Dana Summers by Dana Summers

Dana Summers

Comments (13) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. tauyen

    tauyen said, over 1 year ago

    There aren’t enough cells to hold ’em all.

  2. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    One man’s “crazy” is another man’s “committed idealist”. That should not be forgotten.


    Most gun deaths in the U.S. are NOT the actions of a mentally ill person. Most terrorist acts are performed by “committed persons” out to make a point. (or get fame and publicity.)

  3. greyolddave

    greyolddave said, over 1 year ago

    I like Dana. She is so sensitive to the suffering of others.

  4. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, over 1 year ago

    It’s actually kind of frustrating. In Boston we blame the bomber, not the bomb. But in Sandy Hook, we blame the gun, not the shooter. Why is that?

  5. Mexícano

    Mexícano said, over 1 year ago

    @Wraithkin

    Porque tu no puedes ir a una store and buy a bomb. That’s why nobody blames the bomb. You would have to be a pendejo not to know that.

  6. Mexícano

    Mexícano said, over 1 year ago

    @coraryan

    Trata de no pensar mucho. Regulation and confiscation are two different this amigo.

  7. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, over 1 year ago

    @Mexícano

    You are missing the point. You can buy black powder, ball bearings, nails and pressure cookers without any form of checks. But you have to pass a background check to purchase weapons. But my point is this:

    Both people who committed these atrocities were evil. Adam Lanza took one life at a time, with many bullets. We blame the firearms. Whoever did this in Boston killed 3 and maimed over 150 with two bombs. We blame the bomber.

    Both of them are tragedies. But why in one are we singling out the tool and the other we are singling out the fool? Shouldn’t we be focusing on the individual who committed the crime, not the tools used to commit the crime?

    Also, speak English. I don’t speak Mexican, and you are posting on an English-speaking board. You intermingling your language detracts from your discussing points, and only can serve to get people irritated with you.

  8. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @kato1979

    “We had that once, but Reagan cut funding "


    And how many years ago was that and how many different regimes have we had in Washington that had the ability to change that situation? Try again.

  9. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    “Most gun deaths in the U.S. are NOT the actions of a mentally ill person.


    I guess that depends on what you consider mentally ill. Suicides and criminal shootings top out the list.

    “Two-thirds of all gun-related deaths in the United States are suicides.”


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_United_States

  10. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, over 1 year ago

    Wraithkin said, about 6 hours ago

    “It’s actually kind of frustrating. In Boston we blame the bomber, not the bomb. But in Sandy Hook, we blame the gun, not the shooter. Why is that?”

    very simple, if you don’t try to be dense.

    pressure cookers and mail are not expected to be lethal weapons. One does not approach a pressure cooker, or a letter with an expectation or a clue that they might end up dead or seriosly maimed. Killing and maiming is not the designed purpose of a pressure cooker or a letter.

    However, firearms ARE designed to kill and maim. It is their purpose in life. Any responsible firearm owner/handler is well aware of this and when responsible takes precautions that his firearm does not kill or main UNTIL s/he decides that it is appropriate to kill or maim (or threaten to kill or maim) with it.

    hope that clears up the difference for you between firearms, pressure cookers, letters, and i think we can throw automobiles in there too.

  11. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, over 1 year ago

    the action of the pressure cooker is to make delicious food. the action of a car is to transport. We all know what the action of a firearm is.

    can you actually sit there and expect us to believe after columbine, aurora, giffords, sandy hook, and now some 4 year old killed his mom (by accident) son of deputy, while they had their backs turned for a moment?

    I do not accept there is ‘no problem’, or that it is not firearm related.

  12. Mexícano

    Mexícano said, over 1 year ago

    @Ionizer

    “Still spouting tonteria.”


    ¿Tu puedes buy a bomb without a license and credentials? ¿No?


    “You can buy black powder, ball bearings, nails and pressure cookers without any form of checks.”


    Esas mercancias are intended for a proper use. Hay una reason porque you can’t sue a kitchen utensil company if someone was killed with one of their butcher’s knives. I fully understand the point. Tu on the other hand want to change the subject by injecting guns into the conversation. If I decide to use gasoline as a weapon instead of using it to make my car move then I am doing something illegal. Buying a gun with no background check to see if I am loco in the cabeza is a big time problem. Plus guns are used to kill.


    And I speak spangilsh you racist cabron. Learn to speak spanish. That is why the old joke that if you speak one language you are an American is so true.

  13. omQ Release the Desaparecidos

    omQ Release the Desaparecidos said, over 1 year ago

    @Wraithkin

    demanded: “Also, speak English. I don’t speak Mexican


    ROFL! I thought people really didn’t think that! I was wrong. :-)


    " You intermingling your language detracts from your discussing points, and only can serve to get people irritated with you."


    Au contraire, it adds to it.
    It’s entertaining and he gets his point across. Perhaps only those with knowledge of Spanish can truly appreciate the flow and style of the posts but there are enough of us, especialmente no EU da A.
    I really do like Mexicano’s style. It’s often funny, witty and also quite often, good satire.

  14. Refresh Comments.