Gary Varvel by Gary Varvel

Gary Varvel

Comments (35) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Neil Mietz

    Neil Mietz GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    He is no Harry Truman.

  2. libsmasher

    libsmasher said, about 1 year ago

    The oblivious empty suit can only take credit for good things (most of which he doesn’t deserve anyway).

  3. Michyle Glen

    Michyle Glen said, about 1 year ago

    It worked for Both the Bushes.

  4. Zipi

    Zipi said, about 1 year ago

    @TheTrustedMechanic

    The “Facts” in your little world are comforting aren’t they. It’s unfortunate that in the real world you are just plain wrong. Go back to your coolaid bath.

  5. mskemple

    mskemple said, about 1 year ago

    The lies and deceit go merrily on . I watched this morning as the House swore in HHS secretary Sebilious – You watch and tell me if that was an official swearing in of a witness or if it was an open door to allow her to further deceive everyone because technically she was not “sworn in”, not legally being sworn in would protect her from prosecution. Check it out , I think you’ll be amazed at how informally she was “sworn in”.

  6. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 1 year ago

    President Obama why didn’t you know?

  7. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 1 year ago

    @TheTrustedMechanic

    Fact 7 liberal groups over three hundred conservative.

  8. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 1 year ago

    @mskemple

    There have been lots of shams over lots of years. Do not make the mistake of thinking that this is the first time.

    There is precedent for that. Remember the hearings regarding cooked “intel” that led to our two unwinnable wars in the middle east. Neither Mr. Bush nor Mr. Cheney would swear in, nor would Mr. Bush answer questions unless Mr. Cheney was present. Under those conditions, their testimony would have been allowed to be credibility-free, and would only have created more redacted pages to not be able to read.

  9. denis1112

    denis1112 said, about 1 year ago

    Obama doesn’t know,he never knows and he’s not going to find out because then he couldn’t blame Bush.

  10. grain of salt

    grain of salt said, about 1 year ago

    he should have used “i don’t recall” or “i don’t remember” like one of his most revered predecessors.

  11. DGF999

    DGF999 said, about 1 year ago

    @Neil Mietz

    “Buck? What buck?” – B. Obama

  12. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @I Play One On TV

    I agree. Bush and Cheney were reprehensible. That excuses Obama from being reprehensible how?

  13. echoraven

    echoraven said, about 1 year ago

    @jack75287

    You keep contradicting what the Kool Aid tells them…

  14. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic said, about 4 hours ago
    FACT Liberal groups were targeted by the IRS also. "
    Spit out the bit already! Obama’s lame Stream preaches and you follow.
    Do you ask “What books do you read” before you change the oil?

  15. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @I Play One On TV

    There is precedent for that. Remember the hearings regarding cooked “intel” ..
    So intel on our National security is “cooked” because why? retrospeck you do not agree with it? that most of it will be classified?
    No wonder you like Obama. his administration is the worse in history for “leaks” true or not. Leaks that have gotten Americans killed! His “transparency” Only applies to our National secrets and the scandals he pretends are not there.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (20).