Jeff Danziger by Jeff Danziger

?fh=d1f6c11dbc5b0672caacd6c79e68e49e

Comments (9) Jump to Comments Form

  1. HUMPHRIES

    HUMPHRIESGenius_badge said, 8 months ago

    A dire prediction from ANandy world. Maybe it will, maybe it won’t but a “NO-NO” attiude definately won’t produce anything.

  2. teaguemj

    teaguemj said, 8 months ago

    They will, they did, they don’t understand what they are doing.

  3. Corosive Frog

    Corosive Frog said, 8 months ago

    Civil serfdom doesn’t exist yet, the debt does.

  4. deadheadzan

    deadheadzanGenius_badge said, 8 months ago

    Where were all the complaints about the debt run up from the Iraq war? I find it very ironic that we borrowed all this money from Communist Red China!

  5. believecommonsense

    believecommonsenseGenius_badge said, 8 months ago

    there is truth in this toon and it started a long time ago — the war in Afghanistan and Iraq was run on credit; the U.S. ‘borrowed’ funds from Social Security a long time ago and has never replaced them back where they belonged; yes, more credit is being run up, and it is scary, but it is being done to try to stop us from sinking into a depression … the two reasons I cited above had no such rationale behind them …
    I believe all levels of government need to adjust to the new reality and cut budgets, eliminating things that are extraneous and non-productive … and there will be big disagreements on where those cuts should be made

  6. Simon_Jester

    Simon_Jester said, 8 months ago

    Quit whining ANandy…you righties WANTED the rich to get their tax cuts, war or no war.

    And this is what happens.

  7. gbrucewilson

    gbrucewilson said, 8 months ago

    The “Bush tax cuts” increased tax revenues. Increasing taxes will lower tax revenues. The Bush/Obama bailout money has already exceeded all the money spent on the Iraq war. If the government had not “wasted” the money on Iraq, they would have wasted it on other things. Thank God Obama is going to stop spending on Pork (some day).

  8. Simon_Jester

    Simon_Jester said, 8 months ago

    Got some figures to back up those claim GBruce?

    Or are we just supposed to accept ‘em coz YOU said so?

  9. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, 8 months ago

    gbw: wrong on both counts. Or all three counts. The Bush tax cuts did not increase government revenues. And it has been decisively shown that “trickle down” never does – it consolidates money in the hands of the richest, and increases the gap between rich and poor. In Reagan’s day, the top 1% owned 9% of America’s wealth. In 2007, it owned 22%. Thanks to Reagan and Bush tax cuts.