Free Range by Bill Whitehead

Free Range

Comments (14) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, over 3 years ago

    Another scam artist feeding on the gullible.

  2. Fuzzy Thinker (I)

    Fuzzy Thinker (I) GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    I know a few scientists that would become famous if they could reproduce the missing links in the lab.

  3. Mark

    Mark said, over 3 years ago

    @Fuzzy Thinker (I)

    I really doubt you know any scientists…

  4. rnmontgomery

    rnmontgomery said, over 3 years ago

    Finally, truth in advertising, evolution is not a random event. . . there is a plan

  5. Digital Frog

    Digital Frog GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago


    or the gill-able?

  6. lamaco

    lamaco said, over 3 years ago

    Why is is either/or? I believe that evolution is real, and I believe that it was clever of God to have thought of it.

  7. Fuzzy Thinker (I)

    Fuzzy Thinker (I) GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago


    Hi Mark… or, should I say ‘low mark’… There are some TROLLS out there that could take lessons from you. Someone should explain to you that you have just received the opposite of a compliment.

  8. Fuzzy Thinker (I)

    Fuzzy Thinker (I) GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Quote from an Evolutionist: “…But we must conclude that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any Bio-Chemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations”. Professor Harold, University of Colorado, page 205 of his book.

  9. Fuzzy Thinker (I)

    Fuzzy Thinker (I) GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Probability Theory indicates that the chance of Life beginning with the complexity of the building blocks required would need about 10 Billion years of life-supporting time. That disagrees with current knowledge of Earth History. To me, the Law of Natural Selection is insufficient as the SOLE force for change in the Evolutionary Hypothesis. Intelligent Design would account for the rapid population of significantly diverse species.
    Scientists do not understand the complexities involved- they cannot even produce a 4-legged chicken for all the kids at the dinner table.

  10. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, over 3 years ago

    You have failed to take into account the Fall. We rejected our Creator and told him we could run things better ourselves. The mess we see around us is the result.

  11. chireef

    chireef GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago


    well spoken, if I was god evolution is the way i would have done it to, because i am a lazy god and do things the easiest way possible.

  12. aircraft-engineer

    aircraft-engineer said, over 3 years ago

    just have to LOVE religious IDIOCY…and those who thump it, too4
    IF evolution isn’t what the theory says it should be, then WHY does the fossil record show what it does. And just THINK – since according to “creation BS” everything came into being over a 1 week time period (I won’t go into the cosmic time scale) what about the changes shown in the fossil record? Millions of years as shown in the record based on GEOLOGICAL processes…but just think – if H,O.M.o Sapirns eveolved, then that very evolution rendeers the very basis of particularly the abrahamic religions as not on;y “flawed” but absolutely INERROR.

  13. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, over 3 years ago


    Personally I find it tragic, especially the zealots of the atheistic religion who do not even seem to recognize what they are doing. All false religions, including atheism, are tragic. According to evolution and the BB, something magically appeared out of nothing, ludicrous in itself, then there was hydrogen, a colorless, odorless gas that, given time, becomes people. Of course, you need more than just hydrogen. Somehow this gas managed to produce all the incredible complex, specified information we find around us…never mind the fact that only a mind can produce such, evolutionists love the overlook that little aspect. Then of course there is the atheist that wants there to be morality, but has no basis for objective morality within their own worldview. And of course free will cannot exist, either, since we are purely material beings and are there simply slaves to the laws of chemistry since all “choices” we make are reduced to chemical reactions in our brains going off in a certain way in response to a stimulus. And the atheist loves to attempt to use logic and reason to try and make their case, yet this is immaterial and therefore disallowed within that worldview. Not to mention the fact that the atheist has no real reason to be able trust his own randomly derived brain and senses. Then there is the (other) self-refuting aspect that the atheist claims to be right and the Christian wrong, yet within his own worldview both brains are randomly derived and obey the same laws of chemistry, so why should the atheist brain be believed over the Christian? Oh yeah, atheism and its pseudo-science branches of evolution and the BB (which would only produce an expanding cloud of gas even if we allow it to happen and overlook the very large problem of where what went “bang” came from in the first place) are real winners.

  14. parkerfields

    parkerfields GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    If they could do it back then, why can’t they do it anymore?

  15. Refresh Comments.