Donna Barstow by Donna Barstow
- August 31, 2009
- From Beginning
- Previous feature
- Show Calendar
- Next feature
- Current
Tags: Glenn Beck, radio, racist, advertising. Add Tags
Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a Comic Genius account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this or any other comic strip daily emailed daily. Comics and Editorial Cartoons are updated everyday so there is always something new.
With a free account you will receive one comic from your Personalized Comic Page daily. Upgrade to a Comic Genius account (Only $.99/Month) and get all of your comics emailed daily plus receive unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Tags: Glenn Beck, radio, racist, advertising. Add Tags
Donna Barstow is a cartoonist for Parade, The New Yorker, Barrons, Harvard Business Review, The LA Times, etc.
Her feature on restaurants, "Daily Special," runs in very important mainstream and alternative papers.
She edited and cartooned two books: "What Do Women Really Want? Chocolate!", and "Love Me or Go to Hell," and a calendar.
She has an orange canary, and collects priceless jewelry.
Visit Donna Barstow's Blog.
The Opposite of Wrong
© 2009 Donna Barstow - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2009. UCLICK LLC, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy


Comments (32) Jump to Comments Form
toasteroven said, 2 months ago
Forget the meeting. By that column of shifting brown smoke over there, I’d say that the local chemical plant is on fire! You can argue about Glenn Beck later, people! Evacuate!
meowdam said, 2 months ago
Glenn Beck the new Cocopuffs mascot .
I love him , Imagine the new GOP pep rally Show
America’s front line : Hosted by Rush with Regulars Sarah the quitter Palin , Joe the unlicensed plumber,Dick Cheney’s Daughter ( why we care what she says I’m not sure ) , Glenn ( fruit loops ) Beck , Bill ( pitch a hissy ) O’Rielly ,
Kind of like a sick twisted PeeWee’s playhouse
I’d watch ,
HOWGOZIT said, 2 months ago
Meow–must be on your ninth life.
churchillwasright said, 2 months ago
And yet his ratings are astronomical. Must drive the left nuts.
charliekane said, 2 months ago
Pro wrestling, the Three Stooges and the Roman circus are/were popular, too.
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
^ It’s us on the left who watch. We get some popcorn, sit, watch, and laugh our @ss off. Birthers, Deathers, Death Panels, FEMA Camps, Tea Baggers, I want my country back, LOL. What will you think of next ? It’s like watching Seinfeld, All in the family, or something, like a reality show for mental midgets, It’s funny !
striper77 said, 2 months ago
The liberals always complain when a good man knows the difference between right and wrong.
The liberals will call him racists, right wing, Nazi, etc.
Here is a picture of the liberal / democrat meeting. All the abortion doctors and abortion groups would be their. All the sexual perverts would be their. You could top it off with NGLTF, NEA, ACLU, NAACP, NOW and the unions would be giving their support for these causes.
Then they would state how great a job Ted Kennedy did fighting for these causes. They then would dilute it down to say he was a good man and help the less fortunate.
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
Striper, didn’t you know Glen Beck is a transvestite.
He cries like a little Girl. He’s been caught stealing panties off of clotheslines.
Maybe that dont make him all bad, but he’s a Big liar on top of it !
striper77 said, 2 months ago
Seniorbullwinkle,
I read your lies. But, then I realized that you were putting down your life’s accomplishments.
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
^ Well, if that’s the case, then I see by this one, and your previous posts, that YOUR Accomplishments are Much More extensive than mine.
(in short, I know you are, but what am I ?)
striper77 said, 2 months ago
Seniorbullwinkle,
I have read some of your remarks. You are usually auguring with other people on the other side of your political arena.
Not to long ago you were auguring with someone on the same political side as yours and you stated that you were indeed a homosexual. These were your own words. You went into great detail. I thought maybe you were being sarcastic but you went on and on. It was your rant on living in the desert and complaining about people spending their money on RV’s, guns, motor bikes etc.
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
What planet did you say you were from , Honey ?
( again, I know you are, so what am I ? Girlfriend ! )
http://tinyurl.com/mdzp85
http://tinyurl.com/lkvgr8
http://tinyurl.com/lbxaa7
http://tinyurl.com/m38c95
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
Striper, I wasn’t going to take the bait, But If your going to put words in my mouth, I’m going to have to ask you to back it up. Where in the F’ing world did you read this ?
Are you talking about Assways Aug. 21 ? Because if you are, you cant understand simple English.
further more, you’re the only one on these pages that talks about bestiality, nambla, and all kinds of perversions. Which makes me think you protest too much ! It makes me think you’re a twisted tortured sex freak, that cant think of anything that’s not sexual. You’re a sorry, sick little puppy, thats needs professional help. I pity you.
parkersinthehouse said, 2 months ago
hola Sr. “toro”, mi amigo, estás hablando del video, calle 13? ¡Es impresionante! (¿usted es latino?) scuse me if not.
