Gary Varvel by Gary Varvel

Gary Varvel

Recommended

Comments (18) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. DGF999

    DGF999 said, about 1 year ago

    Could be a lib on the right. I would think that it’s a Conservative though, considering the libs would never translate what they are saying so that the low-informed voters would know what they’re actually saying…

  2. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, about 1 year ago

    As a liberal, I will explain this cartoon to you. The Democrat is the one on the left. The conservative commentator is translating on the right. These are iconic locations.
    But although the humor is based on a classic right-wing view of what Democrats espouse, I guess the joke isn’t all that obvious after all.

  3. Zipi

    Zipi said, about 1 year ago

    @DGF999

    The only “information” the “low-informed voters” (better known as Gimmies) want is to know how much their welfare check will be increased and if they are going to get an “Obamascreen” TV (you know, to help them find a job, like the Obamaphone is supposed to be used for) soon.

  4. mikefive

    mikefive said, about 1 year ago

    Is there any politician out there that doesn’t need a translator? The media, of course, does their own translation that may or may not reflect what the politician meant. Then, when politicians do get caught in an idiot statement, they re-translate (spin?) what they said to make it more palatable to the public. It’s no wonder that it’s so difficult to find good information.

  5. Nos Nevets

    Nos Nevets said, about 1 year ago

    Just Sequester.
    Now. Please! It’s a slight reduction in rate of increase.
    If it hurts me, personally, fine.

  6. PlainBill

    PlainBill said, about 1 year ago

    @ossiningaling

    That can’t be it. Conservatives don’t have principles.

  7. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, about 1 year ago

    Varvel has done it again—-nailed the Left versus Right issues in D.C.
    -
    many speechmakers are provided with a Signer for the deaf; this is an excellent idea to provide an Interpreter for Poly-Speech which is the MO for pols pulling the wool over the eyes of voters outside the Beltway. (Voters inside are goners already, IMO)
    -
    Varvel is correct….Obama’s “balanced approach” means “tax hikes and new taxes” and his version is far, far from true balance. “Investments” is code for “federal OVER-spending”.
    Democrats always demand the GOP “compromise” which does mean abandoning principles long held by that party=
    a smaller federal government, the lowest possible tax rates, and obedience to rules: an annual budget, on time. This rule is Law that Democrats think they are “above”….being the long-time scoff-law political party that they are historically.

  8. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, about 1 year ago

    @DGF999

    Don’t need a translation when it is given to you directly and clearly. Austerity destroys when it is a Depression and the D’s and R’s are for Austerity. That leads to violence in the streets and open Fascism.

  9. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, about 1 year ago

    @Nos Nevets

    Will it take food away from you? This Sequester will. Education for the poor? It will do that too, take it away. Just because it may or may not hurt you it shouldn’t be allowed.

  10. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, about 1 year ago

    @ScottPM

    Some of us understand that cutting the deficit is a Republican Conservative idea that president Obama and his Democrat Conservatives want the same thing. End to the New Deal and Great Society.

  11. outside looking in

    outside looking in said, about 1 year ago

    insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a diffrent results [ ex electing the same bunch to congress ] TERM LIMITS PLEASE notice congress didnt sequester thier budget

  12. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, about 1 year ago

    @ossiningaling

    “As a liberal, I will explain this cartoon to you. The Democrat is the one on the left. The conservative commentator is translating on the right. These are iconic locations. "

    Except that as the toon is viewed from the characters’ perspective, you’re wrong again. The lib who only wants more taxes and spending is the nut case, as usual.

  13. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, about 1 year ago

    “Only a Redneck could look at a balanced approach and call it unbalanced, or see a compromise as an abandonment of principle. (And up is down and black is white and good is evil….)”

    You’re always so insightful, Nookie. Pelosi was in a compromising mood when she said, “Vote for the bill, and then read it.” Obama is full of compromise when he says he’ll reject any plan that doesn’t include tax increases and more spending.

    I agree with you, however, about principles. Dems’ principles are to keep making things worse, and blame their predecessors, and they have remained true to those principles.

  14. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, about 1 year ago

    @Night-Gaunt49

    “Will it take food away from you? This Sequester will. Education for the poor? It will do that too, take it away. Just because it may or may not hurt you it shouldn’t be allowed.”

    Give it a rest. Most of the cuts won’t happen for several months, if ever. We’re still spending more money than last year. The cuts amount to about 1%.

    The libs expect everyone to make do with less except themselves. Liars and hypocrites.

  15. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Why do Republicans say a 3% increase in maximum tax rate on the highest incomes (usually NOT “earned” income, but dividends they don’t “work” for) is a disaster, while a 3% cut from sequestration, which for many agencies is actually 17%, is no problem??

  16. Load the rest of the comments (3).