Dana Summers by Dana Summers

Dana Summers

Comments (7) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, about 2 years ago

    they have probably already shredded and deleted the attempts to get security and then to be rescued…..it is probably the worst coverup in our history….4 Americans died at the Benghazi consulate and 2 more American Marines died in an attempted rescue…..source Reuters and an article quoting them, at www.americanthinker.com……9/29/12= 3 page printout…the 2 Americans died in an ambush trying to evacuate 37 Americans from the safe house to the airport.
    The Obama admin. at the very top level has been lying to the American people……and are now in the worst IMO coverup in my memory. The video was not the reason, it was Al Qaeda associated terrorists who planned a 9/11 attack and had no US resistance against mortar and RPGs….and no doubt a large unit of terrorists.
    When is Obama going to be made accountable????
    It is his idiotic policy of favoring these Muslim Brotherhood taught and trained terrorists. Will Congress stop the new $millions Obama is trying to send to Egypt and Libya?

  2. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Security, via “W” policies and budgeting, was by CONTRACTORS. It was a dangerous place and the Ambassador knew that going in, but from the description of the events, all details should NOT be “public” information, the contractors didn’t do a very good job. Part of the problem was that the “security plan” was well known to the aggressors, who blew that? The Contractors?

    Details of security measures and “intelligence” should NOT be made public, for the safety of current and future employees and military personnel. “Loose lips” seems to be the Faux demand.

  3. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, about 2 years ago

    Embassies are highly secure, well defended compounds. Consulates are small, often insecure buildings.

    I have lots of questions, since the story is full of inconsistencies.

    Why was the ambassador in the consulate instead of the Embassy, especially if the ‘journal recovered by a journalist’ is accurate, and the ambassador was very much afraid of a terrorist attack?

    Why did the Egyptian News Station do a story about the video during the week before 9/11 and demand that Muslims avenge the insult that had been on YouTube since June or July?

    Of course, the Arab terrorists who did the news story demanding jihad violated International Law by doing their news story in Arabic, so there was no way the US could have known, before the Ambassador was killed, that the story demanded that every decent Muslim must engage in jihad against the US, since the US cannot possibly use anyone who understands Arabic, because everyone who understands Arabic is obviously a terrorist.

    The Obamabot story is that there was nothing Obama could have done. Obamabots though they are, this is probably true.

    The anti-Obama story is that he had ample warning and let the ambassador be killed because he’s a Muslim who wants the infidels killed. The fact that he’s in an election and the death of the ambassador hurt him in the election is rather compelling evidence against that position.

    But there are so many inconsistences, all we know is that nothing we’ve read can possibly be accurate, since Truth cannot contradict itself.

  4. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    But truth is relative depending on the view point.

  5. Lektio

    Lektio said, about 2 years ago


    An interpretation of the truth may be relative to the view point, but in the end, there must be an absolute truth – we just probably will never really know for certain just what it is.

  6. Murphy224

    Murphy224 said, about 2 years ago

    Congressional Hearings

  7. coraryan

    coraryan GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Shameful – Hillary needs to resign if she can’t do better than this.

  8. Refresh Comments.