Inspector Danger's Crime Quiz by Werner Wejp-Olsen
- December 03, 2012
- Previous feature
-
- Next feature
- Current

Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Customize Homepage
Daily Comics Email
Comment, share, interact with other comic fans
INSPECTOR DANGER’S CRIME-QUIZ Do you love whodunit-mysteries? Are you a Columbo-fan? Would you like to be a detective too? Here’s your chance. The comic strip “Inspector Danger’s Crime-Quiz” by Werner Wejp-Olsen, world-renowned cartoonist, is a crime-puzzle challenging armchair sleuths of both genders and all ages to activate their Sherlock Holmes-gene to figure out the right solution and solve the case. The main characters are the tough and rough Inspector Danger, all criminals’ worst nightmare, and Alfie, his dim-witted assistant and still a rookie after seven years on the force. In just a few panels, a whole mystery plot is being presented with a number of suspects and clues for the reader to check out and by deduction come up with the right solution to the crime. These mysteries span from cold-blooded murders, safecracking and bank robbery to art thefts, kidnapping and every now and then even a Peeping Tom – all presented with a humorous twist. But in each strip – in each case, the reader has all the suspects and clues needed to come up with the right answer – and as a safety devise – a solution (printed upside down - sorry!).
DISCLAIMER All characters appearing in this comic strip are fictitious. Any resemblance to the real world, real crime scenes and actual criminals is purely coincidental, unintentional and not to be taken too literally.
To quote a famous Grook by Piet Hein:
“Taking fun as simply fun
and earnestness in earnest
shows how thoroughly
thou none of the two discernest.”
By the way - no animals were harmed during the production of this comic strip.
Werner Wejp-Olsen - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2013. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy

Comments (15) (Please sign in to comment)
mrbribery said, 6 months ago
Exactly. And that’s why, in the second panel, he lowered his estimate to 119 MPH…
Kosaka Jinnai said, 6 months ago
@mrbribery
Apparently you never met my professors. One of them can ride at 135 mph without even a helmet or bandanna.
And my old mates in college could do that too. They took it up to 160 on the open freeway. I was there.
Wolind Quark said, 6 months ago
The more obvious thing is that at 119 mph, the driver would be pulp. the forces involved are collosal!
Tue Elung-Jensen said, 6 months ago
Because the visor couldn´t have been knocked open after the crash? Or for that matter who could have the visor down with a nose like that.
SeaFox10 said, 6 months ago
Ok, this one is crap! After a crash at that speed the visor probably wouldn’t be attached to the helmet!
The Wolf In Your Midst said, 6 months ago
@SeaFox10
After a crash at that speed (or even just enough to wreck the cruiser the way it’s shown), it’s a wonder his head is still attached to his shoulders!
(I’ve seen pictures of high-speed motorcycle accidents. Those forces do some pretty horrible things to the human body.)
BartJ385 said, 6 months ago
This is a bad one for a million reasons. One, the trooper’s plan is retarded. Did he think no one would find out what his relation to the biker was? Moronic. Then, a real trooper would open the visor after the crash (let’s just ignore the fact that the victim looks pretty good for a 119mph crash). And last, the victim would have crashed into the windscreen. That was what I thought this was about.
Homer D. Poe
said, 6 months ago
Can radar tell the speed when the car is also moving?
John Russco
said, 6 months ago
Wow aint we glad to have such a sharp inspector? Why do they keep putting this strip out there? d;~(
WytZox1 said, 6 months ago
Of course the visor could’ve flipped up upon impact. This was a lame 1. tsk tsk tsk …
Boise Ed
said, 6 months ago
The motorcycle went under the car, indicating that it laid down before impact, and yet the body apparently flew over the car. That makes no sense, either.
WileECoyote0001 said, 6 months ago
Troopers don’t use their radar guns while their car is in motion. And if he did, he would have to subtract his speed from the reading to get the bikers real speed in a head-on collision.
obeney2000
said, 6 months ago
And if he did hit at 120 he would be jelly.
rightisright said, 5 months ago
The moral is clear: never trust police.
F6F5Hellcat said, 4 months ago
Of course it’s murder. The bike is pratically under the left front tire of the car and the biker is supposedly going to end up behind the car after an accident like that? Not only is he behind the car, he’s much closer to the right side of the road, suggesting he was thrown more on the right side of the car though he should be closer to the left side of the road. And I don’t believe he ended up on the right side from hitting the windshield as their is no damage to the windshield. In fact at the two speeds claimed the cop car should show more damage and the biker would have slammed into the windshield, damaging it. The visor could have come up in the accident and would have been likely to be peeled off. And the cop claims the biker was doing 120 MPH but then immediately changes his story to exactly 119.