Jack Ohman by Jack Ohman

Jack Ohman

Comments (7) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. JAMES HICKMAN

    JAMES HICKMAN GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Right on.

  2. rossevrymn

    rossevrymn said, over 1 year ago

    doubt it

  3. NeoconMan

    NeoconMan said, over 1 year ago

    ^ I doubt it too. The Founding Fathers would have stood very firm on the government’s right to control the lives of citizens that chose to make decisions concerning their own lives.


    Especially women.

  4. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    They would, if keeping up their ethics with the “advance” of civilization since their time.

  5. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, over 1 year ago

    @ReasonsVentriloquist

    Well said. I would add that the procedure to enact a filibuster is now much easier — and it should not be — which means you don’t actually HAVE to filibuster, as Wendy did. Read the rules: she was not allowed to leave her place even for a bathroom break, or to eat a bite; she was not allowed to go off topic at all (and was accused falsely of doing so twice) — in the US Congress it amounts to saying “oh, I’m filibustering.” “Oh, okay, we now need 60 votes to stop you.”
    It is a genuine tyranny of the minority going on here.

  6. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, over 1 year ago

    Oh, and my man John Adams (on the far right), would definitely have stood with Wendy. Abigail would have made sure of that.

  7. rossevrymn

    rossevrymn said, over 1 year ago

    @NeoconMan

    It’s called competing rights. That’s always an issue, genius.

  8. Refresh Comments.