Dan Wasserman by Dan Wasserman

?fh=fa2f1a4a97ecd39e65ab99d0191a5ff0

Comments (32) Jump to Comments Form

  1. cdward

    cdward said, 7 months ago

    HaHaHaHaHa!

  2. tracht47

    tracht47 said, 7 months ago

    How are we going to miss you if you never say good-bye?

  3. LLeRay

    LLeRayGenius_badge said, 7 months ago

    I must like this other comic about Coleman’s attitude toward the voters in Minnesota.

    http://tinyurl.com/dkg3j6

  4. tracht47

    tracht47 said, 7 months ago

    LLeRay-Great link!

  5. Kingoswald

    KingoswaldGenius_badge said, 7 months ago

    “Say Goodbye, Norm”.
    “Goodbye, Norm”

  6. stealth6948

    stealth6948 said, 7 months ago

    The Guy is a Joke,,,, Instead of gracefully admitting defeat, He determined to make Franklan more popular.

  7. HOWGOZIT

    HOWGOZIT said, 7 months ago

    Better a joke than a complete idiot like Franken is

  8. LLeRay

    LLeRayGenius_badge said, 7 months ago

    How many books have you written that were on the best-seller list, HOWGO ZIT?

  9. danielsangeo

    danielsangeo said, 7 months ago

    How did a “complete idiot” get so many votes?

  10. churchillwasright

    churchillwasright said, 7 months ago

    I wouldn’t let frankin babysit my dog– I’d be afraid he’d kick him!

  11. tracht47

    tracht47 said, 7 months ago

    Why would your dog kick Al Franken?

  12. senorbullwinkle

    senorbullwinkleGenius_badge said, 7 months ago

    BAD DOG. must be a republican.

  13. HOWGOZIT

    HOWGOZIT said, 7 months ago

    daniels–he ran in MN where they also elected a WWF governor. Not to mention ACORN

  14. lalas

    lalas said, 7 months ago

    We’re working on Instant Runoff Voting here since we haven’t had a governor with a plurality Since 1994, Norm didn’t win with one either, but Klobuchar did with 58%.

    Howgozit – nice job of spitting out the ACORN talking point. Bravo! So you have links that demonstrate anything that ACORN did wrong in MN? BTW…. Jesse was a loud-mouth but he wasn’t a bad governor.

  15. danielsangeo

    danielsangeo said, 7 months ago

    “he ran in MN where they also elected a WWF governor.”

    And? An actor was president of the United States, too.

    “Not to mention ACORN”

    What about them?

  16. HOWGOZIT

    HOWGOZIT said, 7 months ago

    That’s right libs–ignore ACORN and their voter registration process everywhere

  17. danielsangeo

    danielsangeo said, 7 months ago

    HOWGOZIT: “Not to mention ACORN”

    lalas: “So you have links that demonstrate anything that ACORN did wrong in MN?”

    danielsangeo: “What about [ACORN]?”

    HOWGOZIT: “That’s right libs–ignore ACORN”

    Doesn’t look like we’re ignoring it. Looks like you’re trying to dodge. What about ACORN? Like lalas asked you, do you have some evidence of wrongdoing by ACORN in MN or something?

  18. lalas

    lalas said, 7 months ago

    StewZ the joke is that the seat is empty and MN is being denied our Constitutional Right to representation?

    Daniel… what about ACORN?

  19. danielsangeo

    danielsangeo said, 7 months ago

    “Daniel… what about ACORN?”

    That’s what I’m asking HOWGOZIT.

  20. deadheadzan

    deadheadzanGenius_badge said, 7 months ago

    Howgozit is referring to Churchhill’s claim that Frankin is just not a nice guy. Which matters?-NOT! He has written books, has a stable married life to the same spouse of 25 years. He will make a very good senator.

  21. lalas

    lalas said, 7 months ago

    DHZ – what about ACORN?

  22. HOWGOZIT

    HOWGOZIT said, 7 months ago

    ACORN is being investigated for voter fraud by registering dead folks, folks that are not even real, fictitious names etc., etc. I have no reason to feel it doesn’t include MN. LL and Senor, you have all the facts, show me where there is no registration fraud on the part of ACORN

  23. danielsangeo

    danielsangeo said, 7 months ago

    “ACORN is being investigated for voter fraud by registering dead folks, folks that are not even real, fictitious names etc., etc.”

    ACORN doesn’t register voters.

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6049529&page=1

    “But…voter fraud worries – about Acorn or anyone else – are unsupported by the facts, said experts on election fraud, who recall similar concerns being raised in several previous elections, despite a near-total absence of cases.”

    “There’s no evidence that any of these invalid registrations lead to any invalid votes…The Justice Department really made prosecution of voter fraud of this sort a big priority in the first half of this decade, and they really didn’t come up with anything.” – David Becker

    “show me where there is no registration fraud on the part of ACORN”

    Show me where there are no flying pigs.

  24. HOWGOZIT

    HOWGOZIT said, 7 months ago

  25. NoFearPup

    NoFearPupGenius_badge said, 7 months ago

    No, ACORN just enables other people to falsely claim on election day that they are being kept off the rolls- so the voting attendees keep the ballots - which allows ACLU lawyers to claim later that those voters were being kept from voting legally; anybody got any other scenarios; we’ve seen a bit of that here in St. Louis. How about the tricky-tricky butterfly ballots; so simple any Jim Daley knows how to foul them up with legal proceedings…

  26. cdward

    cdward said, 7 months ago

    Howgozit, that is a real objective source you cite there. NOT!

  27. kellykid

    kellykid said, 7 months ago

    It doesn’t need to be objective, only accurate - not like the reference to abc.com above.

  28. cdward

    cdward said, 7 months ago

    Employment Policies Institute is neither objective nor accurate. They are of the ilk that have an agenda and bend all data to fit their agenda.

  29. HOWGOZIT

    HOWGOZIT said, 7 months ago

    cd–typical; if you don’t agree call it a “lie” Either way Franken is an idiot comedian–just like Gerafalo.

  30. danielsangeo

    danielsangeo said, 7 months ago

    Let’s put it this way: I’ll believe the Justice Department before I’ll believe an institute that is NOT an expert on the matter.

  31. HOWGOZIT

    HOWGOZIT said, 7 months ago

    Daniels–expert because you say so–solid reasoning. More like if you agree, they are experts stating facts.

  32. danielsangeo

    danielsangeo said, 7 months ago

    No. Expert because they’ve investigated the matter fully and have the authority to do so.