Tom Toles for April 17, 2012

  1. Klinger1
    walruscarver2000  about 12 years ago

    Take a look at their record of presidential protection…not too impressive.

     •  Reply
  2. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  about 12 years ago

    hokey-pokey / hanky-panky… po-tay-to / po-tah-to.

     •  Reply
  3. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member about 12 years ago

    “Like anyone would threaten Obama?”

    Well let’s see, there’s a small but outspoken faction whoA) openly (and not-so-openly) carry guns in public; B) believe the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to protect them from their own government; andC) believe Obama is a foreign agent secretly (and explicitly) committed to the overthrow of this country.

    You’re right; what possible reason could Obama have for wanting protection?

     •  Reply
  4. Cheryl 149 3
    Justice22  about 12 years ago

    The news reported this involved the military too and it was not a “secure” area.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    ARodney  about 12 years ago

    Ima, you are sick. The number of threats against Obama has gone up four times from the number against GW Bush. America, especially the far right, has a serious race problem and a serious gun problem. Political assassinations and terrorist attacks on doctors in this country happen overwhelmingly from one side. Get a clue.

     •  Reply
  6. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  about 12 years ago

    I wonder if any papers censored this one, because what they seem to be doing isn’t likely to lead to any children……..

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    womzilla  about 12 years ago

    Shouldn’t that be US Secret “Service”?

     •  Reply
  8. Liberty
    lontooni  about 12 years ago

    tell us what the “big picture” is we really do need know

     •  Reply
  9. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member about 12 years ago

    Well, that’s your prerogative, but by including the text of my comment in yours it seems counterproductive, unless you also want to go flag yourself.

    I’m was only speculating that it’s her in all three ‘toons. Like I said, we haven’t seen her face. But on 4/15 we saw triangular blonde hair and red shoes. On 4/16, we saw triangular blonde hair, but couldn’t see the shoes. Today we see the red shoes, but we don’t see the hair. Of course, even if it’s the same woman in all three, there’s no guarantee that it’s Ann Romney. Mitt may have been sitting on the sofa with some other blonde yesterday.

     •  Reply
  10. Cheryl 149 3
    Justice22  about 12 years ago

    I bet those were “working girls”.

     •  Reply
  11. Darwin fish
    DenverMosaic  about 12 years ago

    “Like anyone would threaten Obama?”

    Your kind would.

     •  Reply
  12. Cheryl 149 3
    Justice22  about 12 years ago

    Gee, No one picked up on the “working girl” comment. Which work is hardest? , That or a stay-at home housewife? Is there any difference?

     •  Reply
  13. Me on trikke 2007    05
    pam Miner  about 12 years ago

    I saw it. didn’t know what to say. Maybe that if you’re poor enough you will work t doing things you wouldn’t do otherwise? Rich men, men in power attract women that don’t know any better..

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Tom Toles