Dick Locher by Dick Locher

Dick Locher

Recommended

Comments (15) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. cubefarmer

    cubefarmer said, 6 months ago

    Dispose without opening.

  2. feverjr

    feverjr said, 6 months ago

    To drive a car, you have to have to pass a test to get a license and have proof of insurance. In 2005, Bush signed a law to shield gun companies from being sued. If the companies can’t be sued then it’s time for gun owners to carry insurance.

  3. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, 6 months ago

    ^ooooh, now there’s a GREAT idea! and so capitalist too. the repubblicans ought to LOVE that. private insurance company profits!!!!!!!

  4. phdtogo

    phdtogo said, 6 months ago

    @feverjr

    Following your logic, let’s pass a law that places liability with auto makers for traffic deaths caused by the driver.

  5. echoraven

    echoraven said, 6 months ago

    The box is missing the disclaimer “may not work as intended” since gun laws only stroke the egos of the lefty Kool Aid lovers.

  6. Radish

    Radish said, 6 months ago

    @echoraven

    So you’re in favor of dead children?

  7. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, 6 months ago

    ^only if they are other peoples children.

  8. Dredpiraterobt$

    Dredpiraterobt$ said, 6 months ago

    The “toy” includes a GPS system that disables the gun in designated areas. A blood flow fingerprint reader trigger that only fires for the registered user(s).
    .
    Bullets for all old guns are illegal, thus obsoleting the guns.
    .
    Bullets for all new guns come with “dna” microdata dust throughout the bullet that identifies the owner.
    .
    Good news, your gun can now be fully automatic and you can carry it where ever you want! But it won’t work in MOST of those places.

  9. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, 6 months ago

    @feverjr

    Gun companies can be sued.

  10. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, 6 months ago

    @Radish

    Go ahead pick any other method that children are killed. Do you favor those? There is no reasoning in your question.

  11. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, 6 months ago

    @dannysixpack

    Just another angry liberal with no sense.

  12. feverjr

    feverjr said, 6 months ago

    @sw10mm

    Public Law 109–92
    109th Congress
    An Act
    To prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers,
    distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages,
    injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others.
    ………………….
    http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ92/pdf/PLAW-109publ92.pdf
    ………………….
    There are exceptions but the actual purpose of the bill was to give relief to gun manufacturers, importers, dealers from already pending litigation.
    …………………..
    Both sides…
    “Wayne LaPierre, the NRA’s executive vice president, called the vote “a historic day for the NRA and also for the Second Amendment.” Saying that Congress “saved the firearms industry today,” LaPierre asserted that “the people that want to ban guns in this country have not been able to win in the political arena” and thus have resorted to “a blizzard of litigation to bankrupt the industry with legal fees.” He estimated that the law would cut off 15 current lawsuits around the country.

    But Dennis Henigan, director of the legal action project at the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, called the legislation “such an egregious piece of special-interest legislation, it is almost shameless.” He said the law would violate a basic premise of tort law because it “retroactively bars lawsuits against a particular industry, even if the members of that industry behave negligently.”
    …………………….
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/20/AR2005102000485.html

  13. echoraven

    echoraven said, 6 months ago

    @Radish

    Are you accusing me of being pro abortion? I like to consider myself neutral on that issue.

    Seriously though, how many laws were violated in that slaughter? How is another one gong to help? Last I checked killing children outside the womb was illegal (as well as killing school teachers, principals and your mom (not YOURS specifically but mothers as a group)).

    The problem with chronic kool aid drinkers is that you think a law will solve any problem and that the only good can come from the government and life is a little more complicated.

    Another thing you all fail to see is the more these horrible tragedies are prostituted, the more guns are sold. I’ve read that after every mass shooting gun sales go through the roof because people are afraid of politicians using the dead for political gain.

  14. Rey Iago

    Rey Iago said, 6 months ago

    Telling a woman what to do with her body… Well, you don’t really need two kidneys do you?
    Yes, it will lead to that.

  15. Rey Iago

    Rey Iago said, 6 months ago

    Soory, someone mentioned abortion.

  16. Refresh Comments.