Gary Varvel by Gary Varvel

Gary Varvel

Recommended

Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. SpicyNacho

    SpicyNacho said, about 3 years ago

    Now that is funnnnnny! Sotus nominee and softball extroidinaire.

  2. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 3 years ago

    News Flash!! In Unprecedented Move, President Picks Supreme Court Nominee Who Supports His Positions!!

  3. 4uk4ata

    4uk4ata said, about 3 years ago

    “How far left from left must he go”

    Who, the guy who cut taxes, accepted a healthcare “reform” that was to the right of most pols on the left wanted, and ok’d offshore drilling?

    If that’s your reaction to Obama now, I wonder what it would be if he actually were a die-hard leftwinger.

  4. Norman L Jones Sr

    Norman L Jones Sr said, about 3 years ago

    Both Have NO experience. With any luck Bozo won’t even be a one term pres with all the laws he has broken. IMPEACH HIM before he completely destroys our country.

  5. zekedog55

    zekedog55 said, about 3 years ago

    ^ And to think your name is so very close to normal…

    “…all the laws he has broken.” I’d say it is time to oil your hinges, Norman old chap, except for the fact you’ve become unhinged.

    Funny cartoon, though, Varvel. Got a chuckle from moi.

  6. S King

    S King said, about 3 years ago

    Yeah, appointed or elected with no experience…I get it.

    It’s not very funny, though. Varvel…please try again.

    ‘Nuff said.

  7. dtroutma

    dtroutma said, about 3 years ago

    Just morphed Cheney (tall) and Bush (mini).

  8. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    4uk4ata, I get the feeling that you think ANandy uses facts for his mindless Obama-bashing.

    Nope.

  9. W(ar).Crime

    W(ar).Crime said, about 3 years ago

    @Nimrod Where were you when the Bushmiser was leading the country straight to hell?

  10. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    Is that a “fact”, Howie?

  11. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, about 3 years ago

    I don’t see daily mindless “Bozotus” postings as involving much in the way of facts.

    Or thought.

    4uk4ata pointed that out nicely in this thread.

  12. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 3 years ago

    It’s not totally clear that there are a lot of unambiguous “facts” out there in the world. Most “facts” involve a certain amount of interpretation. Sometimes it’s simplistic to demand the facts, just the facts.

    But I find that when I post statistics and tables and such, my posts are regularly ignored. For instance, I posted a table of the ratio of Debt to GDP in a number of countries a few days ago, in response to claims that the US was getting into the same trouble Greece is in, and it was almost completely ignored. So I wonder how much people are interested in “facts” that challenge their opinions. (I’m not just blaming the right, by the way.)

  13. 4uk4ata

    4uk4ata said, about 3 years ago

    “With any luck Bozo won’t even be a one term pres with all the laws he has broken. IMPEACH HIM before he completely destroys our country.”

    Right, dream on about all those broken laws, Norman. I kinda think the GOP would have gone for that if they had a snowball’s chance in hell of passing it.

    Has anyone watched that movie “Slap her - she’s French?” I think there may be an adaptation “Impeach him - he’s Democrat”. Paid for, inspired by and heavily supported by the political comedy department of the GOP, of course ;)

  14. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, about 3 years ago

    Varvel has this cartoon 100% correct.

    Kagan and Obama have the same type of parents…FAR LEFT….and the same type of education….LEFTIST…and the same evidence of writings and verbal expressions and “company they choose” to show that both think in the Marxist-Socialist mindset.

    Not the best type of persons for either the Oval Office or the USSC….if we are to keep our Founding Form of government…..which is anti-socialism/marxism.

  15. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 3 years ago

    Is it possible to be anti something that doesn’t exist yet? If so, I’m anti-dapticalism, whatever that turns out to be.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (1).