K M: Your friend was struck for cause. Since the questions always include something about made-up minds, he could be struck for cause, and if he says that in hearing of the venire, could be charged with contempt or even perjury depending on how he answered the prejudice question. My technique is to quote the Constitution at some relevant part of the voir dire. One side or the other will definitely use a peremptory on you, making minute improvement on the final jury.
K M: Your friend was struck for cause. Since the questions always include something about made-up minds, he could be struck for cause, and if he says that in hearing of the venire, could be charged with contempt or even perjury depending on how he answered the prejudice question. My technique is to quote the Constitution at some relevant part of the voir dire. One side or the other will definitely use a peremptory on you, making minute improvement on the final jury.