Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Paul Smith said, 5 months ago

   A subsidiary of PETA.
2. 

   simpsonfan2 said, 5 months ago

   Alan Abel is busy again.
3. 

   Nabuquduriuzhur said, 5 months ago

   Watch out, soon there will be “Textiles for Tigers”…
4. 

   Alexikakos said, 5 months ago

   I think Carrillo may be trying to riff off “Sermon on the Mount.” (Strictly an observation, by the way.)
5. 

   dukedoug said, 5 months ago

   Yarn bomb !!
6. 

   mkahn said, 5 months ago

   MAN is in the forest.
7. 

   bgby4884 said, 5 months ago

   That’s about how silly some of those tree huggers look too!
8. 

   Oxnate said, 5 months ago

   On the plus side, the sweater will make it easier for the real hunters to see and kill him.
9. 

   ewalnut said, 5 months ago

   People are interpreting this as a pro-wildlife thing, but isn’t it an anti-nudity thing?
10. 

    phritzg said, 5 months ago

    If trying to preserve the existence of trees that have grown for hundreds of years to heights of over 300 feet, trunk diameters of over 30 feet, and circumferences of over 100 feet at their base is the definition of a tree hugger, then I am one.
11. 

    Cornelius said, 5 months ago

    @phritzg

    Wow, i just thought of something, phritzg… How come there aren’t any million-year-old trees?
12. 

    knottytippet said, 5 months ago

    It’s a comic — this is FUNNY!
13. 

    PoodleGroomer said, 5 months ago

    Clothing makes wild animals dependent on humans. They can’t work the buttons and zippers when they need to relieve themselves.
14. 

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 5 months ago

    @ewalnut

    Take your pick on the meaning. I think it is a rift on those who want to mother wild life. To an exaggerated degree in the wrong way.
15. 

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 5 months ago

    @Cornelius

    There is one I think or maybe it is thousands of years old. A twisted pine tree.
16. Load the rest of the comments (1).