Comments (9) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   margueritem said, 3 months ago

   Why not, everyone else does…
2. 

   ronald rini said, 3 months ago

   The question after or during the election why are there no slanders suits
3. 

   rnmontgomery said, 3 months ago

   A king gets elected???
4. 

   hippogriff said, 3 months ago

   ronald rini: New York Times “won” a libel suit. The court said that unless you could actually produce a memo saying to libel, anyone “seeking public notoriety” by running for office had no recourse at law. “Public notoriety” has since been expanded to include merely writing a letter to the editor and having it published. My journalism “ethics” class emphasized when libeling someone, be sure and find this kind of “evidence”, then you can say anything without fear of punishment.
5. 

   sandflea said, 3 months ago

   @rnmontgomery

   By a landslide.
6. 

   Night-Gaunt49 said, 3 months ago

   That is why you need a negative vote. So that the unopposed loses then it open it up to more choices.
7. 

   ujean said, 3 months ago

   A good theme for his negative ads “The peasants are revolting!” It worked for King Fink I in another strip.
8. 

   MPeters said, 3 months ago

   Who’s he going to smear if he doesn’t have any competition?
9. 

   Ather said, 3 months ago

   What a fink
10. Refresh Comments.