Comments (37) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   win said, 9 months ago

   I’m not gonna be the one to say it…
2. 

   Wabbit said, 9 months ago

   very very correct! Except I’ve only heard about 2-3 people turning down money!
3. 

   Radish said, 9 months ago

   Mitt says, welfare for corporations is OK, but not for people.
4. 

   ne7minder55 said, 9 months ago

   Last panel is wrong! Look at those greedy bankers who took a couple trillion handout from Bush in 08. Heck the Marquis du Mittens himself has accepted government money to prop up businesses while Bain looted them. GE not only didn’t pay any money in Federal income tax they actually got several billion back despite making a large profit and the same year shipped 25,000 jobs overseas

   Enough money isn’t a concept they get
5. 

   LizardPriest said, 9 months ago

   Welfare for people is wrong. Wellfare for corporations is okay. Corporations are people. Head explodes.
6. 

   pdchapin said, 9 months ago

   But corporations are people, so corporate welfare is giving welfare to people. Romney is just another bleed heart liberal.
7. 

   Lynne B said, 9 months ago

   @ne7minder55

   Your irony meter is faulty. The last panel is what it is as a sarcastic comment on the fact that it never happens.

   
   When has a corporate moneybags ever turned down a subsidy?
8. 

   mtorres1982 said, 9 months ago

   They forgot mothers. I sat at home with the kids, therefore I don’t pay taxes because I don’t make any money. Apparently that means my opinion means nothing
9. 

   ronald rini said, 9 months ago

   I’m sorry there is a difference between hand up and a hand out.
10. 

    phritzg said, 9 months ago

    If panel 3 is supposed to be a VA hospital, that’s me 3 times in the last 2 years, although not as an amputee.
11. 

    cactusjack99 said, 9 months ago

    yeah, you victim you, i’m up in panel 1, collecting social security. of course, the Mitt did not mention that I have paid over $110k into the system since 1966, did he now? My only complaint about the above is panel 4, heck, we are still giving oil companies govment subsidies, how dumb is that??
12. 

    cactusjack99 said, 9 months ago

    oh, now I get it, he was being sarcastic in panel 4! thanks for pointing that out!
13. 

    Lynne B said, 9 months ago

    @ronald rini

    …and I’m sorry that elsewhere you have allied yourself with a party which seems to see no such distinction, and you don’t seem to have noticed that.
14. 

    Lynne B said, 9 months ago

    @mtorres1982

    Well gosh, according to much of the current direction of the Republican party, your opinion means nothing because you have a uterus. Unless you happen to agree with them, of course, in which case you are a virtuous example of motherhood. I mean, unless you’ve been drawing government benefits, that is. Although motherhood is glorious, and women should be at home with their kids. But not if you’re not contributing to society. …

    
    Did you follow that? Ok, neither did I. And now my head hurts.
15. 

    peachyanddanny said, 9 months ago

    God said trains, RMoney thought He said brains.
16. Load the rest of the comments (22).