Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Ms. Ima said, 3 months ago

   Nothing angelic about that dung-dweller.
2. 

   SeaFox10 said, 3 months ago

   I don’t understand why we don’t show that country what a real nuke looks like! Up close! And about 50 times!
3. 

   Jase99 said, 3 months ago

   @SeaFox10

   “I don’t understand why we don’t show that country what a real nuke looks like! Up close! And about 50 times!”
   
   Um….. because the vast majority of the casualties would be innocent civilians who are already suffering, the few allies we have left would probably start seeing us as nonredeemable monsters, and it would further encourage our growing list of enemies to create/obtain nukes to use against us????
4. 

   The Wolf In Your Midst said, 3 months ago

   @SeaFox10

   Oh, I’m sure that China, South Korea and all the other surrounding countries would really appreciate the nuclear fallout. Or do you believe that radiation stops at national borders?
5. 

   Ionizer said, 3 months ago

   @SeaFox10

   I don’t think NK should have nukes, but you’re just nutso.
6. 

   omQ R said, 3 months ago

   @SeaFox10

   SeaFox10 said, about 2 hours ago: “I don’t understand why we don’t show that country what a real nuke looks like! Up close! And about 50 times!”

   SeaFox10 commented on Skin Horse about 2 hours ago: “Al-obama is the expert on loud nonsense!”
7. 

   Tigger said, 3 months ago

   @SeaFox10

   Because it would end life on earth for all of us as once one Nuke was released all other nukes would be released which would implode Planet Earth into radioactive dust particles to float in space forevermore.
8. 

   I Play One On TV said, 3 months ago

   There’s a reason why “Mutually Assured Destruction” carries the acronym it does.
9. 

   D PB said, 3 months ago

   @SeaFox10

   Seriously? Your suggestion would seem to suggest you have no idea what happens in the aftermath of a nuclear weapon detonation.
   
   Now, if you were suggesting this as an example of hyperbole, that would be different. There are other more appropriate things that could be done, from a purely weapons use standpoint, to get the message across. Precision strike against their missile launch sight, precision strike against their nuclear production facilities are a couple examples.
   
   But you need to take into consideration they are an ally of China, and as such China may very well come to their defense.
   
   I see N Korea as one of the school yard bullies, low on self esteem and good a bloviating.
   
   Treat them with caution but keep them at arms distance.
10. 

    Gypsy8 said, 3 months ago

    A precision non-nuclear strike might be necessary. And China would probably applaud, even as they denounce. This is one country you do not want to have the bomb, not just because they might be crazy enough to use it, but because they might not have the technology to prevent accidents that could poison the area.
11. 

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 3 months ago

    @SeaFox10

    You are insane. So nuke them and then what? China just might hit us, Japan will want to hit us with nukes as they get the fall out.
12. 

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 3 months ago

    China did not give nukes to N. Korea, they got it from the helpful Pakistanis and maybe even Israel. it is like having a bomb tied to your ass waiting to go off. Not a pleasant situation for the Chinese either. But they don’t dare invade.
13. 

    Ionizer said, 3 months ago

    @Tigger

    “Because it would end life on earth for all of us as once one Nuke was released all other nukes would be released which would implode Planet Earth into radioactive dust particles to float in space forevermore.”
    
    Actually, someone did the calculations several years ago, and there isn’t enough fissile material in all of the world’s armaments to physically destroy the earth, by a huge factor. Kill all life, probably, but the earth will roll merrily along, pretty much as it is.
    
    There’s an interesting calculator for collisions at http://www.purdue.edu/impactearth/. Even a collision with the moon would make little change in Earth’s mass. You wouldn’t want to be here, however.
14. 

    Radish said, 3 months ago

    He love you long time.
15. 

    swr said, 3 months ago

    @SeaFox10

    War is alway to be avoided, until or unless the other options are worse.
16. Load the rest of the comments (8).