Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   pirate227 said, 10 months ago

   Nothing left to say here except ZING!
2. 

   onguard said, 10 months ago

   Disenfranchised voter = a person or whatever, dead or alive, not legally eligible to vote who is not allow to use devious and illegal process created by Democrats for the specific purpose of allowing that vote to count……The Process Model is located in Chicago. The Mission statement resides in the DNC. The chief Operative is the Attorney General. Watering down the Vote of legal citizens is the Goal.
3. 

   dtroutma said, 10 months ago

   Sheneman gets it right again.
4. 

   Atma said, 10 months ago

   @onguard

   You are deflecting the bald faced fact about the actual situation—there is no meaningful voter fraud in the vast majority of districts that could anywhere near upset elections. This “voter fraud prevention” is sheer political maneuvering to make it difficult for the poor and elderly to legally vote. The ’toon is spot on. To deny it is delusional.
5. 

   Murphy224 said, 10 months ago

   Comics
   Wow, this has to be the dumbest made-up issue ever.  People still have  over 3 months to get an ID before the election.  If they can’t figure it out they shouldn’t be voting.  Also if Dems are really worried about people getting to the DMV  or having 10 dollars to get the ID, why don’t Dems just pay for them and give them a ride?

   Unless there’s some OTHER reason Dems don’t want people to show ID when they vote????
6. 

   NeoconMan said, 10 months ago

   And I really don’t see why minorities should have the RIGHT to vote. It’s not like they’re real Americans or anything.
7. 

   Murphy224 said, 10 months ago

   @NeoconMan

   Who said anything about minorities? I must have missed the No Minorities Allowed sign at the DMV.
8. 

   Chillbilly said, 10 months ago

   Let’s just say that this isn’t about disenfranchinsing minorities over and over until it’s finally true.
9. 

   cjr53 said, 10 months ago

   @Murphy224

   Voter registration should include a ‘No Charge’ to the registrant Photo ID in order to eliminate the minority disenfranchisement. But of course, with a non-existent problem, and a draconian solution, why would any r/w-tea partier think minorities, elderly on fixed incomes or any other person without financial resources are affected?
10. 

    ARodney said, 10 months ago

    No charge for the ID — but you DO need to pay for the birth certificate to GET the ID. The conservative lie is made clear by the numbers, and by their own admission that they are happy to remove 750,000 poor, elderly, and minority Pennsylvanian citizens from the voter rolls to block zero cases of voter fraud because it will allow Romney to win Pennsylvania.
11. 

    NeoconMan said, 10 months ago

    @Murphy224

    Murphy224 said, “I must have missed the No Minorities Allowed sign at the DMV.”

    
    Yeah, I’m with you. I miss seeing those signs too.
12. 

    Gresch said, 10 months ago

    How about a biometric like fingerprints.
13. 

    Murphy224 said, 10 months ago

    @Gresch

    Of course fingerprints would be fine, but the Dems would find some reason why they don’t want that either. My guess would be that it discriminates against people without fingers. It’s funny how everybody just assumes it only Democrats that can’t figure out how to get an ID. Then again they’re probably right.
14. 

    NeoconMan said, 10 months ago

    @HOWGOZIT

    ^ Agreed,That’s what happens when we allow them into society.

    
    Should NEVER have given them the vote. Women either.
15. 

    STLDan said, 10 months ago

    @onguard

    I guess you just ignore that the Bush administatin investigated voter fraud and found 86 cases out of 3 million. You are an idiot.
16. Load the rest of the comments (2).