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
yo mio es gringo. yo vivo des minutos from el frontera. Mi gusto la mexican musica., e tu ? Muy mi latino / latina amigos vivo en Mexico.
http://tinyurl.com/m2nrmr
http://tinyurl.com/mok4lw
striper77 said, 2 months ago
I am just laying out the sickening things that the democrat party is doing under the Obama administration. Since they are passing laws for the people in question, I am just putting out their so the liberals such as yourself will know what is going on.
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
Striper, you can’t be as dim witted as you make yourself out to be, other wise your fingers would slip off the keyboard from all the drool and short out.
No one is passing laws that will let you marry your Cow, besides, you can get the milk for a $1.99 a Gal.at the store.
Striper, NO ONE IS THAT DUMB !, Now if you have a link or an article, or SOMETHING, We would all be interested to see it. All you want to do, is throw wild accusations round and hope some Idiot lesser than yourself (although that’s hard to imagine) will believe you.
My Challenge ; Show us something other than your wild imagination.
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
A real smörgåsbord of promiscuity. It all looks so Good, problem is where to begin !
Listen you Idiot, SEX IS BETWEEN TWO CONSENTING ADULTS. The only thing that will be changed is that two people of the same sex shall not be discriminated. Get over it. ANYTHING ELSE IS AGAINST THE LAW. This law does not supersede or override existing laws. Do you think no one has a brain ? This is exactly why you religious zealots are labeled NUT CASES. I’ll give you a million dollars if they make any of that bleeep legal. (except homosexuality) Dont be an IDIOT, they are lying to you. Never in a million years, will any of this ever happen. If you want to hate Democrats, Fine, Do It, but dont make up wild crazy bleeepe and call it real. What Senator or Congress person, is saying this ? I’d like to give them a piece of my mind.If it’s your church, go find a new church. You have surrounded yourself with liars, and not very smart liars.
PS,The manual of mental disorders, happens to be your Biography.
http://tinyurl.com/m92wxq
striper77 said, 2 months ago
This bill has already passed the house. The democrats for it and the republicans against it. The democrats in the senate had it added to the defense bill in order to get it passed. If the republicans vote against it the democrats and the media will start running ads calling them anti military. You know the drill or at least should. Kind of like all the millions of dollars spent on ads for the Obamacare.
parkersinthehouse said, 2 months ago
Good grief striper!
here it is again:
1913 is NOT PROTECTING ANYBODY, PERIOD.
1913 is SUPPORT TO STATES TO PROSECUTE HATE CRIMES WITH A PARTICULAR LENGTH OF IMPRISONMENT FOR THE OFFENDER PERIOD.
There is NO LIST OF ABERRANT BEHAVIOR. IT’S
YOUR OWN LIST, STRIPER. NOT PROPOSED PROTECTIVE LEGISLATION. PERIOD.
good grief!
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1913/text
DrCanuck said, 2 months ago
I thought we had agreed to ignore this turkey.
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
Thank you Parker.
striper77 said, 2 months ago
The bill is S. 909. Here is some information on it.
Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Florida, admitted from the House Floor that the latest “hate crimes” bill put 547 acts of sexual deviancies compiled by the American Psychiatric Association, which he referred to as “all of these ‘philias’ and fetishes and ‘isms’” on the same level of elevated protection as “race … religion … gender … or disability.”
http://www.operationsaveamerica.org/536.htm
Wildcard24365 said, 2 months ago
From what I can see, H.R. 1913 only says the Feds will assist local law enforcement agencies in investigating violent crimes if they are:
“…motivated by prejudice based on the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim, or is a violation of the State, local, or tribal hate crime laws.”
(Sec 3.A.1.c)
I find it to be redundant, really, as all violent crimes should be investigated and prosecuted to their full extent. I feel there is something about “Thou shalt not kill (or maim, or hurt, or incapacitate…)” that it should apply to everybody.
Some people, however, seem to feel otherwise.
HUMPHRIES
said,
2 months ago
Why is it that crack-pots post and post and post in the hopes that someone will be fooled into thinking they know something?
striper77 said, 2 months ago
Why do most liberals belong to the 547 acts of sexual deviancies compiled by the American Psychiatric Association?
cdward said, 2 months ago
striper, you have got to be just plain nuts. Aside from that, your condemnations of S 909 are invalid. Whether you think it’s necessary or not (and that *is* a valid debate), it does not do the silly things you claim. Here is the official summary of S909.
4/28/2009–Introduced.
Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act - Adopts the definition of “hate crime” as set forth in the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (i.e., a crime in which the defendant intentionally selects a victim or, in the case of a property crime, the property that is the object of the crime because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any person). Authorizes the Attorney General to:
(1) provide state, local, or tribal law enforcement agencies with technical, forensic, prosecutorial, or other assistance in the investigation or prosecution of violent crimes and hate crimes; and
(2) award grants to assist such agencies with the extraordinary expenses associated with the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes. Authorizes the Office of Justice Programs to award grants to state, local, or tribal programs designed to combat hate crimes committed by juveniles. Authorizes appropriations to the Department of Justice (DOJ), including the Community Relations Service, for FY2010-FY2012 to prevent and respond to hate crime acts. Amends the federal criminal code to prohibit willfully causing bodily injury to any person because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of such person. Amends the Hate Crimes Statistics Act to expand data collection and reporting requirements under such Act to include:
(1) crimes manifesting prejudice based on gender and gender identity; and
(2) hate crimes committed by and against juveniles. Declares that nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit the exercise of constitutionally-protected free speech.
striper77 said, 2 months ago
Cdward,
All the conservative groups are stating the information I have posted. This time it came from the American Family Association.
