Comments (8) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   cfortunato said, about 1 year ago

   Thank you, Mr. Trudeau.

2. 

   iamnoman said, about 1 year ago

   Whaddya bet someone at APA approved that list, wink wink nudge nudge?

3. 

   longtimecomicsfan said, about 1 year ago

   It’s still warm because of the toxicity

4. 

   pschearer said, about 1 year ago

   Wow, America’s so lucky no leftist ever slimed a conservative.

5. 

   Eugeno said, about 1 year ago

   Yes - especially since there was/is such a preponderance of conservative example to draw upon. Yet ad hominem is still an invalid rhetorical tactic - too bad hardly anyone has had the opportunity to study it any more, since forensic speech has largely gone away in the schools, mostly because of conservative budget cuts.

6. 

   runar said, about 1 year ago

   You can see parts of it yourselves at http://web.utk.edu/~glenn/GopacMemo.html and http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1276

7. 

   Margueritem said, about 1 year ago

   runar, where did you find that? Is it serious, or a joke? If it’s not a joke whoever wrote it is right on the money.

8. 

   tobybartels said, about 1 year ago

   Grokenstein, you've said that before, but you've never answered my question: who said that?

   Nobody that I know stumped for Nader in 2000 but is stumping for Obama today. (To vote is one thing, of course, but to actively campaign is another.) So who are these progressive flip-floppers???

   Edit: I've read elsewhere that Michael Moore stumped for Nader in 2000 but is stumping for Obama in 2008. But he'd already flipped in 2004 to stump for Kerry, so he doesn't fit Grok's pattern.

   Surely there must be somebody who does, but I don't think that it's common!