   jkshaw said, about 1 month ago

   I don’t think that’s the type of mopping up the President was hoping the Republicans would help with. Still, it fits. I remember a very fat cat during the Great Depression advising in no uncertain terms what the US should liquidate – among which was labor. Among whom was my father.

   Great depiction as usual, Mr. Danziger. Or rather, awful.

2. 

   scottfreitas said, about 1 month ago

   Reality IS what it IS.

   Stop voting for a Demoncrat congress if you want a good economy…

3. 

   NeoconMan said, about 1 month ago

   You are right, scottfreitas: We must return a Republican congress who understands the necessity of sacrificing the lower class laborer to keep the American economy strong and growing. All the short-sighted Democrats do is try to help the working man. They must be stopped.

4. 

   nemesis-of-empire said, about 1 month ago

   How come the greater good seems to come to fewer, and richer, people?

5. 

   cdward said, about 1 month ago

   Just for reflection: ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brethren, you did it to me.’

6. 

   believecommonsense said, about 1 month ago

   nemesis, two thumbs up, ‘cept we’re not supposed to notice little things like that, we’re just supposed to worry about those evil socialists …. or maybe they’re marxists …. no, they’re communists …. no, they’re socialists …..

7. 

   Comicfan1028 said, about 1 month ago

   Neocon, the democrats are “helping” us to death

8. 

   Wildcard24365 said, about 1 month ago

   @cdward: Amen. Here beginneth the lesson.

9. 

   longtimecomicsfan said, about 1 month ago

   I understand there are some inequities out there with the bankers and all, but it just really steams you guys that the economy is recovering as a direct result of government stimulus, after it tanked as a direct result of Republican deregulation, huh?

10. 

    Corosive Frog said, about 1 month ago

    That looks like a plague…

    I made a study in my religious sciences class about Ramses the second being the pharaoh of the exodus and the monotheist pharaoh Akhenaten being inspired by the hebrews and my estimate (based on the genealogy at the beginning of Matthew) showed it was quite possible. Interesting enough, after Ramses the second, Egypt ‘s status began to decline. The kingdom of the pharaohs would never be the same again.

11. 

    DrCanuck said, about 1 month ago

    Froggie, what are “religious sciences”?

12. 

    shane damit said, about 1 month ago

    Anandy where do I get a picture of you with the triple six on your forhead, that would just be adorable.

13. 

    Corosive Frog said, about 1 month ago

    study of the religious phenomenon; study of the similarities and differences between religions, history of religions, psychology of religions…
    I guess it’s closer to being a discipline of psychology. Of the three teachers I had on this subject, one had a PhD in psychology, one had a master’s in psychology and one had a PhD in theology. The theologian contributed to the investigation on the Morin Heights massacre (see Order of the Solar Temple, it is pretty much the french-speaking world’s Waco).

    Just because psychology studies religion doesn’t mean it considers it a mental illness. Psychology is not the study of mental illnesses, it’s the study of human behavior in general. All psychological phenomenons are worth being studied. Religion and faith are psychological phenomenons, so they are studied, just as love, motivation, learning and power.

14. 

    annamargaret1866 said, about 1 month ago

    Just read this one at “9 Chickweed Lane”: “Special Theory of Cartoon Physics: For every cartoon created in the universe, there is an equal and opposite imbecile to object to it.”

15. 

    believecommonsense said, about 1 month ago

    well, I don’t know if they’re all equal imbeciles …

16. 

    DrCanuck said, 29 days ago

    Froggie, I teach a university course in the psychology of religion. I had just never heard the field described in those terms. With “religious” as the adjectival modifier of “sciences,” the name was conjuring up all sorts of nightmares in me. (As in “creation sciences.”)