Drew Sheneman by Drew Sheneman

Drew Sheneman

Recommended

Comments (18) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    because it is real easy to run a stop sign illegally and kill someone and possibly yourself. No need to warn a person that hey, you need to stop here and look. Just like the NRA does not have to hold gun safety courses, that would be more apple to apple comparison. But that would not be to the loony liberal Obama white house, hype and blame talking point. So why not just go with with the scare tactics. All that is missing is a poor kid in the crosswalk like a person behind the wheel just wants to run over as many kids as possible. So the lib can cry and cry it for the kids.

    really?

  2. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    So, does Drew want to ban Pressure Cookers?
    Does Drew want to ban the Use of all search engines?
    Does Drew want to ban all the ingredients found in the Boston Pressure Cooker Bombs?

  3. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, 12 months ago

    This did not originate with Mr. Sheneman. If you have been reading the posts the past few weeks, you’ll see a pattern. A number of posters have mentioned that there should be no more laws, no more background checks, no more anything, because criminals break the law. Actually, many of them went as far as to call some of us ugly names because we were too stupid to understand that criminals would not undergo background checks, criminals would not buy arms legally, and on and on.

    Even Mr. LaPierre had a now-famous discussion with John Oliver on the Daily Show, where Mr. Oliver made the same point, except substituting the word “drugs” for “guns”, and got Mr. LaPierre to almost agree to the idea that there is no reason for drug laws because drug users don’t obey them.

    The argument can be used for anything, including stop signs. Of course, it’s silly to use it for stop signs, drunk driving, no-trespassing signs, or anything else. But evidently it’s not silly when it comes to guns.

    Some conclusions are just bankrupt, and that’s one of them. Tigger, I’m glad you got the point. Ain’t satire great when it fits just right?

  4. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    Women don’t obey abortion laws, so we don’t need any.

  5. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    Drew has merely drawn, EXACTLY the argument the NRA and “gun nuts” have clung to. “Laws don’t work or stop criminals”. Right. Eliminate all laws, Congress, state legislators, police, fire departments, EMT’s and all those other folks on the “government dole” bleeding all those hard working folks at Mickey D’s dry! (Of course, don’t tax corporations or the super wealthy at the same rate (actually paid) because that would be “evil” and “socialist”!

  6. victoria2

    victoria2 said, 12 months ago

    Are stop signs protected by our constitution? You are comparing apples and guns. Illogical.

  7. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C and Martens Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C and Martens Release said, 12 months ago

    The right wing motto so they don’t have to do background checks on guns. And then when the next shooting happens blame people with no guns rather than how that crazy person got a hold of one in the first place.

  8. jmattadams

    jmattadams GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    No, an apt comparison would be if a lib was standing there saying, “criminals don’t obey red lights, so we need to put up a stop sign to make the law abiding stop even when the light is green.” Criminals will still ignore both and the libs did nothing but create a massive traffic jam at the intersection.

  9. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    @victoria2

    “Are stop signs protected by our constitution?”

    Victoria must also believe there shouldn’t be a law prohibiting the false call of “Fire!” in a crowded building because free speech is protected by our Constitution.

    By the way, Victoria…that Constitutional protection you mentioned: Does it say anything about “well regulated”?

  10. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    @jmattadams

    That made no sense at all, since there is currently no background checks for gun shows and private sales. Besides, for your attempted analogy to be valid, an NRA-equivalent would block enforcement of both the red light and the stop sign.

  11. parkerfields

    parkerfields GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    If you use liberal distorted logic to prove a point, and gun control seemed reasonable because criminals use guns, how about – background checks for auto purchases, since criminals use autos to get away, and even to kill people in their way – background checks for beer and alcohol purchases, since criminals have often been using these substances prior to committing their crimes – and, since there are so many politicians that have been guilty of crimes, maybe we should do away with the government, and eliminate all of those criminals’ high paying jobs.

  12. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    @parkerfields

    You know, parkerfields, it’s a shame that the main purpose of motor vehicles and guns is completely different. Otherwise your attempted analogy might have made a bit of sense.

    Let’s look at murders and assaults: Were they more likely to be committed with cars, or guns? And why?

  13. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    @I Play One On TV

    Please tell all of us how a young Teenage Girl was killed in Chicago one mile from President Obama’s home shortly after she returned home from her performance at President Obama’s 2nd Inaugural when Chicago has very Strict Gun Laws? This is 1000% proof Strict Gun Laws do nothing to halt Gun Violence and people killed by guns.

  14. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    @dtroutma

    Go to www.irs.gov/2012 Tax Table, and you will see how much the Rich Pay in IRS Taxes. The Super Wealthy do indeed pay their fair share in IRS Taxes.

    Why are you not angry that Obama paid only 17% in IRS Taxes for 2012?

    Why are you giving Obama a pass on not paying his fair share in IRS Taxes?

    Why do you want to take away the Tax Breaks Obama used from the Rich of his ilk?

  15. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, 12 months ago

    @Anthony 2816

    What about ‘Shall not be infringed’?

    You’re also cherry picking the 2nd Amendment

  16. Load the rest of the comments (3).