Dana Summers by Dana Summers

?fh=1d95f8df5ce7e410ec4bae0eaed11cff

Comments (37) Jump to Comments Form

  1. photomanfirst

    photomanfirst said, about 1 month ago

    Actually…. Rush would be lowering his standards to be associated with the NFL!

  2. scottfreitas

    scottfreitasGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    Finally, an HONEST editorial cartoon concerning the Rush/Rams “controversy.”

    I personally think the only real vice Rush has is his affection for professional sports. “Grown men playing with little balls”. Ho-hum.

    It’s a childish activity, say what you will. Boys do it for fun, and for needed exercise. Men should, at most, indulge in it for the same reasons.

    The fact most American males know far more about sports than they do about politics is partly why we have degraded–for all intents and purposes–into a feminist matriarchy controlled by Girl Government.

    Yeah, once we had the constantly-demonized Patriarchy, where women had husbands and kids had fathers. Now we have instead a Girl Government sponsored feminist matriarchy, where women have EBT cards (paid for mostly by the wifeless men who have been replaced by EBT cards) and kids are neglected, abused, and increasingly even killed, either by their own selfish-slut mothers or by the brain-dead boyfriends the aforementioned sluts bring home on any given night…

    No wonder Demoncrats call such behavior “progress!”

    (insert Hee Haw noises here)

  3. nomad2112

    nomad2112 said, about 1 month ago

    Great ‘toon.

  4. toasteroven

    toasteroven said, about 1 month ago

    scott.

    Your language is dishonest, insulting, and quite frankly, dull beyond measure. You spend paragraph after paragraph saying nothing at all, ranting at demons that only you can see. Feminist girls government? Selfish-slut mothers? Meaningless drivel.

    I recall that you once professed an admiration for George Orwell, due to, you said, his honesty. Yet every word you write is an insult to honest communication, every post an affront to the sort of honest language that Orwell spent so much time fighting for.

    Perhaps worst of all, you aren’t even funny anymore. And on the internet, that’s the highest crime.

  5. cdward

    cdward said, about 1 month ago

    Now, as to the ‘toon: It is correct that the NFL is absolutely full of small time criminals, and Rush could easily have fit in. However, he is even louder than the players, and the owners decided they did not need the distraction. It was a business decision not a political one. The end. If you don’t like our capitalist system, too bad.

    But like I said before, Rush is no martyr. He got what he wanted – attention.

  6. RussellNash

    RussellNash said, about 1 month ago

    Obviously the whole organization needs a good cleaning.

  7. bradwilliams

    bradwilliamsGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    Who was she Scottt? You clearly loved her very much and she did you wrong.

  8. omQ R

    omQ RGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    ^ I’ve been wondering the same. Maybe I should say “we” since there are others speculating.
    Perhaps simply an unrequited love? Who was Freitas’s little red-haired girl?

  9. cdward

    cdward said, about 1 month ago

    omQ R how do you do this with the picture? I will not speculate on scott’s private life.

  10. av8tor

    av8torGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    At least the NFL isn’t as bad as congress.. A close second..

    http://offtheedgehumor.blogspot.com/2009/09/football-player-art-donovan-on-johnny.html

  11. HOWGOZIT

    HOWGOZIT said, about 1 month ago

    Rams 0-5–can’t play for anyone–Dem/Rep; Lib/Cons; truth/lies.

  12. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, about 1 month ago

    Scottfreitas apparently thinks that Rush’s sex tourism, drug abuse, illegal misuse of drugs, and racism don’t count as “vices.” I don’t even mention the sexism, because he’s obviously down with that.

  13. charlie555

    charlie555 said, about 1 month ago

    om Q R

    Where are the formatting codes for this site? Does one need to be a genius to use them?

  14. omQ R

    omQ RGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    @Cdward I’ve been wary about posting images as it can present problems if everyone starts doing it! Size can be an issue. I’m currently on a PC that doesn’t have any image editing software so I couldn’t reduce the size of the Peanuts ‘toon. I’m also worried about image copy-right infringements. I half expect my post to be removed. If other forum members decide to use it, please keep other members in consideration. (although, I’m not really considering much of Scott. That makes me a hypocrite. :-/ )

    @Charlie555 I don’t believe one has to have a genius account.

    EDIT: I did provide a link earlier but on 2nd thoughts I can see some users misusing this. I just did!
    Therefore I will remove my image post and use instead a redirect url.

    Just before Satipera was removed from here I had provided a link to the same site. Hmmm, how do I provide this without seeming to be elitist?

  15. charlie555

    charlie555 said, about 1 month ago

    ^But where are the codes?

  16. omQ R

    omQ RGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    sigh I sense a Pandora’s box being opened…

    I will post the link but ask that others follow a gentleman/lady’s agreement to not abuse it?

    I grabbed it from Old Wolf’s Pibgorn fan site’s Unofficial Style Guide.

  17. charlie555

    charlie555 said, about 1 month ago

    Thanks, omQ R.

    It would just be more expressive to use italics and bold sometimes.

  18. wbr

    wbr said, about 1 month ago

    if there were codes omQ R would not be posting

  19. omQ R

    omQ RGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    ^ Dude, it isn’t the Enigma, I didn’t develop the codes, I found them by searching for them when standard html formating didn’t work. They aren’t mine and I take no credit for them, use them at your own peril but use them responsibly.
    If you cannot find them on this page, that’s your problem.

  20. HOWGOZIT

    HOWGOZIT said, about 1 month ago

    Make up some more motive–what an imagination!

  21. dsped

    dspedGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    Apples & oranges. Rush was aspiring to become an owner, not a player.

  22. HARVIN GWIN

    HARVIN GWIN said, about 1 month ago

    Ralph Reed told Lindsay Graham that scottfreitas really likes Rush…and not just for his body.

