Comments (16) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   MexicanCommunist said, about 1 year ago

   in the minds of republicans

2. 

   IrishEddieOHara said, about 1 year ago

   She has more experience than the Obamamessiah, but that’s not why I am voting for McCain/Palin. I’m voting to keep the baby murderer out of the White House. That’s all that matters now.

3. 

   Kingoswald said, about 1 year ago

   Eddie - if you come here for the politics, do you go to Free Republic for the funny pages?

4. 

   lalas said, about 1 year ago

   What about the babies that are murdered in Iraq? What about the babies that starve here? What about the babies that die w/o health care? What about the babies that now have a $10T debt with their names on it? Nah… there’s only ONE issue going on. Gently place your head back in the sand the blunt trauma of your last insertion has obviously done a lot of damage.

5. 

   Corosive Frog said, about 1 year ago

   I can and I say lalas is right

6. 

   motivemagus said, about 1 year ago

   Can you say “token?”
   
   Incidentally, for those blithely throwing around the term “pro-life,” the term properly includes stands against capital punishment and euthanasia as well as abortion (and arguably warfare as well). That’s the Catholic stance, for example, which is why the Pope and Bush have had a few disagreements. The conservative Republicans only seem to want to protect life in the womb – once you’re born, you’re on your own.

7. 

   ConservativeBob said, about 1 year ago

   “What about the babies that are murdered in Iraq?”

   By whom? By us? Sorry you’re wrong if you think that. By the way the media won’t report this but we just HANDED ANBAR PROVIDENCE OVER TO THE IRAQIS. I guess babies won’t be dying all that much over there now will they? It’s a good thing Obama voted for the surge that allowed this to happen….oh wait.

   “What about the babies that starve here? What about the babies that die w/o health care?”

   Hmm haven’t heard anything about babies starving in America but oh well. I’m sure if we get universal health it won’t only be the babies dying because of the healthcare system…so will all the people waiting in the lines for surgery. But you just keep on listing statistics that don’t exist. One day you might get one right…kinda like the 1000 monkeys with 1000 typewriters thing.

   ““What about the babies that now have a $10T debt with their names on it?””

   Can’t argue with the debt issue but you’re probably going to say that it is entirely Bush’s fault and not the free spending, do nothing congress which is compromised of BOTH parties. Yes BOTH parties are failing us right now…not just one.

   “Gently place your head back in the sand the blunt trauma of your last insertion has obviously done a lot of damage.”

   You first.

8. 

   ConservativeBob said, about 1 year ago

   No they obviously must want an inexperienced, anti-life, terrorist befriending, terrorist supported, racist black liberationist, ALSO drilling zealot.

9. 

   MexicanCommunist said, about 1 year ago

   You want to know which babies starve here?
   MY BABIES

   And why? because some confederate idiot doesn’t want brown people walking around his front yard.
   Which is kind of the definition of Xenophobia

10. 

    Corosive Frog said, about 1 year ago

    the conservatives who heroically call themselves “pro-life” are more “pro-birth”; we don’t care what kind of LIFE the poor kid has, as long as he’s born.

11. 

    ConservativeBob said, about 1 year ago

    “You want to know which babies starve here?
    MY BABIES

    And why? because some confederate idiot doesn’t want brown people walking around his front yard.
    Which is kind of the definition of Xenophobia”

    If YOUR babies are starving than perhaps YOU should feed them. It’s amazing to me how America is simultaneously criticized for meddling in other countries affairs AND not helping those same countries do what they should be doing for themselves. No more double standards!

    If those “brown people” would come to the country LEGALLY no one would care. When they break OUR laws and demand OUR rights without being tax paying citizens that’s when people have a problem. And rightfully so.

12. 

    ConservativeBob said, about 1 year ago

    “the conservatives who heroically call themselves “pro-life” are more “pro-birth”; we don’t care what kind of LIFE the poor kid has, as long as he’s born”

    That’s because it’s not the government’s responsibility to be an individuals caretaker. To suggest that the government should do everything for everyone is EXTREMELY un-American and not at all what the founding fathers believed in.

13. 

    Corosive Frog said, about 1 year ago

    …but it’s the government job to tell people who to sleep with?

14. 

    ConservativeBob said, about 1 year ago

    I fail to see how the government has ever even so much as tried to tell the people who they can and cannot sleep with. I also don’t see either political party even advocating that. Please explain.

15. 

    ambellybutton said, about 1 year ago

    Anyway, I’m a woman and also Pro-Life (in all ways), pro-gun, creationist who says we should drill. And Palin has more executive experience than the other 3 candidates combined!

    You go Sarah!

16. 

    Kevin Parker said, about 1 year ago

    I especially like the part of “pro-life” that says raped women and girls who get pregnant as a result should be forced to bear their attackers’ children. Hard to believe, but Palin thinks that. Want her to be a 75-year-old-heartbeat away from making some Supreme Court appointments? Few Americans would if they knew the truth.