If you believe in what I have posted or not, it does not matter. But, I do have one questions for you. If it is already against the law to do anything to anybody regardless. Why does the government lead by and written by the democrats need to call these certain perverts out and make a special law for them. And then have with money available for prosecution?
Why not make a law if any black man calls a white man a honkey or cracker a federal offense?
What if a black man attacks a white man make it a federal offense?
It sounds awkward but it happens all the time.
What if a white man calls a black man a racial slur or, oh that is already protected under the hate crimes act.
So I ask you are your nuts or does any of this make sense?
cdward said, 2 months ago
It’s perfectly legal for a white man to call a black man anything he wants - and vice versa. That’s freedom of speech. That would be entirely UNAFFECTED by S909.
Whether it’s a worthwhile law or not, (and as I said, that’s debatable), it would only apply if some other law is violated in conjunction with it. For example, vandalism is illegal. This weekend down on Long Island vandalism was committed against a church with predominantly hispanic members. That’s illegal, I think we can all agree. But the vandalism was in the form of racial slurs with implied threats (essentially saying that hispanics didn’t belong and would be driven out). S 909 would not make the vandalism any more illegal but would add to be punishment because of the racist nature and reason for the vandalism.
The same is true with battery. If you beat someone up, it’s illegal. The law would simply make the punishment more severe if the beating was motivated by racial, sexual or some other form of group hatred.
By the way, I do not think that being gay makes you a pervert. Sorry you do. But the reason for the law is because minority groups are easy to pick on (there are fewer of them, they don’t have as much power) - so I believe the point of the law is to say, if you pick on the especially powerless because they belong to that powerless and often despised group, you deserve and extra helping of whack-upside-the-head.
senorbullwinkle
said,
2 months ago
STRIPER, Sorry, I didn’t bother to read YOUR bill. Just listening to you, I knew you had it all wrong.
Let me try to explain somethings to you. Let’s say a Jew’s car breaks down in Selma Alabama, on a Saturday night. He walks to a store to make a phone call. As he walks past a Bar on the way, some guys come out and start pushing him around cause he has a funny looking hat and curls. They call him Christ killer and Jew boy. Their having fun beating the hell out of him. Then things get out of hand and they light the guy on fire and he dies. Small town sheriff comes around, and he knows the “Good ‘O Boys, one of them is his brother-in-law. Sheriff says the man died cause he was smoking with a can of gas even though his head is cracked and has some broken bones.
Now the federal government can step in, It’s now a FEDERAL hate crime. No more local cops, sweeping it under the rug. This will end those days.
This helps you STRIPER. No more burning down “The Church Of Nut’s” cause the town folks don’t like you.
In the south, theres like 10 Church’s burnt down every month.
They dragged an old black man, with a chain, behind a truck until his head fell off, and were mad that he got blood on the chain.
A 20 year old guy was beaten unconscious, then tied him naked with barbed wire, to a barbed wire fence and left him to freeze to death. Not that he did anything, just that he was gay.
There are places that the local law just dont care what happens to some people. They dont care if their house, car, or Church get vandalized or even burnt down. This will help put a stop to that.
http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/civilrights/hate.htm
I didn’t think of it until now, but maybe STRIPER you’re upset because this will clamp down on skinheads, the Klan, and other Groups that you belong to. People who feel they have a right to kill people they dont agree with.
Let me remind you what republicans said when they began to wire tap. If you got nothing to hide, you got nothing to worry about !
PS, Striper, I’d like to know, Does GOD talk to you ?
NoFearPup
said,
2 months ago
If I bring my shiny white self to downtown St.Louis and get beaten up and killed by black youths while their parents and neighbors watch, laughing and calling me “cracker”, would the perpetrators be charged with an “hate” crime? Probably not - which points out the inherent injustice and non-necessity of the “hate crimes” bill. Let’s make our congress-people do something useful while they are in Congress, like lock the Chambers’ doors and go home.
tpenna
said,
2 months ago
By the way, striper77, I’m holding the DSM-IV in front of me right now. The American Family Association is lying about the list of “mental disorders”. Homosexuality is nowhere on the list. Neither are bisexuality, transsexuality, prostitution, or heterosexuality (odd that the AFA would put this one on a list of disorders). Since 1974, the APA has not considered these to be mental disorders.
So I’m calling BS on your source. I guess they weren’t counting on any intelligent people with access to the DSM-IV reading their mendacious posting. I’m not willing to entertain anything coming from such lying bigots.