Peanuts by Charles Schulz for October 04, 2012

  1. Snoopy rides again
    The#1BoiseStateFan  over 11 years ago

    No wonder she’ll fail.

     •  Reply
  2. Stewiebrian
    pouncingtiger  over 11 years ago

    Sally is blond after all.

     •  Reply
  3. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  over 11 years ago

    Relabelling something doesn’t help you understand it, it just confuses things.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Dean8  over 11 years ago

    They must be in the central time zone

     •  Reply
  5. Yosemity sam
    William Reynolds  over 11 years ago

    Linus’s explanation is perfectly clear to a mathematical thinker. The problem is, most people are mathematally illerate, I.e. those who play the lottery expecting to win.

     •  Reply
  6. Grog poop
    GROG Premium Member over 11 years ago

    I shudder when I hear that some people’s majors were in math & statistics. I worked with a guy who actually liked doing calculus problems.

     •  Reply
  7. Airbrush 20240305192116
    Number Three  over 11 years ago

    That distraction was perfect timing, Sally!

    xxx

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    bwalk7217 Premium Member over 11 years ago

    If you want to be expressive use New Math, if you want your answers to be correct, and, most importantly, understood, use old math.

     •  Reply
  9. Banditart
    mike_slmi  over 11 years ago

    She makes a good point. His instructions are a bit long.

     •  Reply
  10. G0440857
    Rise22  over 11 years ago

    Math is static – to try and make it “new” only makes it more difficult to learn…

     •  Reply
  11. Scowling mark
    ComicRelief  over 11 years ago

    Linus is explaining it well. New math was indeed set theory. And it was a disaster; horrible idea for elementary education.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    WaitingMan  over 11 years ago

    A story from college. Day one of Calculus II. The professor walks into the class and first thing, draws a large 3 on the blackboard. Asks the class, “Can anyone tell me what this is?” Many people shout out “3”. I’m thinking, “Too obvious.” The professor says, “No, it’s a chalk scribble that is a representation of the concept of 3.” Very cool start to what was an excellent class.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    angusdad  over 11 years ago

    The strip today brought back all those old anxieties of new math..

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    starbase502  over 11 years ago

    Charles Schulz, the prophet.

     •  Reply
  15. Screenshot 2013 08 01 06 13 37
    bgby4884  over 11 years ago

    The answer is red.

     •  Reply
  16. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  over 11 years ago

    Yup! My thing is languages, literature, poetry and like that. School was a nightmare. They could explain and show and show and explain, and I might understand it for a few minutes but the next day it was gone. The one day I “got” a lesson and finished the worksheet first (in 8th grade) the teacher accused me of cheating. How I could “cheat” and yet be the first to finish, she never explained. How can you “copy” or “cheat” when no one else has got it done?

     •  Reply
  17. Xfiles 031
    Squirrelchaser  over 11 years ago

    I went to elementary school in the early 70s, never encountered ‘new math.’ Perhaps my district choose not to implement it. Until this story arc, I actually did not think there was really a ‘new math’, that it was just shomething made up on sit-coms for humor. I’ve always liked math, took every course I could in HS, perhaps I’ll check it out, sounds interesting.

     •  Reply
  18. Pogo
    Buggerlugs  over 11 years ago

    How much is 2+2 in new math?

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    iced tea  over 11 years ago

    This was how it was helping my older son with his homework. He had A.D.D.

     •  Reply
  20. Cimg1807
    cookies333  over 11 years ago

    Math isn’t my thing either. : )

     •  Reply
  21. Jp steve x
    JP Steve Premium Member over 11 years ago

    New Math

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Peanuts