Inspector Danger's Crime Quiz by Werner Wejp-Olsen
- February 26, 2013
- Previous feature
-
- Next feature
- Current

Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Customize Homepage
Daily Comics Email
Comment, share, interact with other comic fans
INSPECTOR DANGER’S CRIME-QUIZ Do you love whodunit-mysteries? Are you a Columbo-fan? Would you like to be a detective too? Here’s your chance. The comic strip “Inspector Danger’s Crime-Quiz” by Werner Wejp-Olsen, world-renowned cartoonist, is a crime-puzzle challenging armchair sleuths of both genders and all ages to activate their Sherlock Holmes-gene to figure out the right solution and solve the case. The main characters are the tough and rough Inspector Danger, all criminals’ worst nightmare, and Alfie, his dim-witted assistant and still a rookie after seven years on the force. In just a few panels, a whole mystery plot is being presented with a number of suspects and clues for the reader to check out and by deduction come up with the right solution to the crime. These mysteries span from cold-blooded murders, safecracking and bank robbery to art thefts, kidnapping and every now and then even a Peeping Tom – all presented with a humorous twist. But in each strip – in each case, the reader has all the suspects and clues needed to come up with the right answer – and as a safety devise – a solution (printed upside down - sorry!).
DISCLAIMER All characters appearing in this comic strip are fictitious. Any resemblance to the real world, real crime scenes and actual criminals is purely coincidental, unintentional and not to be taken too literally.
To quote a famous Grook by Piet Hein:
“Taking fun as simply fun
and earnestness in earnest
shows how thoroughly
thou none of the two discernest.”
By the way - no animals were harmed during the production of this comic strip.
Werner Wejp-Olsen - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2013. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy

Comments (11) (Please sign in to comment)
adddennisw4 said, 3 months ago
THAT’S IT! THE SHAPES ON THE HOLE IN THE WALL, AND THE HOLE IN THE GLASS ARE DIFFERENT!
Jim Douglas said, 3 months ago
@adddennisw4
or ray guns go through windows ??
Wolind Quark said, 3 months ago
@Jim Douglas
Having just started a course on nuclear physics… how would a ray gun work anyway? What I’ve seen looks like it would be some sort of heavy ion, so it should destroy the window as well.
Not that I’m an expert or anything. Quite the contrary.
Bruno Zeigerts said, 3 months ago
He fired Ray .. who’s Ray?
Did he shoot Twice?
Who fired Twice?
joe piglet said, 3 months ago
I don’t see any crime yet, other than a nutcase wasting police time.
Homer D. Poe
said, 3 months ago
If it’s a light ray, it would pass through the glass.
GoodQuestion
said, 3 months ago
No glass on the floor under the window suggests an inside job . . . ☻
John Russco
said, 3 months ago
@Wolind Quark
You are expert enough to see through that foolishness.
ronald rini
said, 3 months ago
@Homer D. Poe
I am leaning with you and the shape should be the same with the window being smaller and the wall being bigger could be wrong
BartJ385 said, 3 months ago
@GoodQuestion
Well yeah, that would usually be the solution. But since it was a SciFi weapon, it can have any property, including it disintegrates glass and punches holes in walls. So we can’t use the clue of the missing shards.
JoviusGM said, 3 months ago
Hm… the holes contradict themselves, in my opinion. If it’s hot enough to melt glass, then the hole in the wall would be charred, as well. If it was a force blaster, it would punch a hole in the wall neatly, but the glass, depending on the amount of force and the speed therein, would have cracks coming from the point of impact. I guess we’ll see tomorrow.