Frank & Ernest by Thaves

Frank & Ernest

Comments (26) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. sonny1

    sonny1 said, about 4 years ago

    Why not ? Obamacare should have been a zero but they let it stand.

  2. Nabuquduriuzhur

    Nabuquduriuzhur said, about 4 years ago

    The court has a long history of breaking the law. One of the scarier ones for private property was Babbit vs. Sweethome.

  3. BigChiefDesoto

    BigChiefDesoto said, about 4 years ago

    We REALLY should dust off the impeachment process! The founders put it in the Constitution so it could be USED, not “off the table” to use Pelosi’s words!

    For example count the words concerning the President! There are more words in the Constitution describing how to select and get rid of the President than there are saying what his duties as President are!!!

  4. win

    win said, about 4 years ago

    they use a Scalia, tho

  5. AshburnStadium

    AshburnStadium said, about 4 years ago


    Obamacare was a 10. Read the Preamble: “…promote the general welfare…”
    Keeping the nation healthy promotes the nation’s general welfare.

  6. fhhuber

    fhhuber said, about 4 years ago

    You don’t promote the general welfare by running the country into bankruptcy…. which will be the result of Obumma care

  7. Kylie2112

    Kylie2112 said, about 4 years ago


    Saves money on Medicare/Medicaid. Also, the more people on the rolls of an insurance company, the cheaper the rates go (provided insurance companies start to play fair).

  8. cjl-3

    cjl-3 said, about 4 years ago

    The scale for the Supreme court is one to nine, not ten.

  9. bbadenov

    bbadenov said, about 4 years ago


    I think the key is “welfare”. Provide a large voting block something at someone else’s expense and assure that they will vote for you next time around. Obama in a nutshell.

  10. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury said, about 4 years ago


    Only if it works the way that its backers say that it will. And I for one do not have any confidence whatsoever in the U.S. government’s ability to do so.

  11. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury said, about 4 years ago

    I’ve got a news bulletin for you: the mess we are in is just as much the fault of the Democrats as it is the Republicans. Or perhaps you’ve forgotten just who exactly decided that people who could not afford to buy a house still had the “right” to do so, and used every trick in the book to make certain that happened. Carter signed the legislation into law, while Clinton started enforcing it, while Frank and Dodd flatly refused to allow any oversight on either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and insisted that nothing bad was going to happen. So don’t give me that “Bush did this” garbage. And Obama has not done any better than Bush did, for that matter.

  12. FishDog93

    FishDog93 said, about 4 years ago

    Seems the Chief Justice used this idea to decide Obamacare. Hopefully under a new President he will be impeached.

  13. galanti

    galanti said, about 4 years ago

    H.L. Mencken was right. I’m surprised at the number of people who think putting a Pagan in the White House will solve the country’s problems?

  14. FrankenAaronStein

    FrankenAaronStein said, about 4 years ago


    I’ll vote for YOU in November. Let’s see you put your money where your mouth is.


    Nit wits.

  15. Chris Maple

    Chris Maple said, about 4 years ago


    It has been established repeatedly, ad nauseam, first by the Constitution’s author (James Madison), that the phrase “general welfare” is not an excuse to allow any thing to be constitutional. Furthermore, Obamacare will not

    keep the nation healthy, but will lead to a catastrophic decline in health as doctors (now slaves) leave the profession.

    It is more than just ignorant to claim that the phrase “general welfare” is anything other than a statement of principle, it is dishonest and evil.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (11).