  23. cjr53

    cjr53 said, about 1 month ago

    Tap “Ignore Button”

    Scottsie clearly has a problem with females, it is noticeable in his ranting.

    Just my opinion from what I’ve read, but here goes:

    I’d imagine some woman took a little liking to him, thought he could be fixed, re-trained, changed or molded into her dream guy or some approximation thereof and the father of her children.

    With his self professed lack of income to support even himself, and the strong possibility that this woman ended up pregnant, she finally woke up and realized it was a seriously losing proposition. His conversations with people in person can’t be too much different from the made-up facts only he is privy to. It is likely she broke it off, had the little thing cleansed from her body.

    This would, of course, break his heart and turn it into a stone cold lump in his chest. But, it could have been a stone cold lump to begin with. She can’t be all bad.

    He writes as if he thinks it will result in him becoming one of the uber-wealthy. I don’t think the uber-wealthy will ever welcome him into their fold.

    All of this makes him a shallow, bitter, spouter of self-made-up-facts and his calling anyone that disgrees with him a girly man, feminized-male and a host of other derogatory names.

    I feel very sorry for this one. I think he deserves his bitter little world now. We will not be able to re-educate this one. He has doomed himself forever.

    Tap “Ignore Button” again.

    I’m sure if he receives no additional attention he will eventually become frustrated and leave.

  24. bradwilliams

    bradwilliamsGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    How do you push the Ignore button? Is this a real thing or notional?

  25. jmworacle

    jmworacle said, about 1 month ago

    There are two sets of standards, liberals are able to do anything and it is “oh, well” but you do not have to have evidence to comdem a conservative for wrong doing.

  26. cjr53

    cjr53 said, about 1 month ago

    Anyone that has been around enough to know AOL, knows about the “Ignore Button.” It is now just figurative. We can as a group ignore him/her/it.

    Let’s just ignore Scottsie and maybe he’ll pipe down and go away. He has stated way too many “facts” that he made up. Lacks credibility and gives “right-wingers” a bad name.

    Scottsie makes many personal attacks which are not necessary. And is very similar to a broken record. Genuine debate is good. That isn’t what Scottsie is doing.

    I believe this whole board will be better off without that sort of ilk. It would also be wonderful if the party of “No” would take that stance also on a national and local level.

    Republicans for many weeks have spouted things like “Death Panels” and no one bats an eye. When a Democrat states his belief of the Republicans plan is:

    Don’t get sick.
    If you do get sick, die quickly.

    This one presentation resulted in a flood of demands for an apology. I don’t think an apology is warranted, at least until apologies for the numerous “death panel” type comments made by Republicans all over the US result in apologies. And, Republicans come up with a viable alternative for those without health insurance.

    I know how much it costs for medical care. Without my insurance partially paid for by my employer, I’d have to sell my home and go live on the streets to pay for it all. There are millions of Americans without that benefit, yet we spend billions in Afghanistan and Iraq and are not one bit closer to catching Osama Bin Laden. Don’t forget, W & Crew started the wars and Barrack Obama inherited them.

    That money could have been spent fixing bridges, roads and other American infrastructure. But, no, it is wasted fighting wars if far off lands with Americans dying. What a sad commentary on the USA.

  27. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, about 1 month ago

    HOWGOZIT, you should know by now I don’t make things up, unlike Rush. He was caught exiting the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra without his name on it; he later referred to it as a “great weekend,” and it happens to be one of the #1 sex tourism spots. Look it up.

  28. ahab

    ahabGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    Zing!

  29. cdward

    cdward said, about 1 month ago

    charlie, if all you’re looking for is bold and italics, that’s simple.

    Two asterisks before a word or phrase coupled with two after it will give you bold.

    One before and after a word or phrase will give you italics.

    If that’s what you wanted, hope this helps.

  30. 4uk4ata

    4uk4ata said, about 1 month ago

    “There are two sets of standards, liberals are able to do anything and it is “oh, well” but you do not have to have evidence to comdem a conservative for wrong doing.”

    jmworacle - I think it may go the opposite way, actually. Remember the fuss about Clinton getting a BJ? I guess you do. Quick question - how many of his public denouncers at the time were proven to have been adulterers? And how deep do you have to dig to find that out? Or about the fact that Al Gore has NOT claimed he invented the internet, despite being ridiculed for having said that time and again during his election campaign?

    The bottom line is, it usually depends on the media you are following. But if you think Conservatives got it so hard and Liberals were let off the hook you haven’t paid much attention to the media in the last… 20+ years.

  31. petergrt

    petergrt said, about 1 month ago

    ” … Clinton getting a BJ? …. how many of his public denouncers at the time were proven to have been adulterers?”

    You have just proven jmworacle’s point.

    While Clinton has been impeached for perjury, under oath, a felony, he survived, whereas a number of Republicans who were found out to have extramarital relations - not a criminal offense, were forced to resign - by its peers, out of the principle.

    Some examples: Gingrich, Packwood and etc.

    Whereas on the Democratic side of the isle - there are criminals serving in the house and the White House …

  32. vhammon

    vhammonGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    cdward - thanks for the info !

  33. parkersinthehouse

    parkersinthehouse said, about 1 month ago

    wow it doesn’t work

    yes it does work

  34. comYics

    comYics said, about 1 month ago

    ahh hhahhahahahaa

    yeah tks cd

  35. oldlegodad

    oldlegodadGenius_badge said, about 1 month ago

    All

    of

    codes

    are at Omar’s

    link

  36. ReasonsVentriloquist

    ReasonsVentriloquist said, about 1 month ago

    DSPED is right!

  37. parkersinthehouse

    parkersinthehouse said, about 1 month ago

    tks dad