Dilbert Classics by Scott Adams

Dilbert Classics

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Sisyphos

    Sisyphos said, about 2 years ago

    Okay, maybe it is an invasion of privacy…. So whaddya goin’ tah do ’bout it?

  2. t jacobs

    t jacobs said, about 2 years ago

    are there free drugs?

  3. Chrisstopher

    Chrisstopher said, about 2 years ago

    Too many people are just sheep. Way to go!

  4. BuckyKatt999

    BuckyKatt999 said, about 2 years ago

    In his case, drugs might be a good idea.

  5. BuckyKatt999

    BuckyKatt999 said, about 2 years ago

    I worked at a local supermarket chain that had to do 2 random drug tests a month for their insurance. They claimed the choices were random, but somehow I kept getting picked—so I figure they knew I was safe and were using me to protect other employees.
    I quit, too, but not because of that.

  6. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, about 2 years ago

    Yeah, well, who doesn’t?

  7. MeGoNow

    MeGoNow said, about 2 years ago

    Sad that, there you were, surrounded by books, many of which contained the information, still without the barest notion of the function of the rights provisions in the Constitution, an ignorance that should have dissipated in junior high school.

  8. BRI-NO-MITE!!

    BRI-NO-MITE!! GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    As I bus driver I get pulled for a random “whizz quiz” every so often. Last time this happened, I was pulled aside after my run and was not allowed to use the restroom until the nurse showed up an hour later. If they do this to me again, I’m going to stand in the middle of the dispatch office and soil myself in protest.

  9. hendrix_david

    hendrix_david said, about 2 years ago

    Wally Johnson?! … and married?!

  10. Cripplious

    Cripplious said, about 2 years ago

    Actually he is just a man who looks like wally. This explains it as much as you can trust wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wally_(Dilbert)

  11. Nabuquduriuzhur

    Nabuquduriuzhur said, about 2 years ago

    It shouldn’t be random. There needs to be “reasonable suspicion” at a minimum. When somebody is stoned, it’s not like the others on the job don’t notice.
    .
    What’s funny is that people on drugs often think they are hiding it. A fellow some years back on the job bragged that he bet I couldn’t guess he’d done pot almost a week before. Seeing as he was just beginning to come down, it was a silly thing to say.
    .
    This stuff can’t be hidden. The person thinks it is, but the fifth time they drop the same object, or keep missing in trying to pick up a pen, or the eyes won’t stay on one spot, or the pupils are fixed , or they are driving in the wrong lane (people on pot have miserable depth perception) etc., it’s pretty obvious what’s going on.
    .
    The slight slurring of speech in the casual user and the heavy slurring of speech in the heavy user are not hideable either. IF people are paying attention: when Gore was running for office, it was almost funny to watch him try to do debates and speeches when it was obvious that a few minutes before he’d been smoking pot. I do have to hand it to his speech pathologist(s). I’ve never met a stoner who didn’t have severe speech problems after using pot for four or five years. Gore’s speech coaches did an extremely good job.

  12. Carl R

    Carl R said, about 2 years ago

    Pixie there were no constitutional issues here. They can require tests, but, of course, you can decide to work elsewhere. You will find that some jobs require tests, others don’t. It will always be up to you whether you choose to agree to the testing or not.

  13. Refresh Comments.