Inspector Danger's Crime Quiz by Werner Wejp-Olsen
- March 02, 2013
- Previous feature
-
- Next feature
- Current

Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Customize Homepage
Daily Comics Email
Comment, share, interact with other comic fans
INSPECTOR DANGER’S CRIME-QUIZ Do you love whodunit-mysteries? Are you a Columbo-fan? Would you like to be a detective too? Here’s your chance. The comic strip “Inspector Danger’s Crime-Quiz” by Werner Wejp-Olsen, world-renowned cartoonist, is a crime-puzzle challenging armchair sleuths of both genders and all ages to activate their Sherlock Holmes-gene to figure out the right solution and solve the case. The main characters are the tough and rough Inspector Danger, all criminals’ worst nightmare, and Alfie, his dim-witted assistant and still a rookie after seven years on the force. In just a few panels, a whole mystery plot is being presented with a number of suspects and clues for the reader to check out and by deduction come up with the right solution to the crime. These mysteries span from cold-blooded murders, safecracking and bank robbery to art thefts, kidnapping and every now and then even a Peeping Tom – all presented with a humorous twist. But in each strip – in each case, the reader has all the suspects and clues needed to come up with the right answer – and as a safety devise – a solution (printed upside down - sorry!).
DISCLAIMER All characters appearing in this comic strip are fictitious. Any resemblance to the real world, real crime scenes and actual criminals is purely coincidental, unintentional and not to be taken too literally.
To quote a famous Grook by Piet Hein:
“Taking fun as simply fun
and earnestness in earnest
shows how thoroughly
thou none of the two discernest.”
By the way - no animals were harmed during the production of this comic strip.
Werner Wejp-Olsen - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2013. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy

Comments (14) (Please sign in to comment)
adddennisw4 said, 3 months ago
but the wind can change.
BartJ385 said, 3 months ago
Werner wins this round. Nicely done!
Bruno Zeigerts said, 3 months ago
I still think my solution was valid … it is possible to have more than one clue in a case!
Not that I’m a sore loser or anything!
Tue Elung-Jensen said, 3 months ago
Makes less sense than just saying the rain would have washed away the tracks. Also agree that the wind can change – so the simplest solution is not allways the right one.
Michael McMillan said, 3 months ago
Besides— the sci-fi author was trying too hard. The last panel before the inspector turned on him would have been proof enough of that. Now, I wonder “for sure” how it was done? Wrenches for the “footprints”? A plate pressed into the ground for the “landing gear”? A child in a costume for the “alien”? The hardest part is the window— it’s not easy burning a hole in the window without shattering it.
Wolind Quark said, 3 months ago
@BartJ385
I think I agree with you there. It’s interesting how all the big, obvious things make you overlook the small.
SeaFox10 said, 3 months ago
You left out the clue, that there is no aliens!
GoodQuestion
said, 3 months ago
Would be nice if Danger would explain the holes, footprints and tracks from the spaceship. So far all he has is a picture that shows rain coming from a different direction which is purely circomstantial . . . What are the facts?!? . . . ☻
WytZox1 said, 3 months ago
Videos can always be faked; sci-fi movies prove that. Unless the alleged creature can be captured only a fool and Shirley MacLaine would believe the video is real.
voluspaa said, 3 months ago
Got it right from day one, word by word. How’s that?
Rufus_T_Firefly
said, 3 months ago
Very cheap. The wind often shifts during storms. Totally implausible solution.
Michael McMillan said, 3 months ago
@SeaFox10
Hey! Not so fast there, speedy! I’ve already stated that I am an undocumented space alien.
Michael McMillan said, 3 months ago
Note: I said earlier the footprints look like an open-ended wrench. Nope, I was wrong. Take the rubber-bands off of a sling shot, and there you go.
BartJ385 said, 3 months ago
The good thing about this solution is this: very often, the clue is something that the murderer did or didn’t do that makes no sense. It leaves the reader saying “yeah, I get that this thing proves that Mr. X is the murderer – but why the hell did he do that in the first place?”
Here, the SciFi author went to a lot of trouble to create all the evidence that an alien has tried to kill him. He failed because of the only thing he couldn’t control.
Again, nicely done this time.