Comments (8) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   jkshaw said, almost 4 years ago

   We had a 1953 Fiat van in the early 1960s, towed it full of belongings to Utah in 1966. It finally died in 1969. We felt great affection for the old gray thing.
2. 

   dtroutma said, almost 4 years ago

   Interesting that it was an early post-war Fiat, part of European recovery after the area was devastated. Fiat Abarth cars a few years later were very fast and slightly more reliable. Early DKWs with three cylinder engines and front wheel driver were also unique. That’s the company we now call Audi. Maybe the fact that U.S. car companies went backward while other countries moved forward has something to do with the current status?
3. 

   believecommonsense said, almost 4 years ago

   can somebody enlighten me about this toon? what’s the deal with Ginsberg?
4. 

   J. said, almost 4 years ago

   Ginsburg has previously shunned the appeal on the Chrysler-Fiat deal.
5. 

   believecommonsense said, almost 4 years ago

   Cpt, actually Justice Ginsburg issued a stay of the Chrysler-Fiat deal to allow the Supreme Court to decide whether it wanted to hear the appeal or not. Later, the Court choose not to hear the appeal.

   I still don’t get this toon.
6. 

   MacZenWES said, almost 4 years ago

   Her previous experience with a Fiat was the reason she wanted to stop the merger?
7. 

   Tigger said, almost 4 years ago

   Seems perfect fit for Chrysler
8. 

   J. said, almost 4 years ago

   Well, I for one, do not look forward to the days of driving a car the size of a Fiat cupholder. Ecology, be damned!
9. Refresh Comments.