Gary Varvel by Gary Varvel

Gary Varvel

Comments (30) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Neil Mietz

    Neil Mietz GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    He is no Harry Truman.

  2. libsmasher

    libsmasher said, over 1 year ago

    The oblivious empty suit can only take credit for good things (most of which he doesn’t deserve anyway).

  3. Michyle Glen

    Michyle Glen said, over 1 year ago

    It worked for Both the Bushes.

  4. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 1 year ago

    President Obama why didn’t you know?

  5. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 1 year ago

    Fact 7 liberal groups over three hundred conservative.

  6. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    @mskemple

    There have been lots of shams over lots of years. Do not make the mistake of thinking that this is the first time.

    There is precedent for that. Remember the hearings regarding cooked “intel” that led to our two unwinnable wars in the middle east. Neither Mr. Bush nor Mr. Cheney would swear in, nor would Mr. Bush answer questions unless Mr. Cheney was present. Under those conditions, their testimony would have been allowed to be credibility-free, and would only have created more redacted pages to not be able to read.

  7. denis1112

    denis1112 said, over 1 year ago

    Obama doesn’t know,he never knows and he’s not going to find out because then he couldn’t blame Bush.

  8. grain of salt

    grain of salt said, over 1 year ago

    he should have used “i don’t recall” or “i don’t remember” like one of his most revered predecessors.

  9. DGF999

    DGF999 said, over 1 year ago

    @Neil Mietz

    “Buck? What buck?” – B. Obama

  10. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @I Play One On TV

    I agree. Bush and Cheney were reprehensible. That excuses Obama from being reprehensible how?

  11. echoraven

    echoraven said, over 1 year ago

    @jack75287

    You keep contradicting what the Kool Aid tells them…

  12. l84lnup

    l84lnup said, over 1 year ago

    you forgot the fact the delay in approval kept the conservatives from being able to raise money until after the election there by adding election fraud the the charges.

  13. CUNTHFUNYPAGS

    CUNTHFUNYPAGS said, over 1 year ago

    You forgot the earplugs and to add to the caption: “… and I DIDN’T DO” (cause it’s always someone else’s fault.)
    You must remember “He’s just a community organizer” and all his life he has just voted “PRESENT

    Q: You know how you can tell when Obama is lying?
    A: Every time he opens his mouth.
    Could it be the reason he uses a teleprompter – so he can “lie straight face while we cry…”

  14. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    @warjoski

    “I agree. Bush and Cheney were reprehensible. That excuses Obama from being reprehensible how?”

    Not in the slightest. Just saying that these outrages are part of a time-honored American tradition. I grow weary of the feigned shock.

  15. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    @Harleyquinn

    “So intel on our National security is “cooked” because why?”

    Time forbids me to answer in depth, but here’s the capsulized version.

    Intel on national security is “cooked” to convince people that the choices of the administration are correct. Just as we cherry-picked our “evidence” against Saddam Hussein, Mr. Obama did the same regarding the Syrians and the “rebels”, who are not citizens rebelling against a tyrannical government, but truly a bunch of profiteers and thugs from out of the country.

    But I think that what you’re really asking is “how do you know the intel is cooked”?

    Follow the money. Ahmed Chalabi was paid $35K per month to tell Bush/Cheney just what they wanted to hear. And don’t forget how much they believed a guy code-named “Curveball”.

    If you work back from the obvious goal to the “justification” of same, it’s easy to see. If you want to, that is.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (15).