Dan Wasserman by Dan Wasserman

Dan Wasserman

Recommended

Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    I have one word and I only need one word to disprove your “oh no the seas rising we must do something right now”
    Erosion

  2. Paul Harvey

    Paul Harvey said, about 1 year ago

    The land between England and France was once dry, there was no English Channel. Sea levels have been riasing for more that 2K years, long before man made a smokestack.

  3. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Well….still….the people – YOUR brothers and sisters – on the mountaintops in the middle of the sea will one day have a problem. Let’s prepare our great grand children for the eventuality

  4. lichtentunes

    lichtentunes said, about 1 year ago

    The recent increased solar flare activity probably has had no effect on the earth’s climate, right? The sun is so far away… When I go outside on a hot day I can’t feel the heat of the sun on my cheek. But I can sure feel those carbon molecules heating up the atmosphere. I’m almost afraid to breathe. Oops! I exhaled and released some dreaded Co2. Panic panic panic. And charge me a fine for breathing.

  5. Rockngolfer

    Rockngolfer said, about 1 year ago

    “Science literacy is a vaccine against the charlatans of the world that would exploit your ignorance.”
    -Neil deGrasse Tyson

  6. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, about 1 year ago

    At issue is whether you believe scientists hired by the Koch brothers and Fox News, or real scientists.

  7. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, about 1 year ago

    @Chillbilly

    You mean the real scientists that have lied in all of their reports over at least the last ten years?

  8. hancel

    hancel said, about 1 year ago

    I am amazed of the amount of people still with their head in the sand….justify your objections to your tiny little minds…climate change IS real..

  9. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    I find it interesting that the Koch foundation is one of the supporters of “Nova” a PBS science series, and the Koch brothers spend most of their time getting morons to deny all science.


    BTW, most of those “once dry land” areas deniers come up with is also hilarious as it had nothing to do with “warming” or CO2, but plate tectonics. The “English” Channel was created the same way that the Catalina Channel was. None of the folks recognizing AGW is real are claiming “warming” is the reason Mt Whitney in California, or Mt Everest in Nepal, have sea shells at the top. However those elements do prove geology is real, and the flood of Noah was a total myth.

  10. Stipple

    Stipple said, about 1 year ago

    Yes, it was right after 9-11 and there was a large secret conference of unrelated scientists. Half the attendees were translators as all these scientists do not speak the same language.
    About the only thing all of the scientists understood was the need to fool the Americans.
    Luckily even those from the poorer counties kept the secret even though no money was changing hands. A scam this large is done for love, not money.

  11. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 1 year ago

    @onguard

    Who? The whole General Assembly? Or just the Security Council? And just where is the UN getting the money from Global Warming? And was this before or after Elvis and JFK flew the airplane into the Pentagon?

  12. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @lonecat

    Let’s see. The UN Dept of Economic and Social Affairs did a study and proposed the UN levy taxes on developed countries to aid the undeveloped ones; The report contain this suggestion:

    a tax on carbon dioxide emissions in developed countries: a tax of $25 per tonne would raise an estimated $250 billion per year, collected by national authorities, but earmarked for international cooperation;"

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/un-proposes-global-taxes-fund-global-challenges-such-climate-change

    http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/policy/wess2012.html

    So while it is a “proposal” and won’t fly in the US (really? The UN? OK, you tax us and we will make you pay the rent…back rent too….that ought to pay the tax for the next hundred years or so) But you see that the idea IS being considered.

  13. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 1 year ago

    @Bruce4671

    Bruce, thanks, you taught me something. I’m still not convinced by onguard’s post.

  14. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @DrCanuck

    Doc please.

    I never once (ever) suggested that carbon emissions do not exist OR that they are not a problem to be solved. But does a global carbon tax do that? What will the tax do to eliminate the problem of carbon emissions? At best the tax is only a method to redistribute wealth unless the money collected is spent entirely on research to eliminate carbon emissions or recycle CO2. As to the last one, read this:

    http://www.americanenergyindependence.com/recycleco2.aspx

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2011/08/110811-turning-carbon-emissions-into-fuel/

    http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2010/July/28071001.asp

    Come on, it is not an unsolvable problem.

  15. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Regional impacts of AGW were being studied before environmental laws changed the “models”, but not the FACT that humans were changing climates around the world, in the early 1950’s by among others, Raymond Dasmann. That change is now global, not just regional, is the outcome of ignoring those earlier studies, and insufficient changes in the way humans “do business”.


    That “deniers” are of two phases, profiteers, and idiots, is also the history of “human development”.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (2).