Comments (11) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   scottfreitas said, 2 months ago

   It’s true. The girl-government cheerleading squad known as the Mainstream Media gives itself away not just by how they report “news”, but by all the things they REFUSE to report…

2. 

   oldlegodad said, 2 months ago

   ABC (obamanetwork) reported it tonight. What will happen when Charlie is replaced by Diane?

3. 

   oldlegodad said, 2 months ago

   ABC (obamanetwork) reported it tonight. What will happen when Charlie is replaced by Diane?

4. 

   believecommonsense said, 2 months ago

   It’s been on CNN since the first video was out.

5. 

   senorbullwinkle said, 2 months ago

   Did anandy change his name to scott ?

6. 

   GNWachs said, 2 months ago

   The mother of all liberal MSM publications, the NYT, never once mentioned the Jones fiasco until in a small paragraph days after it was over. An editor was asked what happened? Our staff was on vacation. (that is the truth, check it out)

   ACORN was only mentioned after the 3rd office was exposed and after funding was stopped.

   And I get here time after time, what you say can’t be true it wasn’t in the MSM. And if you say you saw it in the WSJ, FOX, NYPost or heard it on the radio it is dismissed as right wing bias.

   If MSM won’t publish any news they don’t like or think hurts the great one just where do you expect the great unwashed to find out the truth? And that is the answer.

7. 

   5639 said, 2 months ago

   Obama was anointed by the same people that anointed Bush and Clinton: The Bilderberg group. The media won’t discuss them or WTC 7 or Vince Foster or the multiple bombs inside the Murrah Fed bldg in Oklahoma City or the evil that is the Federal Reserve, etc., etc., etc. The private off-shore bankers who own the Fed bought the largest and most prestigious newspapers in the USA in 1914 and installed editors to filter negative opinions of the Federal Reserve or any of their other corporate or political interests from the American public. It’s been that way ever since so why would we expect anything else? Thank bejebus for our uncontrolled Internet (so far) and for independent film makers with balls of steel.

8. 

   Ian Valenzuela said, 2 months ago

   What I learned from the media coverage of the Bush Administration is that you cannot blame a large organization for the actions of a Few Bad Apples. Granted, Acorn’s leaders knew nothing of the actions of their bad apples, in contrast to Rumsfeld Cheney and Bush, who gave orders to their bad apples, but still, Republicans taught us that the REMF’s are the ones to blame.

9. 

   senorbullwinkle said, 2 months ago

   FOX has this thing they do, they label Democrats Republicans if it’s something good and vice versa.

10. 

    David said, 2 months ago

    What’s the difference, folks?

    Journalism has long been dead. These outlets are the same in that they bow to the wishes of their powerful corporate bosses and report on what they say to and ask the questions that they are told to.

    They have all become weak-kneed from bowing to their own special interests.

11. 

    believecommonsense said, 2 months ago

    ABC reports on accusations against ACORN in Oct. 2008 but does not report the indictment of Republican National Committee official for fraudulent voter suppression activities.

    hmm, the right-wing World News does the same: reports on Acorn, not on RN C official indictment.

    If ABC is biased, they displayed the same bias of World News.

    http://mediamatters.org/research/200810150014

    and again CNN reported on ACORN from the moment the first tape was aired.