Glenn McCoy by Glenn McCoy

Glenn McCoyNo Zoom

Comments (25) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. comicgos

    comicgos said, over 4 years ago

    But VERY FRIENDLY pests!

  2. W(ar).Crime

    W(ar).Crime said, over 4 years ago

    ^Sounds like Churchillwasright alright.

  3. SpicyNacho

    SpicyNacho GoComics PRO Member said, over 4 years ago

    Clark, would you welcome Republican Senators from those states who were acting like whiny babies because they couldn’t get their way, or only Senators you agree with?

    I like how when Obama wins we are supposed to understand that elections have consequences and to just go along with the leadership, but these slacker Senators don’t have to do that.

  4. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, over 4 years ago

    Howy, go back to sleep and let the grown ups talk.

  5. jmattadams

    jmattadams GoComics PRO Member said, over 4 years ago

    I had skunks under my crawl space last year. I was lucky…I see from this that it could have been a lot worse.

  6. DjGuardian

    DjGuardian said, over 4 years ago

    Hey, at least the comic was funny.

    Send in the skunks!

  7. worldisacomic

    worldisacomic said, over 4 years ago

    In California the Democrats are hanging out in our wallets!

  8. Jade

    Jade GoComics PRO Member said, over 4 years ago

    I found the comic funny.

  9. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, over 4 years ago

    Spicy’s got a point. The only reason you guys are welcoming them in Chicago is because they are democrats. If it were republicans, you guys would kick ‘em in the rear so hard they’d taste your shoelaces. I don’t care what affiliation they have, they were elected to do a job, so they should freaking be there and do it.

  10. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, over 4 years ago

    Wraith, Your probably quite right, but if they were Repubs… Do I have to finish that thought for you?

  11. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 4 years ago

    Go to a neighboring state to permanently avoid going to war- okay. Going temporarily to essentially “filibuster” isn’t?

  12. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, over 4 years ago

    Churchill was right twice, and those two times make up for all the rest:

    In ‘33, Adolph was elected Chancellor of Germany in a free and fair election, but on a platform of rescinding the Treaty of Versailles, eliminating all Jews from Germany, and enslaving all the Slavic people. Under Westphalia, every British politician except Churchill said, ‘What happens in Germany stays in Germany.’ Churchill said, ‘Hitler has violated Versailles and threatened genocide. It is the responsibility of the UK to send in a peacekeeping force to enact a bloodless regime change.’ No one listened. But Churchill was right.

    In ‘40, everyone said, ‘Britain must surrender. Britain cannot hold out against Hitler. Britain is a chicken that will have its neck wrung.’

    Churchill said, ‘Some chicken. Some neck.’ And again, he was right.

    Churchill was wrong about a lot of things, but being right about those two more than makes up for all the others.

  13. DjGuardian

    DjGuardian said, over 4 years ago

    In terms of ‘filibustering,’ I have no issue with the process. However, following the process as it is intended is how it’s supposed to work. A filibuster does not consist of non-attendance. It’s usurping the floor so that the process can’t move forward but speaking as long as humanly possible.

    If the Dems or Reps want to filibuster, fine. Just show up. Until then, I think those who have purposely absconded from their jobs should be docked pay concurrent with the time they aren’t present.

    At least when people protest they generally show up. Is that so much to ask? Call the Reps a party of NO all you want, at least they showed up.

  14. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, over 4 years ago

    I see, while I was composing a reply to the Churchill debate, this thread turned in a most unusual direction: discussing the cartoon:

    ReasonsVentriloquist said,

    “The bill has a provision that essentially gives the states power generating stations to the governor to do with what he pleases”

    In Iraq, more than a trillion disappeared. There’s no proof where it went, but Prof Occam would say, ‘Why not to the people in charge, the people who actually controlled the money?’

    But states can’t declare war on foreign countries. So they have to take the money where they can find it. And the governor of Wisconsin seems to have found a few titbits to snatch for himself and his friends.

    Just good old Jacksonian democracy: to the winners go the spoils.

  15. DjGuardian

    DjGuardian said, over 4 years ago

    ^ LOL at your first line Michael

  16. Load the rest of the comments (10).