Gary Varvel by Gary Varvel

Gary Varvel

Comments (21) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. avarner

    avarner said, over 2 years ago

    Take it all.

    It won’t make a dent in the mess we have now.

    Thankfully, it’s Bush’s fault…

  2. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, over 2 years ago

    If this generation of rich can’t survive a petty tax cut, they lose the right to be called rich anyway and someone more resourceful will quickly fill that void.

  3. Hamstersbane

    Hamstersbane said, over 2 years ago

    It’s not that they can’t survive. They will. It’s the steps they take as businessmen to survive. If costs increase on a business, expenses have to be cut. The biggest expense for just about any company is payroll.

  4. Michyle Glen

    Michyle Glen said, over 2 years ago

    Lets fill in the loopholes, tax cuts, corp entitlements, and see how fast the rich wish they only had to deal with
    the raised tax’s?

  5. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 2 years ago

    Let’s see. The top 1% has ten times the wealth it had thirty years ago, while the bottom 50% is poorer. Let’s make sure that the budget is balanced ENTIRELY by cutting programs for the poor, and let’s give more money to the top. Ever wonder why you’re losing the argument? By the way, Obama doesn’t hate the rich (he’s one of them, his books sell well). He just doesn’t see why they should be the ONLY demographic who are off-limits.

  6. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, over 2 years ago

    Obama lives high on the Taxpayers’ Expense….a news item quoted by Rush this week said that the UK taxpayers pay for Her Royal Highness living expenses at $58 million a year.
    But US taxpayers foot the bills at $1.4 Billion a year for Obama.
    Emperor Obama. Everybody else making over $250,000 annually is “rich” and must be taxed to the Nth Degree according to Scrooge Obama…..who leads the enthusiastic democratic smear of “it’s all Bush’s fault”…..
    (IMO it is the voters who drink the Jim Jones Koolaid and vote for Obama the Marxist)

  7. wbr

    wbr said, over 2 years ago

    french raised taxes on rich — the rich noved to belgian and uk next ca raised tax on rich and nevada gets refugees soros does not care he has a treaty to protect him

  8. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, over 2 years ago

    @avarner

    Actually it started under Reagan and continued through every president of both parties. Return it to 70% we will all do better including the various levels of rich.

  9. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, over 2 years ago

    @Tigger

    The Democrats had control of the Congress for two months only.

  10. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, over 2 years ago

    @Tigger

    If you are worth billions it wouldn’t stop you from living well. But who is demanding 95%, I just demand at least 70%-91%.

  11. skibum70

    skibum70 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @Ms. Ima

    and you will defecate in perptuity

    1

  12. skibum70

    skibum70 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @HOWGOZIT

    No Zit! You are dissgusting

  13. skibum70

    skibum70 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @disgustedtaxpayer

    wat4 sit and die!

  14. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    The rich can afford to pay an equitable share.

  15. Stipple

    Stipple said, over 2 years ago

    @HOWGOZIT

    I hope you understand the pain this causes me.
    You are correct, the rich did not get there stealing from the poor.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (6).